The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete  Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 21:46, 28 September 2013 (UTC) reply

Template:Grey's Anatomy episode count ( talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Useless template - does nothing that text cannot. Taylor Trescott - ^{my talk} + _{my edits} 23:17, 18 September 2013 (UTC) reply

• delete Frietjes ( talk) 23:37, 18 September 2013 (UTC) reply
• Delete, only one use in the main space. 117Avenue ( talk) 04:21, 22 September 2013 (UTC) reply
• Delete. Numbers can be inserted manually. -- Wikipedical ( talk) 06:12, 24 September 2013 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was no consensus  Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 22:16, 28 September 2013 (UTC) reply

Template:South Park episode count ( talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Useless template - does nothing that text cannot. Taylor Trescott - ^{my talk} + _{my edits} 23:15, 18 September 2013 (UTC) reply

• comment, the point here is probably to avoid updating the number in more than one article. could possibly be done using LST, or WikiData? Frietjes ( talk) 23:40, 18 September 2013 (UTC) reply
  • Using WikiData is not an option, since statements can only be retrieved on a single page per wiki.-- eh bien mon prince ( talk) 17:38, 19 September 2013 (UTC) reply
• Keep. It does exactly what a template is supposed to do, add data to multiple pages which can be sourced and edited in one place. 117Avenue ( talk) 03:39, 19 September 2013 (UTC) reply
• Delete. Numbers can be inserted manually. -- Wikipedical ( talk) 06:12, 24 September 2013 (UTC) reply
• Strong Keep per 117Avenue. Grapesoda22 ( talk) 18:18, 28 September 2013 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was no consensus  Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 22:15, 28 September 2013 (UTC) reply

Template:The Simpsons episode count ( talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Useless template - does nothing that text cannot. Taylor Trescott - ^{my talk} + _{my edits} 23:15, 18 September 2013 (UTC) reply

• comment, the point here is probably to avoid updating the number in more than one article. could possibly be done using LST, or WikiData? Frietjes ( talk) 23:40, 18 September 2013 (UTC) reply
• If there is a way to use LST or WikiData to generate the episode count, this template can go. Otherwise it should be kept as it saves the pain of updating multiple articles whenever a new episode airs. For reference, there was a previous discussion at Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2012 March 5#Template:The Simpsons episode count which resulted in the template being speedily kept. Dough 48 72 00:10, 19 September 2013 (UTC) reply
• Keep. It does exactly what a template is supposed to do, add data to multiple pages which can be sourced and edited in one place. 117Avenue ( talk) 03:40, 19 September 2013 (UTC) reply
• Delete. Numbers can be inserted manually. -- Wikipedical ( talk) 06:13, 24 September 2013 (UTC) reply
• Strong Keep per 117Avenue. Grapesoda22 ( talk) 18:19, 28 September 2013 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was no consensus  Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 22:15, 28 September 2013 (UTC) reply

Template:Aqua Teen Hunger Force episode count ( talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Useless template - does nothing that text cannot. Taylor Trescott - ^{my talk} + _{my edits} 23:14, 18 September 2013 (UTC) reply

• Keep. It does exactly what a template is supposed to do, add data to multiple pages which can be sourced and edited in one place. 117Avenue ( talk) 03:40, 19 September 2013 (UTC) reply
• Delete. Numbers can be inserted manually. -- Wikipedical ( talk) 06:12, 24 September 2013 (UTC) reply
• Strong Keep per 117Avenue. Grapesoda22 ( talk) 18:19, 28 September 2013 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete  Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 21:48, 28 September 2013 (UTC) reply

Template:Infobox classic ( talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

fork of {{ infobox}} with no benefits and more complicated syntax, just change "Row # info" -> "data#" and "Row # title" -> "label#", and you have the same thing as {{infobox}}. but, why would use even do that when this is redundant to less generic templates like {{ infobox company}}. entirely pointless. 174.56.57.138 ( talk) 14:06, 18 September 2013 (UTC) reply

