The result of the discussion was merge/delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:36, 14 July 2015 (UTC)
This template is used (transcluded) in only one article. By definition, templates should be used when there is a need to transclude the same content in several articles. I propose to WP:substitute this template in the Serbia article and than do delete it. This is similar to the Template:WW2InfoBox which was used only in the World War II article, and was deleted so. Vanjagenije (talk) 22:21, 28 June 2015 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:33, 14 July 2015 (UTC)
The topic of this template is the video game engine Gamebryo, listing the video games that use it. That's already mentioned here and has its own category.
Now, WP:NAVBOX says: "The articles should refer to each other, to a reasonable extent" and WP:NAV says: "The goal is not to cram as many related articles as possible into one space. Ask yourself, does this help the reader in reading up on related topics?"
Gamebryo is used in very different games, from strategy games to action-adventure games, from role-playing games tower defense games. They were developed by several studios. Besides having the same engine, they do not have anything in common. And because it's already listed in the main article and has its own category, it seems unnecessary to have this navbox around. Soetermans. T / C 10:15, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. Seems to be very rarely used, and not used anytime recently (as far as I can tell). Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:42, 14 July 2015 (UTC)
Article notices should be used for serious issues that actually require effort to remedy. Alakzi ( talk) 17:10, 20 June 2015 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was no consensus to merge. Opabinia regalis ( talk) 06:55, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
Propose merging
Template:Scite with
Template:Ussc.
The functions of {{
Scite}} are served by {{
Ussc}}, which is a more detailed template. There is a discussion at "
Template talk:Scite" stating that {{Scite}} differs from {{Ussc}} as the former does not create an external link. If this is a desired feature, an appropriate parameter can be added to {{Ussc}}. —
SMUconlaw (
talk)
20:21, 28 June 2015 (UTC)
{{
scite}}
is primarily intended to be used in the lead sentence and contains no external links. {{
ussc}}
is primarily intended to be used in external links and references sections and contains external links. --
MZMcBride (
talk)
02:41, 29 June 2015 (UTC){{
scite}}
templates that were put in place a long time ago. Even if a consensus were to be reached here for the template merge, I'm still worried that other editors (not involved in this discussion here, and becoming aware of the merge only after the fact) may object to the resulting chaos caused by the wholesale — even if intended to be temporary — violation of WP:EL in countless articles on US legal topics. —
Rich
wales (no relation to Jimbo)
18:30, 30 June 2015 (UTC)The result of the discussion was Delete Nabla ( talk) 01:15, 13 July 2015 (UTC)
Template that was only ever used in one article, which it has now been removed from. It is extremely ugly, and is an inferior way of representing data that is already displayed in table form within the article. Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 15:04, 28 June 2015 (UTC) It wasn't extremely ugly it was very useful and I put alot of work to it
You're ugly, if you can make better then do it smartass
The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:32, 14 July 2015 (UTC)
The Cardinals did not win the World Series in 1996 so this template, which portends to represent the 1996 champions is simply wrong and unnceccesary Spanneraol ( talk) 13:15, 28 June 2015 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:25, 14 July 2015 (UTC)
Now basically a complicated wrapper for 22 other colour succession templates (per system rather than for an entire country's systems). Most transclusions (originally more than 1,600) have already been replaced directly with these other templates due to the merger of {{ China line}} with {{ Rail-interchange}} and {{ Rail color box}}.
Should be histmerged with {{ BJS color}}, {{ CCRT color}}, {{ CDM color}}, {{ CSM color}}, {{ DLM color}}, {{ HBM color}}, {{ HZM color}}, {{ KunmingRT color}}, {{ NJM color}}, {{ SHM color}}, {{ SYM color}}, {{ SZM color}}, {{ SZRT color}}, {{ TJM color}}, {{ WHM color}}, possibly {{ XA color}}, [Note 1] and {{ ZZM color}}; and then substituted and deleted. Jc86035 ( talk • contribs) Use {{ re|Jc86035}} to reply to me 13:31, 28 June 2015 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Delete Nabla ( talk) 01:07, 13 July 2015 (UTC)
WP:NENAN/ WP:TOOSOON. Only two singles and an album so far. Ten Pound Hammer • ( What did I screw up now?) 01:48, 28 June 2015 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was merge/delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:36, 14 July 2015 (UTC)
This template is used (transcluded) in only one article. By definition, templates should be used when there is a need to transclude the same content in several articles. I propose to WP:substitute this template in the Serbia article and than do delete it. This is similar to the Template:WW2InfoBox which was used only in the World War II article, and was deleted so. Vanjagenije (talk) 22:21, 28 June 2015 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:33, 14 July 2015 (UTC)
The topic of this template is the video game engine Gamebryo, listing the video games that use it. That's already mentioned here and has its own category.
