From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

June 13

Template:PD-banknote

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was deletePlastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:48, 20 June 2016 (UTC) reply

Unused/no transclusions, redundant to {{ PD currency}} FASTILY 10:08, 13 June 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Roman/2

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was deletePlastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:48, 20 June 2016 (UTC) reply

0 transclusions. Functionality has been completely superceded by Template:Roman. —  Andy W. ( talk ·ctb) 06:38, 13 June 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Motorola microcontrollers

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was merge, why not? If there is a problem feel free to let me know and I can reopen this discussion.  Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:49, 20 June 2016 (UTC) reply

Propose merging Template:Motorola microcontrollers with Template:Motorola processors.
One template can handle all the stuff currently divided between the two templates; and there already seems to be some overlap. Template talk:Motorola microcontrollers also suggest merging. DavidCary ( talk) 02:24, 5 June 2016 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ~ Rob Talk 02:21, 13 June 2016 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:CC-by-3.0-Works

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was deletePlastikspork ―Œ(talk) 02:50, 20 June 2016 (UTC) reply

Unused, no transclusions, redundant to {{ Cc-by-3.0}} FASTILY 00:45, 13 June 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Publication officielle

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was deletePlastikspork ―Œ(talk) 02:50, 20 June 2016 (UTC) reply

Unused file license template, and likely based on an incorrect interpretation of copyright. See also: c:Commons:Deletion requests/Template:Publication officielle FASTILY 00:11, 13 June 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:PD-status

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was deletePlastikspork ―Œ(talk) 02:50, 20 June 2016 (UTC) reply

Unused/no transclusions, redundant to {{ Non-free fair use}}, and overly complicated/difficult to use FASTILY 00:06, 13 June 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:PD-script

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was deletePlastikspork ―Œ(talk) 02:50, 20 June 2016 (UTC) reply

Unused/no transclusions, redundant to {{ PD-simple}} FASTILY 00:01, 13 June 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

June 13

Template:PD-banknote

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was deletePlastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:48, 20 June 2016 (UTC) reply

Unused/no transclusions, redundant to {{ PD currency}} FASTILY 10:08, 13 June 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Roman/2

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was deletePlastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:48, 20 June 2016 (UTC) reply

0 transclusions. Functionality has been completely superceded by Template:Roman. —  Andy W. ( talk ·ctb) 06:38, 13 June 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Motorola microcontrollers

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was merge, why not? If there is a problem feel free to let me know and I can reopen this discussion.  Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:49, 20 June 2016 (UTC) reply

Propose merging Template:Motorola microcontrollers with Template:Motorola processors.
One template can handle all the stuff currently divided between the two templates; and there already seems to be some overlap. Template talk:Motorola microcontrollers also suggest merging. DavidCary ( talk) 02:24, 5 June 2016 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ~ Rob Talk 02:21, 13 June 2016 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:CC-by-3.0-Works

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was deletePlastikspork ―Œ(talk) 02:50, 20 June 2016 (UTC) reply

Unused, no transclusions, redundant to {{ Cc-by-3.0}} FASTILY 00:45, 13 June 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Publication officielle

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was deletePlastikspork ―Œ(talk) 02:50, 20 June 2016 (UTC) reply

Unused file license template, and likely based on an incorrect interpretation of copyright. See also: c:Commons:Deletion requests/Template:Publication officielle FASTILY 00:11, 13 June 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:PD-status

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was deletePlastikspork ―Œ(talk) 02:50, 20 June 2016 (UTC) reply

Unused/no transclusions, redundant to {{ Non-free fair use}}, and overly complicated/difficult to use FASTILY 00:06, 13 June 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:PD-script

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was deletePlastikspork ―Œ(talk) 02:50, 20 June 2016 (UTC) reply

Unused/no transclusions, redundant to {{ PD-simple}} FASTILY 00:01, 13 June 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook