The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:01, 16 September 2013 (UTC)
Unused template Brayan Jaimes ( talk) 23:13, 4 September 2013 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:00, 16 September 2013 (UTC)
Unused template Brayan Jaimes ( talk) 23:06, 4 September 2013 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted as T3 by Trödel ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 13:53, 5 September 2013 (UTC)
I am not sure what the creator was trying to do when he/she created this template, but it was only used on one page, and it was very easily replaced using the Standard Infobox person template. It is now no longer used. -- ARTEST4ECHO ( talk/ contribs) 20:03, 4 September 2013 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was relisted on Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2013 September 17. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:50, 17 September 2013 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was merged Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:00, 16 September 2013 (UTC)
Propose merging
Template:LDSpresidingbishopric with
Template:LDSpresidingbishop.
I think that
Template:LDSpresidingbishop and
Template:LDSpresidingbishopric should be merged. After all the Presiding Bishop is part of the Presiding Bishopric so the page is actually incomplete. It would look like this.
-- ARTEST4ECHO ( talk/ contribs) 19:43, 4 September 2013 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted as T3 by Trödel ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 13:53, 5 September 2013 (UTC)
Template has been unused for some time. All pages that used this template were moved to Template:List LDS Temple USA Southwest Map. In a nutshell it is obsolete. -- ARTEST4ECHO ( talk/ contribs) 18:58, 4 September 2013 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted as G7 by Nyttend ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 20:20, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
This navbox win the "Most Pointless Navbox" award. It is nothing but a collection of indiscriminate links, some of them are external. Besides, it is only used (and only usable) on one article, so no need for template at all. Two links in it that you might be interested in keeping are already used repeatedly in Maxthon article. Codename Lisa ( talk) 16:43, 4 September 2013 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was relisted on Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2013 September 17. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:53, 17 September 2013 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:25, 16 September 2013 (UTC)
Several hundred edits later, all articles about South African towns are using the new Template:Infobox South African town 2011 and relative metadata templates. The templates above are now orphaned and serve no further purpose. I'm also nominating Template:Infobox South African town (currently a redirect) so that we can move the new template to that name. eh bien mon prince ( talk) 14:54, 4 September 2013 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was relisted on Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2013 September 17. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:56, 17 September 2013 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:24, 16 September 2013 (UTC)
Unused template with coding errors to begin with. Seems like a trial and error creation left for dead. Jrcla2 ( talk) 12:28, 4 September 2013 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:00, 17 September 2013 (UTC)
Little used sidebars, mostly redundant to one another. Can be better handled by an adapted {{ Arabic alphabet}} with lists like in {{ Infobox Cyrillic letter}} (if necessary); however, there's already a giant sidebar that's up for merging in Semitic letter articles (e.g. see Taw), and I don't think we should add more. — Lfdder ( talk) 11:26, 4 September 2013 (UTC)
Issues addressed |
---|
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it. |
|
The result of the discussion was wrong venue, feel free to relist it at MFD if you still want it deleted. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:24, 16 September 2013 (UTC)
Unused and uneeded template. No encyclopedic value that would justify it being kept Kumioko ( talk) 01:03, 4 September 2013 (UTC
The result of the discussion was wrong venue, feel free to relist it at MFD if you still want it deleted. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:22, 16 September 2013 (UTC)
Unused template. No longer needed. Kumioko ( talk) 01:01, 4 September 2013 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. See bottom for my reasoning. Nyttend ( talk) 18:56, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
Unused template. Not needed and in addition Albania isn't part of NATO Kumioko ( talk) 00:51, 4 September 2013 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:01, 16 September 2013 (UTC)
Unused template Brayan Jaimes ( talk) 23:13, 4 September 2013 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:00, 16 September 2013 (UTC)
Unused template Brayan Jaimes ( talk) 23:06, 4 September 2013 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted as T3 by Trödel ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 13:53, 5 September 2013 (UTC)
I am not sure what the creator was trying to do when he/she created this template, but it was only used on one page, and it was very easily replaced using the Standard Infobox person template. It is now no longer used. -- ARTEST4ECHO ( talk/ contribs) 20:03, 4 September 2013 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was relisted on Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2013 September 17. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:50, 17 September 2013 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was merged Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:00, 16 September 2013 (UTC)
Propose merging
Template:LDSpresidingbishopric with
Template:LDSpresidingbishop.
I think that
Template:LDSpresidingbishop and
Template:LDSpresidingbishopric should be merged. After all the Presiding Bishop is part of the Presiding Bishopric so the page is actually incomplete. It would look like this.
-- ARTEST4ECHO ( talk/ contribs) 19:43, 4 September 2013 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted as T3 by Trödel ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 13:53, 5 September 2013 (UTC)
Template has been unused for some time. All pages that used this template were moved to Template:List LDS Temple USA Southwest Map. In a nutshell it is obsolete. -- ARTEST4ECHO ( talk/ contribs) 18:58, 4 September 2013 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted as G7 by Nyttend ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 20:20, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
This navbox win the "Most Pointless Navbox" award. It is nothing but a collection of indiscriminate links, some of them are external. Besides, it is only used (and only usable) on one article, so no need for template at all. Two links in it that you might be interested in keeping are already used repeatedly in Maxthon article. Codename Lisa ( talk) 16:43, 4 September 2013 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was relisted on Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2013 September 17. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:53, 17 September 2013 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:25, 16 September 2013 (UTC)
Several hundred edits later, all articles about South African towns are using the new Template:Infobox South African town 2011 and relative metadata templates. The templates above are now orphaned and serve no further purpose. I'm also nominating Template:Infobox South African town (currently a redirect) so that we can move the new template to that name. eh bien mon prince ( talk) 14:54, 4 September 2013 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was relisted on Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2013 September 17. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:56, 17 September 2013 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:24, 16 September 2013 (UTC)
Unused template with coding errors to begin with. Seems like a trial and error creation left for dead. Jrcla2 ( talk) 12:28, 4 September 2013 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:00, 17 September 2013 (UTC)
Little used sidebars, mostly redundant to one another. Can be better handled by an adapted {{ Arabic alphabet}} with lists like in {{ Infobox Cyrillic letter}} (if necessary); however, there's already a giant sidebar that's up for merging in Semitic letter articles (e.g. see Taw), and I don't think we should add more. — Lfdder ( talk) 11:26, 4 September 2013 (UTC)
Issues addressed |
---|
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it. |
|
The result of the discussion was wrong venue, feel free to relist it at MFD if you still want it deleted. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:24, 16 September 2013 (UTC)
Unused and uneeded template. No encyclopedic value that would justify it being kept Kumioko ( talk) 01:03, 4 September 2013 (UTC
The result of the discussion was wrong venue, feel free to relist it at MFD if you still want it deleted. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:22, 16 September 2013 (UTC)
Unused template. No longer needed. Kumioko ( talk) 01:01, 4 September 2013 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. See bottom for my reasoning. Nyttend ( talk) 18:56, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
Unused template. Not needed and in addition Albania isn't part of NATO Kumioko ( talk) 00:51, 4 September 2013 (UTC)