• Comment you're not supposed to use it directly, it's supposed to be used to build another template, that you then use. -- 70.24.249.39 ( talk) 22:14, 18 September 2013 (UTC) reply
  • Delete newly created template replicating functionality of an existing template. -- 70.24.249.39 ( talk) 04:17, 19 September 2013 (UTC) reply
• comment why was this created? Frietjes ( talk) 23:41, 18 September 2013 (UTC) reply
  • Comment the nominator messed with the templates's documentation [1] -- 70.24.249.39 ( talk) 04:12, 19 September 2013 (UTC) reply
    • seems like an accurate change, especially the removal of Category:Lua-based templates, and fixing the transclusions of Category:General wiki templates and Category:Infobox templates in every article using the template. Frietjes ( talk) 18:41, 19 September 2013 (UTC) reply
      • It was huggled as vandalism [2] , which I assume isn't because of fixing the category membership. -- 70.24.249.39 ( talk) 05:06, 20 September 2013 (UTC) reply
• Delete forking a template used on over a million pages without adding any functionality is a really bad idea.-- eh bien mon prince ( talk) 02:10, 20 September 2013 (UTC) reply
• Comment I don't think this page has any bad terms. As a matter of fact, I do no think this page should be deleted or anything. If you have further to say please, please tell. As a consequence I'm removing that notice from the page. — ITeachThem ( talk) 10:53, 20 September 2013 (UTC) reply
  • I restored the notice, it stays in place while the discussion is still open. you should address the reason why there is the need to fork {{ infobox}}. Frietjes ( talk) 14:38, 20 September 2013 (UTC) reply
• Conclusion This infobox is used for some personal use. If you think this is complicated or a copy of {{infobox}}, then you are wrong. I'm removing the notice from the template. — Armun Alam ( talk) 9:25, 21 September 2013 (UTC)
• Delete A fork shouldn't be sustained over "personal" use, to quote the above. Mackensen (talk) 12:23, 21 September 2013 (UTC) reply
• Comment I just came here for a negotiation, not to get myself into a battle. I don't know why you are so stubborn to delete this template. This is no loss if you stop this quarrel. I want to reach a better consensus for this template. My question is, why are you trying to delete it? Really guys, this isn't a joke! — ITeachThem ( talk) 15:53, 21 September 2013 (UTC) reply
  • Well, the first thing you do is you stop removing the deletion notice. Second, you need to explain why Wikipedia needs a template "for personal use." You also need to stop participating in this discussion with multiple accounts, declared or otherwise. You're doing yourself absolutely no favors. Mackensen (talk) 15:43, 22 September 2013 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was merge  Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 22:19, 28 September 2013 (UTC) reply

Template:Infobox animated superhero ( talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

It seems to be a fork of Template:Infobox comics character and could be merged back with it. 11 transclusions. eh bien mon prince ( talk) 05:44, 18 September 2013 (UTC) reply

• Replace per nom -- 70.24.249.39 ( talk) 06:09, 18 September 2013 (UTC) reply
• merge as suggested. Frietjes ( talk) 18:04, 18 September 2013 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was merge  Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 22:19, 28 September 2013 (UTC) reply

Template:Infobox StarWarsSpecies ( talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Could be replaced by Template:Infobox fictional race. Three transclusions. eh bien mon prince ( talk) 05:38, 18 September 2013 (UTC) reply

• Replace per nom -- 70.24.249.39 ( talk) 06:09, 18 September 2013 (UTC) reply
• Agreed, with sidenote that Template:Infobox fictional race needs some out-of-universe-ness tweaks/support. -- EEMIV ( talk) 16:00, 18 September 2013 (UTC) reply
• merge as suggested. Frietjes ( talk) 18:05, 18 September 2013 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was move to portal space.  Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 21:53, 28 September 2013 (UTC) reply

Template:Ottoman Empire periods infobox ( talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

I propose the deletion, without replacement, of this infobox. It appears on four pages, and on all four nothing is lost or gained by the presence of a few basic information about the periodisation of Ottoman history. eh bien mon prince ( talk) 05:25, 18 September 2013 (UTC) reply

• move to a subpage of Portal:Military history of the Ottoman Empire for the portal-space uses, and delete the rest. the linked timeline is very difficult to read, and would be better replaced by a link to Rise of the Ottoman Empire. Frietjes ( talk) 18:07, 18 September 2013 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete  Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 21:51, 28 September 2013 (UTC) reply

Template:Infobox Bilateral relations small ( talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused fork of Template:Infobox bilateral relations. eh bien mon prince ( talk) 04:27, 18 September 2013 (UTC) reply

• delete, if this functionality is needed, we can easily add it to the main template. no need to fork it. Frietjes ( talk) 18:08, 18 September 2013 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.