- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was relisted on 2014 April 8 Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 05:16, 8 April 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:49, 11 March 2014 (UTC)
Is AFC Under-14 football really that notable that a new template is needed? Fails WP:GNG JMHamo ( talk) 20:47, 3 March 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Giant Snowman 20:57, 3 March 2014 (UTC)
- Delete - a minor youth tournament, does not justify a navbox, especially given the low number of links. WP:NENAN. Giant Snowman 20:57, 3 March 2014 (UTC)
- delete, don't need it due to the low number of links. Frietjes ( talk) 23:21, 3 March 2014 (UTC)
- Delete - fewer than five links. Fenix down ( talk) 12:21, 4 March 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:50, 11 March 2014 (UTC)
- Template:Infobox LGU League ( talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Four transclusions, redundant to Template:Infobox organization. eh bien mon prince ( talk) 20:17, 3 March 2014 (UTC)
- delete after replacing ( sample replacement). Frietjes ( talk) 23:26, 3 March 2014 (UTC)
- Delete as redundant. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 12:50, 4 March 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:50, 11 March 2014 (UTC)
Outdated, no reason to have a navbox on this topic in 2014. Would we create navboxes on 50+ world cup circuits? Geschichte ( talk) 14:05, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
-
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 03:42, 3 March 2014 (UTC)
- delete, many venues will be used for more than one competition series, which would lead to an explosion of navboxes if we did this for every series of competitions. Frietjes ( talk) 23:27, 3 March 2014 (UTC)
- Delete, redundant to World Cup articles. And per reasoning above. -- Tone 15:22, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:50, 11 March 2014 (UTC)
- Template:Sojasun riders ( talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Per here and here. Just like Agritubel and Team RadioShack in those discussions, Sojasun is now a defunct cycling team, and in that regards, the template is now redundant. Craig (talk) 02:19, 3 March 2014 (UTC)
- delete, defunct. Frietjes ( talk) 23:28, 3 March 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:50, 11 March 2014 (UTC)
Not in use. Is the same as Template:Infobox Triathlon World Cup with the exception of the title. Debresser ( talk) 02:48, 3 March 2014 (UTC)
- Delete as redundant. Probably eligible for speedy deletion. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 14:45, 3 March 2014 (UTC)
- Delete per nom.-- eh bien mon prince ( talk) 19:13, 3 March 2014 (UTC)
- redirect Frietjes ( talk) 23:28, 3 March 2014 (UTC)
- Delete as redundant. ...William 15:40, 4 March 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was relisted on 2014 April 8 Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 05:16, 8 April 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:49, 11 March 2014 (UTC)
Is AFC Under-14 football really that notable that a new template is needed? Fails WP:GNG JMHamo ( talk) 20:47, 3 March 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Giant Snowman 20:57, 3 March 2014 (UTC)
- Delete - a minor youth tournament, does not justify a navbox, especially given the low number of links. WP:NENAN. Giant Snowman 20:57, 3 March 2014 (UTC)
- delete, don't need it due to the low number of links. Frietjes ( talk) 23:21, 3 March 2014 (UTC)
- Delete - fewer than five links. Fenix down ( talk) 12:21, 4 March 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:50, 11 March 2014 (UTC)
- Template:Infobox LGU League ( talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Four transclusions, redundant to Template:Infobox organization. eh bien mon prince ( talk) 20:17, 3 March 2014 (UTC)
- delete after replacing ( sample replacement). Frietjes ( talk) 23:26, 3 March 2014 (UTC)
- Delete as redundant. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 12:50, 4 March 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:50, 11 March 2014 (UTC)
Outdated, no reason to have a navbox on this topic in 2014. Would we create navboxes on 50+ world cup circuits? Geschichte ( talk) 14:05, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
-
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 03:42, 3 March 2014 (UTC)
- delete, many venues will be used for more than one competition series, which would lead to an explosion of navboxes if we did this for every series of competitions. Frietjes ( talk) 23:27, 3 March 2014 (UTC)
- Delete, redundant to World Cup articles. And per reasoning above. -- Tone 15:22, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:50, 11 March 2014 (UTC)
- Template:Sojasun riders ( talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Per here and here. Just like Agritubel and Team RadioShack in those discussions, Sojasun is now a defunct cycling team, and in that regards, the template is now redundant. Craig (talk) 02:19, 3 March 2014 (UTC)
- delete, defunct. Frietjes ( talk) 23:28, 3 March 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:50, 11 March 2014 (UTC)
Not in use. Is the same as Template:Infobox Triathlon World Cup with the exception of the title. Debresser ( talk) 02:48, 3 March 2014 (UTC)
- Delete as redundant. Probably eligible for speedy deletion. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 14:45, 3 March 2014 (UTC)
- Delete per nom.-- eh bien mon prince ( talk) 19:13, 3 March 2014 (UTC)
- redirect Frietjes ( talk) 23:28, 3 March 2014 (UTC)
- Delete as redundant. ...William 15:40, 4 March 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.