- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was relisting on Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2013 July 3 . Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 02:17, 3 July 2013 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 02:04, 1 July 2013 (UTC)
- Template:Miss Teen Canada ( talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Apart from one blue link, this template consists solely of redlinks. I also do not believe that the creation of year-specific articles about Miss Teen Canada would be justified. This template should be deleted. Neelix ( talk) 02:29, 24 June 2013 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. This template was created in 2010 by an editor who hasn't edited since August of that year. Additionally, this editor created a few other templates that we may want to consider deleting as well such as Template:MissBalticSea. Kumioko ( talk) 20:04, 26 June 2013 (UTC)
- delete, not enough blue links for a navbox. Frietjes ( talk) 15:44, 27 June 2013 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was relisting on Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2013 July 3 . Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 02:17, 3 July 2013 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 02:04, 1 July 2013 (UTC)
- Template:Miss Teen Canada ( talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Apart from one blue link, this template consists solely of redlinks. I also do not believe that the creation of year-specific articles about Miss Teen Canada would be justified. This template should be deleted. Neelix ( talk) 02:29, 24 June 2013 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. This template was created in 2010 by an editor who hasn't edited since August of that year. Additionally, this editor created a few other templates that we may want to consider deleting as well such as Template:MissBalticSea. Kumioko ( talk) 20:04, 26 June 2013 (UTC)
- delete, not enough blue links for a navbox. Frietjes ( talk) 15:44, 27 June 2013 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.