Now, WP:NAVBOX says: "The articles should refer to each other, to a reasonable extent" and WP:NAV says: "The goal is not to cram as many related articles as possible into one space. Ask yourself, does this help the reader in reading up on related topics?"
Gamebryo is used in very different games, from strategy games to action-adventure games, from role-playing games tower defense games. They were developed by several studios. Besides having the same engine, they do not have anything in common. And because it's already listed in the main article and has its own category, it seems unnecessary to have this navbox around. Soetermans. T / C 10:15, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. Seems to be very rarely used, and not used anytime recently (as far as I can tell). Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:42, 14 July 2015 (UTC)
Article notices should be used for serious issues that actually require effort to remedy. Alakzi ( talk) 17:10, 20 June 2015 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was no consensus to merge. Opabinia regalis ( talk) 06:55, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
Propose merging
Template:Scite with
Template:Ussc.
The functions of {{
Scite}} are served by {{
Ussc}}, which is a more detailed template. There is a discussion at "
Template talk:Scite" stating that {{Scite}} differs from {{Ussc}} as the former does not create an external link. If this is a desired feature, an appropriate parameter can be added to {{Ussc}}. —
SMUconlaw (
talk)
20:21, 28 June 2015 (UTC)
{{
scite}}
is primarily intended to be used in the lead sentence and contains no external links. {{
ussc}}
is primarily intended to be used in external links and references sections and contains external links. --
MZMcBride (
talk)
02:41, 29 June 2015 (UTC){{
scite}}
templates that were put in place a long time ago. Even if a consensus were to be reached here for the template merge, I'm still worried that other editors (not involved in this discussion here, and becoming aware of the merge only after the fact) may object to the resulting chaos caused by the wholesale — even if intended to be temporary — violation of WP:EL in countless articles on US legal topics. —
Rich
wales (no relation to Jimbo)
18:30, 30 June 2015 (UTC)The result of the discussion was Delete Nabla ( talk) 01:15, 13 July 2015 (UTC)
Template that was only ever used in one article, which it has now been removed from. It is extremely ugly, and is an inferior way of representing data that is already displayed in table form within the article. Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 15:04, 28 June 2015 (UTC) It wasn't extremely ugly it was very useful and I put alot of work to it
You're ugly, if you can make better then do it smartass
The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:32, 14 July 2015 (UTC)
The Cardinals did not win the World Series in 1996 so this template, which portends to represent the 1996 champions is simply wrong and unnceccesary Spanneraol ( talk) 13:15, 28 June 2015 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:25, 14 July 2015 (UTC)
Now basically a complicated wrapper for 22 other colour succession templates (per system rather than for an entire country's systems). Most transclusions (originally more than 1,600) have already been replaced directly with these other templates due to the merger of {{ China line}} with {{ Rail-interchange}} and {{ Rail color box}}.
Should be histmerged with {{ BJS color}}, {{ CCRT color}}, {{ CDM color}}, {{ CSM color}}, {{ DLM color}}, {{ HBM color}}, {{ HZM color}}, {{ KunmingRT color}}, {{ NJM color}}, {{ SHM color}}, {{ SYM color}}, {{ SZM color}}, {{ SZRT color}}, {{ TJM color}}, {{ WHM color}}, possibly {{ XA color}}, [Note 1] and {{ ZZM color}}; and then substituted and deleted. Jc86035 ( talk • contribs) Use {{ re|Jc86035}} to reply to me 13:31, 28 June 2015 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Delete Nabla ( talk) 01:07, 13 July 2015 (UTC)
WP:NENAN/ WP:TOOSOON. Only two singles and an album so far. Ten Pound Hammer • ( What did I screw up now?) 01:48, 28 June 2015 (UTC)