- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. — Earwig talk 02:54, 12 August 2015 (UTC)
- Template:Andrew Kooman ( talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Not enough links to provide useful navigation. Rob Sinden ( talk) 14:43, 20 July 2015 (UTC)
- Keep - I haven't ever heard of three links being insufficient for a navbox. Surely this navbox provides useful navigation between these three articles. Neelix ( talk) 14:51, 20 July 2015 (UTC)
- There's plenty of precedent, and even an essay, WP:NENAN. With just two works links, navbox is unnecessary. In this case, the author's article will refer to both the works articles, and each works article will refer to the author, so if the two works articles do not refer to one another, all that is needed is a link to each in the "See also" section. -- Rob Sinden ( talk) 15:14, 20 July 2015 (UTC)
- Delete WP:NENAN. Jackmcbarn ( talk) 16:35, 24 July 2015 (UTC)
- Delete. Unnecessary. -- torri2( talk/ contribs) 23:47, 27 July 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was relisted at Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2015 August 7#Template:Imre Kertész. Alakzi ( talk) 08:36, 7 August 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. — Earwig talk 02:54, 12 August 2015 (UTC)
- Template:Andrew Kooman ( talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Not enough links to provide useful navigation. Rob Sinden ( talk) 14:43, 20 July 2015 (UTC)
- Keep - I haven't ever heard of three links being insufficient for a navbox. Surely this navbox provides useful navigation between these three articles. Neelix ( talk) 14:51, 20 July 2015 (UTC)
- There's plenty of precedent, and even an essay, WP:NENAN. With just two works links, navbox is unnecessary. In this case, the author's article will refer to both the works articles, and each works article will refer to the author, so if the two works articles do not refer to one another, all that is needed is a link to each in the "See also" section. -- Rob Sinden ( talk) 15:14, 20 July 2015 (UTC)
- Delete WP:NENAN. Jackmcbarn ( talk) 16:35, 24 July 2015 (UTC)
- Delete. Unnecessary. -- torri2( talk/ contribs) 23:47, 27 July 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was relisted at Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2015 August 7#Template:Imre Kertész. Alakzi ( talk) 08:36, 7 August 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.