The result of the discussion was relisted here. ~ Rob Talk 00:48, 10 April 2016 (UTC)
Propose merging
Template:Delete page with
Template:La.
For background, see
WP:HD#Templated links with specified deletion rationale. Basically, I asked if there were a way to have {{
la}} supply a deletion rationale, e.g. by adding a parameter that would be automatically filled into the rationale box when you clicked the "delete" link. As it's not possible,
Edgars2007 created this new template, explained how to use it, and concluded with But it may be better to include in the main {{
la}} template, an opinion with which I agree. I'm just seeking further opinions as to whether this would be a good idea, as well as technical assistance in carrying that out.
Nyttend (
talk)
14:30, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
|rationale=
parameter to {{
la}} and all related templates? That's all I'm attempting to request in this merger nomination.
Nyttend (
talk)
05:27, 10 February 2016 (UTC)The result of the discussion was relisted here. ~ Rob Talk 00:48, 10 April 2016 (UTC)
Propose merging
Template:Honda international timeline with
Template:Modern Honda vehicles.
Redundant template, the latter has covered more models.
John123521 (
Talk-
Contib.)
RA
13:31, 25 February 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was relisted here. ~ Rob Talk 00:48, 10 April 2016 (UTC)
Like Portal:Current events/Calendar box (which is currently at MfD), this template is also unused. GeoffreyT2000 ( talk) 15:48, 20 March 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. There haven't been any strong policy-based arguments advanced here to support or oppose this fork, but there is a strong numerical consensus against the fork. Out of the rationales for keeping/deleting, I found Izno's comment about the lack of a main article most convincing, especially with no rebuttal offered. ~ Rob Talk 00:51, 10 April 2016 (UTC)
Not needed and there is not even an article for this. No template exists for previous seasons. Qed237 (talk) 16:53, 13 March 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete as unopposed. WP:REFUND applies. ~ Rob Talk 01:05, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
3 links and a redirect does not a navbox make, per WP:NENAN. Izno ( talk) 13:45, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete as unopposed. WP:REFUND applies. ~ Rob Talk 01:03, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
3 links does not a navbox make per WP:NENAN. Izno ( talk) 13:44, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was userfy. Multiple expressed a "delete until articles are made" opinion. As the creator has expressed a desire to userfy it, it seems appropriate to move this to the userspace with a strong caution to NorwayHS4 not to bring this back to the Template space until several more articles are made. If this were moved to the Template space with less than 6-7 links, it would be appropriate to delete it based on consensus that this needs more links to be useful. ~ Rob Talk 14:09, 9 April 2016 (UTC)
WP:TOOSOON, only two blue links, one of which is only tangentially related to the subject. Delete until the corresponding articles are made. Ten Pound Hammer • ( What did I screw up now?) 03:22, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete as unopposed. WP:REFUND applies. ~ Rob Talk 01:01, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
Only two live wiklinks. Not enough for navigation. MrLinkinPark333 ( talk) 01:41, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was relisted here. ~ Rob Talk 00:48, 10 April 2016 (UTC)
Propose merging
Template:Delete page with
Template:La.
For background, see
WP:HD#Templated links with specified deletion rationale. Basically, I asked if there were a way to have {{
la}} supply a deletion rationale, e.g. by adding a parameter that would be automatically filled into the rationale box when you clicked the "delete" link. As it's not possible,
Edgars2007 created this new template, explained how to use it, and concluded with But it may be better to include in the main {{
la}} template, an opinion with which I agree. I'm just seeking further opinions as to whether this would be a good idea, as well as technical assistance in carrying that out.
Nyttend (
talk)
14:30, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
|rationale=
parameter to {{
la}} and all related templates? That's all I'm attempting to request in this merger nomination.
Nyttend (
talk)
05:27, 10 February 2016 (UTC)The result of the discussion was relisted here. ~ Rob Talk 00:48, 10 April 2016 (UTC)
Propose merging
Template:Honda international timeline with
Template:Modern Honda vehicles.
Redundant template, the latter has covered more models.
John123521 (
Talk-
Contib.)
RA
13:31, 25 February 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was relisted here. ~ Rob Talk 00:48, 10 April 2016 (UTC)
Like Portal:Current events/Calendar box (which is currently at MfD), this template is also unused. GeoffreyT2000 ( talk) 15:48, 20 March 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. There haven't been any strong policy-based arguments advanced here to support or oppose this fork, but there is a strong numerical consensus against the fork. Out of the rationales for keeping/deleting, I found Izno's comment about the lack of a main article most convincing, especially with no rebuttal offered. ~ Rob Talk 00:51, 10 April 2016 (UTC)
Not needed and there is not even an article for this. No template exists for previous seasons. Qed237 (talk) 16:53, 13 March 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete as unopposed. WP:REFUND applies. ~ Rob Talk 01:05, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
3 links and a redirect does not a navbox make, per WP:NENAN. Izno ( talk) 13:45, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete as unopposed. WP:REFUND applies. ~ Rob Talk 01:03, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
3 links does not a navbox make per WP:NENAN. Izno ( talk) 13:44, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was userfy. Multiple expressed a "delete until articles are made" opinion. As the creator has expressed a desire to userfy it, it seems appropriate to move this to the userspace with a strong caution to NorwayHS4 not to bring this back to the Template space until several more articles are made. If this were moved to the Template space with less than 6-7 links, it would be appropriate to delete it based on consensus that this needs more links to be useful. ~ Rob Talk 14:09, 9 April 2016 (UTC)
WP:TOOSOON, only two blue links, one of which is only tangentially related to the subject. Delete until the corresponding articles are made. Ten Pound Hammer • ( What did I screw up now?) 03:22, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete as unopposed. WP:REFUND applies. ~ Rob Talk 01:01, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
Only two live wiklinks. Not enough for navigation. MrLinkinPark333 ( talk) 01:41, 29 March 2016 (UTC)