The result of the discussion was redirect to {{ File source}}. This is a soft action due to lack of participation, and any editor may undo it. ~ Rob13 Talk 22:04, 15 December 2016 (UTC)
This template is currently the close duplicate of template:file source. It should be deleted and then re-created as redirect to that template. George Ho ( talk) 20:42, 7 December 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Relisted on 2016 December 15 ~ Rob13 Talk 22:06, 15 December 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was keep. Content decisions about removing redlinks can be made on the template's talk page. ~ Rob13 Talk 22:06, 15 December 2016 (UTC)
Delete. Of the 82 quarterbacks listed in this navbox, just under half (40 of 82) are redlinks. If you think about it, this makes sense, since no college program in its history is going to have all (or even a majority) of its quarterbacks be notable enough to meet WP:NCOLLATH. Per WP:NAV, unlinked entries should be avoided in navboxes; a proliferation of redlinks is also discouraged. I think this is a perfect example of where a list would be much more appropriate than a navbox. In a list article there is no issue with having redlinked and unlinked names. In fact, we already have Category:Lists of college football quarterbacks which has far fewer articles than we have navboxes in Category:American college football quarterback navigational boxes. Note that List of Alabama Crimson Tide starting quarterbacks already exists. – Grondemar 15:14, 7 December 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Relisted on 2016 December 15 ~ Rob13 Talk 22:06, 15 December 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Relisted on 2016 December 15 ~ Rob13 Talk 22:06, 15 December 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Relisted on 2016 December 15 ~ Rob13 Talk 22:06, 15 December 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was no consensus ~ Rob13 Talk 06:56, 15 December 2016 (UTC)
Propose merging
Template:Heads of the Ministries of the Government of India with
Template:Union ministries of India.
I propose to merge both the templates to create one template since both are about same topics. -- Pankaj Jain
Capankajsmilyo (
talk ·
contribs ·
count)
20:14, 9 November 2016 (UTC)
Oppose Both templates are not about the same topics. One is about ministries, the other lists of ministers.— indopug ( talk) 08:56, 25 November 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was redirect to {{ File source}}. This is a soft action due to lack of participation, and any editor may undo it. ~ Rob13 Talk 22:04, 15 December 2016 (UTC)
This template is currently the close duplicate of template:file source. It should be deleted and then re-created as redirect to that template. George Ho ( talk) 20:42, 7 December 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Relisted on 2016 December 15 ~ Rob13 Talk 22:06, 15 December 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was keep. Content decisions about removing redlinks can be made on the template's talk page. ~ Rob13 Talk 22:06, 15 December 2016 (UTC)
Delete. Of the 82 quarterbacks listed in this navbox, just under half (40 of 82) are redlinks. If you think about it, this makes sense, since no college program in its history is going to have all (or even a majority) of its quarterbacks be notable enough to meet WP:NCOLLATH. Per WP:NAV, unlinked entries should be avoided in navboxes; a proliferation of redlinks is also discouraged. I think this is a perfect example of where a list would be much more appropriate than a navbox. In a list article there is no issue with having redlinked and unlinked names. In fact, we already have Category:Lists of college football quarterbacks which has far fewer articles than we have navboxes in Category:American college football quarterback navigational boxes. Note that List of Alabama Crimson Tide starting quarterbacks already exists. – Grondemar 15:14, 7 December 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Relisted on 2016 December 15 ~ Rob13 Talk 22:06, 15 December 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Relisted on 2016 December 15 ~ Rob13 Talk 22:06, 15 December 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Relisted on 2016 December 15 ~ Rob13 Talk 22:06, 15 December 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was no consensus ~ Rob13 Talk 06:56, 15 December 2016 (UTC)
Propose merging
Template:Heads of the Ministries of the Government of India with
Template:Union ministries of India.
I propose to merge both the templates to create one template since both are about same topics. -- Pankaj Jain
Capankajsmilyo (
talk ·
contribs ·
count)
20:14, 9 November 2016 (UTC)
Oppose Both templates are not about the same topics. One is about ministries, the other lists of ministers.— indopug ( talk) 08:56, 25 November 2016 (UTC)