- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was no consensus Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 06:26, 6 April 2014 (UTC)
- Template:WW1InfoBox ( talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
One one transclusion: Hardcode/subst: it into the article and delete as a separate template. — Justin (koavf)❤ T☮ C☺ M☯ 23:09, 20 March 2014 (UTC)
- Merge with the article and delete it per nom.— eh bien mon prince ( talk) 08:03, 21 March 2014 (UTC)
- Keep - Serves a valuable purpose for editing, allowing the article to be edited separately, and to keep the long infobox code out of the article. RGloucester — ☎ 13:54, 21 March 2014 (UTC)
- Keep per RGloucester and WP:NOTBURO/ WP:IAR. ~~ Lothar von Richthofen ( talk) 20:41, 21 March 2014 (UTC)
- Subst and delete Unnecessary wrapper for {{ Infobox military conflict}}. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 20:45, 21 March 2014 (UTC)
- merge with the article and delete, can preserve the edit history behind an article redirect if necessary. Frietjes ( talk) 19:44, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
- Keep. It is useful to separate the infobox from the rest of the article for editing purposes. It also allows the highly visible infobox to be protected differently from the rest of the article. Srnec ( talk) 20:16, 29 March 2014 (UTC)
- Keep, becuse it's practical to let it stay separate from the long WWI article. It's also unlikely that it's going to be extensively modified in the future. - Anonimski ( talk) 21:25, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
- Keep Having a separate infobox for such a high profile articles makes sense. walk victor falk talk 20:00, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was no consensus Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 06:26, 6 April 2014 (UTC)
- Template:WW1InfoBox ( talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
One one transclusion: Hardcode/subst: it into the article and delete as a separate template. — Justin (koavf)❤ T☮ C☺ M☯ 23:09, 20 March 2014 (UTC)
- Merge with the article and delete it per nom.— eh bien mon prince ( talk) 08:03, 21 March 2014 (UTC)
- Keep - Serves a valuable purpose for editing, allowing the article to be edited separately, and to keep the long infobox code out of the article. RGloucester — ☎ 13:54, 21 March 2014 (UTC)
- Keep per RGloucester and WP:NOTBURO/ WP:IAR. ~~ Lothar von Richthofen ( talk) 20:41, 21 March 2014 (UTC)
- Subst and delete Unnecessary wrapper for {{ Infobox military conflict}}. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 20:45, 21 March 2014 (UTC)
- merge with the article and delete, can preserve the edit history behind an article redirect if necessary. Frietjes ( talk) 19:44, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
- Keep. It is useful to separate the infobox from the rest of the article for editing purposes. It also allows the highly visible infobox to be protected differently from the rest of the article. Srnec ( talk) 20:16, 29 March 2014 (UTC)
- Keep, becuse it's practical to let it stay separate from the long WWI article. It's also unlikely that it's going to be extensively modified in the future. - Anonimski ( talk) 21:25, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
- Keep Having a separate infobox for such a high profile articles makes sense. walk victor falk talk 20:00, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.