The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:48, 13 July 2014 (UTC)
Policy concern, namely that it may BITE new users? Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 16:35, 5 July 2014 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:49, 13 July 2014 (UTC)
Seemingly used to mmark where NFUR have been generated with FURME or other tools. Seemingly created originalyl in connection with a rejected bot proposal for autogeneration of NFUR's (which was considered against policy) Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 16:23, 5 July 2014 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:50, 13 July 2014 (UTC)
BITEy, At the very least the language needs a re-tone, WP doesn't currently need model/consent releases for otherwise legal photos, so there is a concern this may be outside policy. Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 16:21, 5 July 2014 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:50, 13 July 2014 (UTC)
Concerns that this may not be within current policy. Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 16:19, 5 July 2014 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:50, 13 July 2014 (UTC)
Whilst in use, considered to BITEy, and WP:NOTSOAPBOX Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 16:18, 5 July 2014 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted as G7 by Jenks24 ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 18:11, 5 July 2014 (UTC)
Was created to standardise a number of items tagged with a particualr license. TfD as that task was nominaly completed. Not seemingly in use as this template normally subst. Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 16:14, 5 July 2014 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:51, 13 July 2014 (UTC)
Seemingly unused, so wondering if this (own creation) is duplicated by another template? Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 16:13, 5 July 2014 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was relisted on 2014 July 13 Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:52, 13 July 2014 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:53, 13 July 2014 (UTC)
These two English football competitions both closed down at the end of last season, so templates listing the member clubs are no longer required. ChrisTheDude ( talk) 08:37, 5 July 2014 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:53, 13 July 2014 (UTC)
No content is produced when any of these templates are transcluded. They appear to have no purpose Jackmcbarn ( talk) 02:39, 5 July 2014 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was no consensus, and I am pretty sure userboxes are still discussed at MFD? Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:54, 13 July 2014 (UTC)
Propose merging
Template:Linkin Park logo with
Template:User Linkin Park.
Template:Linkin Park logo isn't used anywhere other than in
Template:User Linkin Park, and there doesn't seem to be anywhere else where it would be useful.
Jackmcbarn (
talk)
02:27, 5 July 2014 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 02:26, 13 July 2014 (UTC)
Orphaned, and I can't think of anywhere this would be useful Jackmcbarn ( talk) 02:26, 5 July 2014 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:58, 13 July 2014 (UTC)
Not enough links; see WP:NENAN Jackmcbarn ( talk) 02:16, 5 July 2014 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:48, 13 July 2014 (UTC)
Policy concern, namely that it may BITE new users? Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 16:35, 5 July 2014 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:49, 13 July 2014 (UTC)
Seemingly used to mmark where NFUR have been generated with FURME or other tools. Seemingly created originalyl in connection with a rejected bot proposal for autogeneration of NFUR's (which was considered against policy) Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 16:23, 5 July 2014 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:50, 13 July 2014 (UTC)
BITEy, At the very least the language needs a re-tone, WP doesn't currently need model/consent releases for otherwise legal photos, so there is a concern this may be outside policy. Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 16:21, 5 July 2014 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:50, 13 July 2014 (UTC)
Concerns that this may not be within current policy. Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 16:19, 5 July 2014 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:50, 13 July 2014 (UTC)
Whilst in use, considered to BITEy, and WP:NOTSOAPBOX Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 16:18, 5 July 2014 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted as G7 by Jenks24 ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 18:11, 5 July 2014 (UTC)
Was created to standardise a number of items tagged with a particualr license. TfD as that task was nominaly completed. Not seemingly in use as this template normally subst. Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 16:14, 5 July 2014 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:51, 13 July 2014 (UTC)
Seemingly unused, so wondering if this (own creation) is duplicated by another template? Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 16:13, 5 July 2014 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was relisted on 2014 July 13 Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:52, 13 July 2014 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:53, 13 July 2014 (UTC)
These two English football competitions both closed down at the end of last season, so templates listing the member clubs are no longer required. ChrisTheDude ( talk) 08:37, 5 July 2014 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:53, 13 July 2014 (UTC)
No content is produced when any of these templates are transcluded. They appear to have no purpose Jackmcbarn ( talk) 02:39, 5 July 2014 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was no consensus, and I am pretty sure userboxes are still discussed at MFD? Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:54, 13 July 2014 (UTC)
Propose merging
Template:Linkin Park logo with
Template:User Linkin Park.
Template:Linkin Park logo isn't used anywhere other than in
Template:User Linkin Park, and there doesn't seem to be anywhere else where it would be useful.
Jackmcbarn (
talk)
02:27, 5 July 2014 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 02:26, 13 July 2014 (UTC)
Orphaned, and I can't think of anywhere this would be useful Jackmcbarn ( talk) 02:26, 5 July 2014 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:58, 13 July 2014 (UTC)
Not enough links; see WP:NENAN Jackmcbarn ( talk) 02:16, 5 July 2014 (UTC)