The result of the discussion was relisted on 2014 November 29. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:38, 29 November 2014 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 04:19, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
{{
100%}} outputs <span style="font-size:100%;>[...]</span>
, which is the equevilent of "do nothing with the font size". Therefor completely useless. Also, ambiguous, generic naming for all other templates. -- [[
User:Edokter]] {{
talk}}
09:55, 17 November 2014 (UTC)
-- [[
User:Edokter]] {{
talk}}
10:39, 17 November 2014 (UTC)
{{120%|Some text}}
does between code and page, after which subsequent encounters with {{[N]%|…}}
templates have a point of reference (even if curiosity and/or uncertainty hasn't already prompted an editor to visit the template page/s, encounter {{
resize}} and {{
Resize shortcuts}}, etc). Perhaps some more opinions are needed.
Sardanaphalus (
talk)
15:19, 17 November 2014 (UTC){{N%|…}}
with {{resize|N%|…}}
..?The result of the discussion was delete Martijn Hoekstra ( talk) 17:16, 23 November 2014 (UTC)
This is a newly created, yet unused, template to cross out words using <s>...</s>
. I see two problems with this. It is redundant to html tags s and del, and the documentation also mentions problems where <nowiki>...</nowiki>
tags are needed. I may have fixed the latter problem with
this edit, but I'm not really sure what template errors the documentation is talking about.
—PC
-XT
+
07:35, 17 November 2014 (UTC)
-- [[
User:Edokter]] {{
talk}}
21:05, 17 November 2014 (UTC)The result of the discussion was delete Martijn Hoekstra ( talk) 21:29, 25 November 2014 (UTC)
Unused except for two transclusions on historical
BOTREQ pages, where it appears the user wanted {{
BOTREQ|coding}}
instead. I'm not sure having a cleanup template referring to markup is a good idea in the first place; if someone is going to the effort of applying such a template, they may as well run the page through one of the many automatic-cleanup gadgets that are available, and spend a few seconds double-checking...
Reticulated Spline (
t •
c)
00:43, 17 November 2014 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was relisted on 2014 November 29. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:38, 29 November 2014 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 04:19, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
{{
100%}} outputs <span style="font-size:100%;>[...]</span>
, which is the equevilent of "do nothing with the font size". Therefor completely useless. Also, ambiguous, generic naming for all other templates. -- [[
User:Edokter]] {{
talk}}
09:55, 17 November 2014 (UTC)
-- [[
User:Edokter]] {{
talk}}
10:39, 17 November 2014 (UTC)
{{120%|Some text}}
does between code and page, after which subsequent encounters with {{[N]%|…}}
templates have a point of reference (even if curiosity and/or uncertainty hasn't already prompted an editor to visit the template page/s, encounter {{
resize}} and {{
Resize shortcuts}}, etc). Perhaps some more opinions are needed.
Sardanaphalus (
talk)
15:19, 17 November 2014 (UTC){{N%|…}}
with {{resize|N%|…}}
..?The result of the discussion was delete Martijn Hoekstra ( talk) 17:16, 23 November 2014 (UTC)
This is a newly created, yet unused, template to cross out words using <s>...</s>
. I see two problems with this. It is redundant to html tags s and del, and the documentation also mentions problems where <nowiki>...</nowiki>
tags are needed. I may have fixed the latter problem with
this edit, but I'm not really sure what template errors the documentation is talking about.
—PC
-XT
+
07:35, 17 November 2014 (UTC)
-- [[
User:Edokter]] {{
talk}}
21:05, 17 November 2014 (UTC)The result of the discussion was delete Martijn Hoekstra ( talk) 21:29, 25 November 2014 (UTC)
Unused except for two transclusions on historical
BOTREQ pages, where it appears the user wanted {{
BOTREQ|coding}}
instead. I'm not sure having a cleanup template referring to markup is a good idea in the first place; if someone is going to the effort of applying such a template, they may as well run the page through one of the many automatic-cleanup gadgets that are available, and spend a few seconds double-checking...
Reticulated Spline (
t •
c)
00:43, 17 November 2014 (UTC)