The result of the discussion was delete, due to the significant duplication. Feel free to continue the discussion (concerning alternatives to resolve the duplication) elsewhere. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 21:18, 27 July 2014 (UTC)
Subjective groups of disparate items which are adequately covered by Templates like {{ Navbox GO Transit}}, {{ Toronto passenger railways}} and {{ Public transit systems in Canada}}. Also see Wikipedia:Template creep. Secondarywaltz ( talk) 14:40, 5 July 2014 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was no consensus Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 06:26, 27 July 2014 (UTC)
Unused and apparently broken (I made several tests and seems not to work correctly) template created by a basically retired editor. We already have several
progress templates which work properly and serve the same function.
Cavarrone
17:45, 13 July 2014 (UTC)
{{
percentile|50}}
{{
percentile|75}}
{{
percentile|10}}
-- 65.94.171.126 ( talk) 04:00, 14 July 2014 (UTC)
{{
percentile|33|width=500|height=20|text-size=10|progress-done-colour=steelblue|progress-tbd-colour=indianred}}
-- 65.94.171.126 ( talk) 04:51, 14 July 2014 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 03:26, 21 July 2014 (UTC)
Unused template created by a basically retired editor, frankly I have no idea what this is supposed to mean. Cavarrone 17:27, 13 July 2014 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted as G6 by Bearian ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 20:14, 14 July 2014 (UTC)
documentation subpage for a non-existing template created by a basically retired editor, lacks sense. Cavarrone 17:11, 13 July 2014 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was no consensus Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 21:14, 27 July 2014 (UTC)
Redirects, by definition, point to articles of a "similar topic or related term", so the main problem with this template is that it's obvious and self-evident, and doesn't add any new information to the process of categorizing redirects. We also already have {{
R from related word}}
and other more specific sorting templates, which makes the nominated template largely redundant as well.
Netoholic
@
04:57, 13 July 2014 (UTC)
{{
R from related word}}
refers to a single "word" not a multi-word topic. Keep template, as documented and used in over 4,500 pages for years, to avoid
wp:Disruption of editing. -
Wikid77 (
talk)
13:58, 13 July 2014 (UTC)
{{
R from related word}}
specifically says in the text "word (or phrase)". --
Netoholic
@
08:08, 14 July 2014 (UTC)
{{
R from related word}}
specifically says that it is for term definitions. It is not applicable to, eg.
iphone linux or
NotAllMen. —
Dmitrij D. Czarkoff (
talk•
track)
09:33, 14 July 2014 (UTC)
{{
R from related word}}
, so your point is incorrect. It suggests that a wikitionary link may sometimes be better than a redirect, but that is all. --
Netoholic
@
19:26, 14 July 2014 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 03:16, 21 July 2014 (UTC)
At Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject Awards and prizes#Grammy Award templates there seems to be agreement that no templates should exist other than the four major awards. The rest of the awards are basically subcategories of the main four. TonyTheTiger ( T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 04:18, 13 July 2014 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete, due to the significant duplication. Feel free to continue the discussion (concerning alternatives to resolve the duplication) elsewhere. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 21:18, 27 July 2014 (UTC)
Subjective groups of disparate items which are adequately covered by Templates like {{ Navbox GO Transit}}, {{ Toronto passenger railways}} and {{ Public transit systems in Canada}}. Also see Wikipedia:Template creep. Secondarywaltz ( talk) 14:40, 5 July 2014 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was no consensus Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 06:26, 27 July 2014 (UTC)
Unused and apparently broken (I made several tests and seems not to work correctly) template created by a basically retired editor. We already have several
progress templates which work properly and serve the same function.
Cavarrone
17:45, 13 July 2014 (UTC)
{{
percentile|50}}
{{
percentile|75}}
{{
percentile|10}}
-- 65.94.171.126 ( talk) 04:00, 14 July 2014 (UTC)
{{
percentile|33|width=500|height=20|text-size=10|progress-done-colour=steelblue|progress-tbd-colour=indianred}}
-- 65.94.171.126 ( talk) 04:51, 14 July 2014 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 03:26, 21 July 2014 (UTC)
Unused template created by a basically retired editor, frankly I have no idea what this is supposed to mean. Cavarrone 17:27, 13 July 2014 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted as G6 by Bearian ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 20:14, 14 July 2014 (UTC)
documentation subpage for a non-existing template created by a basically retired editor, lacks sense. Cavarrone 17:11, 13 July 2014 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was no consensus Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 21:14, 27 July 2014 (UTC)
Redirects, by definition, point to articles of a "similar topic or related term", so the main problem with this template is that it's obvious and self-evident, and doesn't add any new information to the process of categorizing redirects. We also already have {{
R from related word}}
and other more specific sorting templates, which makes the nominated template largely redundant as well.
Netoholic
@
04:57, 13 July 2014 (UTC)
{{
R from related word}}
refers to a single "word" not a multi-word topic. Keep template, as documented and used in over 4,500 pages for years, to avoid
wp:Disruption of editing. -
Wikid77 (
talk)
13:58, 13 July 2014 (UTC)
{{
R from related word}}
specifically says in the text "word (or phrase)". --
Netoholic
@
08:08, 14 July 2014 (UTC)
{{
R from related word}}
specifically says that it is for term definitions. It is not applicable to, eg.
iphone linux or
NotAllMen. —
Dmitrij D. Czarkoff (
talk•
track)
09:33, 14 July 2014 (UTC)
{{
R from related word}}
, so your point is incorrect. It suggests that a wikitionary link may sometimes be better than a redirect, but that is all. --
Netoholic
@
19:26, 14 July 2014 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 03:16, 21 July 2014 (UTC)
At Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject Awards and prizes#Grammy Award templates there seems to be agreement that no templates should exist other than the four major awards. The rest of the awards are basically subcategories of the main four. TonyTheTiger ( T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 04:18, 13 July 2014 (UTC)