From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

September 5

Template:Agritourism in Europe

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete  Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:02, 16 September 2013 (UTC) reply

Template:Agritourism in Europe ( talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Countries in topic template where only one link ( Agritourism in Serbia) exists. OwenBlacker ( Talk) 20:44, 5 September 2013 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Fb match3

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete  Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:04, 16 September 2013 (UTC) reply

Template:Fb match3 ( talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused template Brayan Jaimes ( talk) 19:58, 5 September 2013 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:LDSfirstpresidency

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was merged  Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:05, 16 September 2013 (UTC) reply

Template:LDSfirstpresidency ( talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:LDSfirstpresidency ( talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:LDSfirstpresidencyCURRENT ( talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:LDSfpsec ( talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

These four templates all concern the First Presidency of the LDS Church and as such they end up cross sharing the same pages. I have done similar merges in the past, but not so many at once, so I just had to make some adjustments to incorporate the proper wording. Therefore I have done the coding and you can see how they would be merged together in my userspace

User:ARTEST4ECHO/sandbox2 - Examples and future documentation
User:ARTEST4ECHO/template - Actual coding

If you note, if any of the current versions can of the templates will still be available, if desired, however, I would suspect that they wont be used much. Additionally if there are any concerns or suggestion I would be willing to implement them. -- ARTEST4ECHO ( talk/ contribs) 16:09, 5 September 2013 (UTC) reply

All done-- ARTEST4ECHO ( talk/ contribs) 18:16, 12 September 2013 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Portal bar

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was update the portal bar template to either use the same lua module as {{ portal}}, or to use the portal bar module, which ever is deemed most appropriate.  Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 04:03, 16 September 2013 (UTC) reply

Template:Portal bar ( talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Portal ( talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Propose merging Template:Portal bar with Template:Portal.
Its function is similar to {{ Portal}}. We can safely merge this into {{ Portal}} by adding bar parameter. Rezonansowy ( talk • contribs) 14:50, 5 September 2013 (UTC) reply

That's the reassurance I wanted. My initial opposition was based on my belief that every single page currently utilizing portal bar would have to be changed (either manually or by bot); it'd be extremely inconvenient given the number of articles I've added portal bar to. Thank you for clearing things up; I've struck out my oppose vote accordingly. — Bloom6132 ( talk) 16:28, 14 September 2013 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Translit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was relisted on Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2013 September 17Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:41, 17 September 2013 (UTC) reply

Template:Translit ( talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Competition

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was relisted on Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2013 September 17Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:42, 17 September 2013 (UTC) reply

Template:Competition ( talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Air India FC

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete  Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:43, 17 September 2013 (UTC) reply

Template:Air India FC ( talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Only three links, all of which are already linked in the club article, diffcult to see how this is of any real use. Fenix down ( talk) 08:46, 5 September 2013 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Giant Snowman 09:52, 5 September 2013 (UTC) reply
  • Nominator Delete: Meh, with the club out of the I-League forever and the fact that lower division football in India is non-existent (at least where Air India play it is) then ya, delete the template. It will probably get smaller anyway. -- ArsenalFan700 ( talk) 01:37, 8 September 2013 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Al-Ahly Benghazi

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete  Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 02:16, 16 September 2013 (UTC) reply

Template:Al-Ahly Benghazi ( talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Only four links, one of which is to a section in an article already linked. Not everything needs a navbox. Fenix down ( talk) 08:45, 5 September 2013 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Giant Snowman 09:52, 5 September 2013 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Phoenix FC

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete  Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 02:15, 16 September 2013 (UTC) reply

Template:Phoenix FC ( talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Navbox being used more like infobox. Contains only five links of which two are links to sections within the main club article and one is a duplicate of the 2013 season link. Difficult to see how this is a useful navbox. Fenix down ( talk) 08:43, 5 September 2013 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Giant Snowman 09:52, 5 September 2013 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:F.C. New York

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete  Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 02:13, 16 September 2013 (UTC) reply

Template:F.C. New York ( talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Navbox being used more like infobox. Contains only six links of which two are links to sections within the main club article, one is a duplicate of the 2011 season link and one a link to the general FC New York Category page which is atthe bottom of all relevant articles anyway. Difficult to see how this is a useful navbox and as the club has now been dissolved it is difficult to see how it can be expanded in any useful way in the future. Fenix down ( talk) 08:32, 5 September 2013 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Giant Snowman 09:52, 5 September 2013 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:FK AS Trenčín

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete  Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 02:07, 16 September 2013 (UTC) reply

Template:FK AS Trenčín ( talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

contains only four links, two of which are to sections within the original club article, difficult to see how this is a useful navbox. Fenix down ( talk) 08:26, 5 September 2013 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Giant Snowman 09:52, 5 September 2013 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:FC Unirea Urziceni

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete  Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 02:06, 16 September 2013 (UTC) reply

Template:FC Unirea Urziceni ( talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Removed one link to a non-related article. Navbox only contains four links, one of which is the club itself, one to the players category, one to an old ground and a final one to the current ground (which is alredy linked in the club article). Hard to see how this is a helpful aid to navigation. Fenix down ( talk) 08:19, 5 September 2013 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Giant Snowman 09:52, 5 September 2013 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Fb federation Hungary

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete  Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:06, 16 September 2013 (UTC) reply

Template:Fb federation Hungary ( talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused template Brayan Jaimes ( talk) 02:03, 5 September 2013 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Giant Snowman 09:52, 5 September 2013 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

