- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was keep with no prejudice against moving to another title ( non-admin closure). ~ Rob Talk 13:46, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
- Template:Miss Philippines winners in the Grand Slam pageants ( talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
There are no "Grand Slam pageants" as the title claims. Fancruft The Banner talk 18:25, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
- Keep @
The Banner: Then why not nominate for the deletion the twenty other templates at the same also. Also you say there is no 'Grand slam pageants' but the title of the template links to
Big Four international beauty pageants. Therefore there is an article and the rationale for delete isn't true.
...William, is the complaint department really on
the roof?
21:58, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
- Mr. Appleshuffle and some other suspected sockpuppets do their utmost best to promote Miss Supranational (deleted 5 times) and Miss Grand International as Very Important Pageants. And they take it far and wide. The "Big Four Pageants" is an existing entity and term with a lot of coverage while the Grand Slam Pageants as an entity and term has hardly any coverage.
- Found the category you mentioned. What a nightmare. The Banner talk 22:49, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
- Keep Unless all templates in
Category:Big Four pageant winners by country templates are suppose to be deleted, this one should not be singled out. It is as useful as the others.--
TonyTheTiger (
T /
C /
WP:FOUR /
WP:CHICAGO /
WP:WAWARD)
04:46, 21 April 2016 (UTC)
- I did not know that there were more when I nominated. Over the next few days I will start de-spamming those templates but the works also depends on Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Colombiabeauty. The Banner talk 09:27, 21 April 2016 (UTC) And no, TonyTheTiger, I do not regard you as part of the sockpuppet-problem on pageants.
- Comment. @
The Banner: Can you explain to me why you want this deleted if the Big Four Pageants it navigates between are notable? Is it literally just the name of the template? Would you object to the template if it were named
Template:Miss Philippines winners in the Big Four international pageants? ~
Rob
Talk
01:27, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
- I will still regard it as fancruft but at least it will give a proper tool to throw al pageants out that are not part of the Big Four. The point was that it originally was misused to promote non-notable pageants to a more important status under the made-up name Grand Slam. The Banner talk 13:26, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
- Comment I just restored the TfD-template. The Banner talk 13:33, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete ( non-admin closure). ~ Rob Talk 01:28, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
Per WP:NENAN at less than 5 articles; articles in template are well-linked between each other; unlikely to expand given Legends; and video games linked using another template. Izno ( talk) 12:57, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
- Delete redundant with {{ Star Wars games}} -- 70.51.45.100 ( talk) 06:06, 21 April 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. ( non-admin closure) ~ Rob Talk 01:28, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
- Template:Star Wars Galaxies ( talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Per WP:NENAN in that this navbox links fewer than 5 articles. Navigation is also better served by a couple of other templates in existence linking Star Wars video games and Star Wars books. Izno ( talk) 12:39, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
- Delete redundant with {{ Star Wars games}} -- 70.51.45.100 ( talk) 06:06, 21 April 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was keep with no prejudice against moving to another title ( non-admin closure). ~ Rob Talk 13:46, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
- Template:Miss Philippines winners in the Grand Slam pageants ( talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
There are no "Grand Slam pageants" as the title claims. Fancruft The Banner talk 18:25, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
- Keep @
The Banner: Then why not nominate for the deletion the twenty other templates at the same also. Also you say there is no 'Grand slam pageants' but the title of the template links to
Big Four international beauty pageants. Therefore there is an article and the rationale for delete isn't true.
...William, is the complaint department really on
the roof?
21:58, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
- Mr. Appleshuffle and some other suspected sockpuppets do their utmost best to promote Miss Supranational (deleted 5 times) and Miss Grand International as Very Important Pageants. And they take it far and wide. The "Big Four Pageants" is an existing entity and term with a lot of coverage while the Grand Slam Pageants as an entity and term has hardly any coverage.
- Found the category you mentioned. What a nightmare. The Banner talk 22:49, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
- Keep Unless all templates in
Category:Big Four pageant winners by country templates are suppose to be deleted, this one should not be singled out. It is as useful as the others.--
TonyTheTiger (
T /
C /
WP:FOUR /
WP:CHICAGO /
WP:WAWARD)
04:46, 21 April 2016 (UTC)
- I did not know that there were more when I nominated. Over the next few days I will start de-spamming those templates but the works also depends on Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Colombiabeauty. The Banner talk 09:27, 21 April 2016 (UTC) And no, TonyTheTiger, I do not regard you as part of the sockpuppet-problem on pageants.
- Comment. @
The Banner: Can you explain to me why you want this deleted if the Big Four Pageants it navigates between are notable? Is it literally just the name of the template? Would you object to the template if it were named
Template:Miss Philippines winners in the Big Four international pageants? ~
Rob
Talk
01:27, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
- I will still regard it as fancruft but at least it will give a proper tool to throw al pageants out that are not part of the Big Four. The point was that it originally was misused to promote non-notable pageants to a more important status under the made-up name Grand Slam. The Banner talk 13:26, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
- Comment I just restored the TfD-template. The Banner talk 13:33, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete ( non-admin closure). ~ Rob Talk 01:28, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
Per WP:NENAN at less than 5 articles; articles in template are well-linked between each other; unlikely to expand given Legends; and video games linked using another template. Izno ( talk) 12:57, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
- Delete redundant with {{ Star Wars games}} -- 70.51.45.100 ( talk) 06:06, 21 April 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. ( non-admin closure) ~ Rob Talk 01:28, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
- Template:Star Wars Galaxies ( talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Per WP:NENAN in that this navbox links fewer than 5 articles. Navigation is also better served by a couple of other templates in existence linking Star Wars video games and Star Wars books. Izno ( talk) 12:39, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
- Delete redundant with {{ Star Wars games}} -- 70.51.45.100 ( talk) 06:06, 21 April 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).