The result of the discussion was keep.. Overall consensus is for the template to be retained. Discussion about a conversion, which would require for the template to be retained in order to be performed, or a name change, can continue on the template's talk page. North America 1000 12:35, 20 July 2015 (UTC)
I don't personally see the need for this. We only have a few basic articles (as in, most of these simply link to sections within the same articles), and it's not general practise to have individual model timelines either. The existing company templates serve the purpose more than adequately, so this is a tad redundant. Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 17:48, 11 July 2015 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. Opabinia regalis ( talk) 01:40, 21 July 2015 (UTC)
This is a non-notable award given to apprentices (i.e. schoolboy youth players) in the 2nd-4th divisions of English football, and does not merit navboxes. Giant Snowman 15:43, 11 July 2015 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was keep.. Overall consensus is for the template to be retained. Discussion about a conversion, which would require for the template to be retained in order to be performed, or a name change, can continue on the template's talk page. North America 1000 12:35, 20 July 2015 (UTC)
I don't personally see the need for this. We only have a few basic articles (as in, most of these simply link to sections within the same articles), and it's not general practise to have individual model timelines either. The existing company templates serve the purpose more than adequately, so this is a tad redundant. Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 17:48, 11 July 2015 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. Opabinia regalis ( talk) 01:40, 21 July 2015 (UTC)
This is a non-notable award given to apprentices (i.e. schoolboy youth players) in the 2nd-4th divisions of English football, and does not merit navboxes. Giant Snowman 15:43, 11 July 2015 (UTC)