September 5

Template:Agritourism in Europe

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete  Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:02, 16 September 2013 (UTC) reply

Template:Agritourism in Europe ( talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Countries in topic template where only one link ( Agritourism in Serbia) exists. OwenBlacker ( Talk) 20:44, 5 September 2013 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Fb match3

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete  Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:04, 16 September 2013 (UTC) reply

Template:Fb match3 ( talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused template Brayan Jaimes ( talk) 19:58, 5 September 2013 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:LDSfirstpresidency

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was merged  Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:05, 16 September 2013 (UTC) reply

Template:LDSfirstpresidency ( talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:LDSfirstpresidency ( talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:LDSfirstpresidencyCURRENT ( talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:LDSfpsec ( talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

These four templates all concern the First Presidency of the LDS Church and as such they end up cross sharing the same pages. I have done similar merges in the past, but not so many at once, so I just had to make some adjustments to incorporate the proper wording. Therefore I have done the coding and you can see how they would be merged together in my userspace

User:ARTEST4ECHO/sandbox2 - Examples and future documentation
User:ARTEST4ECHO/template - Actual coding

If you note, if any of the current versions can of the templates will still be available, if desired, however, I would suspect that they wont be used much. Additionally if there are any concerns or suggestion I would be willing to implement them. -- ARTEST4ECHO ( talk/ contribs) 16:09, 5 September 2013 (UTC) reply

All done-- ARTEST4ECHO ( talk/ contribs) 18:16, 12 September 2013 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Portal bar

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was update the portal bar template to either use the same lua module as {{ portal}}, or to use the portal bar module, which ever is deemed most appropriate.  Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 04:03, 16 September 2013 (UTC) reply

Template:Portal bar ( talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Portal ( talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Propose merging Template:Portal bar with Template:Portal.
Its function is similar to {{ Portal}}. We can safely merge this into {{ Portal}} by adding bar parameter. Rezonansowy ( talk • contribs) 14:50, 5 September 2013 (UTC) reply

That's the reassurance I wanted. My initial opposition was based on my belief that every single page currently utilizing portal bar would have to be changed (either manually or by bot); it'd be extremely inconvenient given the number of articles I've added portal bar to. Thank you for clearing things up; I've struck out my oppose vote accordingly. — Bloom6132 ( talk) 16:28, 14 September 2013 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Translit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was relisted on Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2013 September 17Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:41, 17 September 2013 (UTC) reply

Template:Translit ( talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Competition

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was relisted on Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2013 September 17Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:42, 17 September 2013 (UTC) reply

Template:Competition ( talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Air India FC

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete  Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:43, 17 September 2013 (UTC) reply

Template:Air India FC ( talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Only three links, all of which are already linked in the club article, diffcult to see how this is of any real use. Fenix down ( talk) 08:46, 5 September 2013 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Giant Snowman 09:52, 5 September 2013 (UTC) reply
  • Nominator Delete: Meh, with the club out of the I-League forever and the fact that lower division football in India is non-existent (at least where Air India play it is) then ya, delete the template. It will probably get smaller anyway. -- ArsenalFan700 ( talk) 01:37, 8 September 2013 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Al-Ahly Benghazi

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete  Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 02:16, 16 September 2013 (UTC) reply

Template:Al-Ahly Benghazi ( talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Only four links, one of which is to a section in an article already linked. Not everything needs a navbox. Fenix down ( talk) 08:45, 5 September 2013 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Giant Snowman 09:52, 5 September 2013 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Phoenix FC

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete  Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 02:15, 16 September 2013 (UTC) reply

Template:Phoenix FC ( talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Navbox being used more like infobox. Contains only five links of which two are links to sections within the main club article and one is a duplicate of the 2013 season link. Difficult to see how this is a useful navbox. Fenix down ( talk) 08:43, 5 September 2013 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Giant Snowman 09:52, 5 September 2013 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:F.C. New York

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete  Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 02:13, 16 September 2013 (UTC) reply

Template:F.C. New York ( talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Navbox being used more like infobox. Contains only six links of which two are links to sections within the main club article, one is a duplicate of the 2011 season link and one a link to the general FC New York Category page which is atthe bottom of all relevant articles anyway. Difficult to see how this is a useful navbox and as the club has now been dissolved it is difficult to see how it can be expanded in any useful way in the future. Fenix down ( talk) 08:32, 5 September 2013 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Giant Snowman 09:52, 5 September 2013 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:FK AS Trenčín

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete  Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 02:07, 16 September 2013 (UTC) reply

Template:FK AS Trenčín ( talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

contains only four links, two of which are to sections within the original club article, difficult to see how this is a useful navbox. Fenix down ( talk) 08:26, 5 September 2013 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Giant Snowman 09:52, 5 September 2013 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:FC Unirea Urziceni

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete  Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 02:06, 16 September 2013 (UTC) reply

Template:FC Unirea Urziceni ( talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Removed one link to a non-related article. Navbox only contains four links, one of which is the club itself, one to the players category, one to an old ground and a final one to the current ground (which is alredy linked in the club article). Hard to see how this is a helpful aid to navigation. Fenix down ( talk) 08:19, 5 September 2013 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Giant Snowman 09:52, 5 September 2013 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Fb federation Hungary

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete  Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:06, 16 September 2013 (UTC) reply

Template:Fb federation Hungary ( talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused template Brayan Jaimes ( talk) 02:03, 5 September 2013 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Giant Snowman 09:52, 5 September 2013 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook