- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. ( non-admin closure). 187.126.142.32 ( talk) 09:33, 4 August 2012 (UTC)
- Template:Myspace ( talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Nobody uses Myspace anymore. Intelligent Deathclaw ( talk) 23:44, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
- Speedy keep This has to be a joke. — Torchiest talk edits 02:57, 4 August 2012 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 05:01, 13 August 2012 (UTC)
- Template:Google bug ( talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
The bug has been fixed. 187.126.142.32 ( talk) 17:02, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
- Delete. Good point; I created this in response to a technical problem with some browsers six years ago; it must be thoroughly obsolete now.
Fut.Perf.
☼
18:04, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
- Comment I think we should assume obsolescence on the 10th anniversary of being fixed. -- 76.65.131.160 ( talk) 05:36, 4 August 2012 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 05:02, 13 August 2012 (UTC)
Unsourced and fairly arbitrary selection of the best-selling games. The totals don't always match the information in the individual games' articles, among other problems. Per a discussion here, WP:VG editors agreed it should be deleted. — Torchiest talk edits 16:51, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
- Delete. Not needed. - Koppapa ( talk) 08:00, 4 August 2012 (UTC)
- Delete. Unneeded and without adequate info. -- ProtoDrake ( talk) 16:02, 5 August 2012 (UTC)
- Delete. We already have an article that adequately covers the topic, having a navbox is excessive and encourages template creep.-- SGCM (talk) 15:51, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
- Delete. Not needed. TBran dl ey 17:26, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
- Delete. Unnecessary and lacks any sources. EternalMeister TALK 23:57, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
- Delete. Not needed, it's an unanimous vote and snow close. ApprenticeFan work 14:01, 10 August 2012 (UTC)
- Keep. I liek it 75.21.149.184 ( talk) 13:40, 11 August 2012 (UTC)
- Delete. It just seems to fall under WP:NOTNEWS to me...I could be crazy though. Either way I don't think it's needed. Jguy Talk Done 01:11, 12 August 2012 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was merge Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:27, 15 August 2012 (UTC)
- Template:FC Baku squad ( talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- Template:FK Baku squad ( talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Propose merging
Template:FC Baku squad with
Template:FK Baku squad.
The older
Template:FK Baku squad should be renamed to
Template:FC Baku squad to be consistent with the article name
FC Baku and retain the editing history.
Template:FK Baku squad should then redirect to
Template:FC Baku squad.
Kq-hit (
talk)
10:27, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 04:49, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
- Template:Kobilje ( talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
This " navigation template" contains just one blue link. Redundant for now. Eleassar my talk 10:04, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 05:06, 13 August 2012 (UTC)
The template is not used and no longer works correctly. Wikien2009 ( talk) 01:06, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. ( non-admin closure). 187.126.142.32 ( talk) 09:33, 4 August 2012 (UTC)
- Template:Myspace ( talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Nobody uses Myspace anymore. Intelligent Deathclaw ( talk) 23:44, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
- Speedy keep This has to be a joke. — Torchiest talk edits 02:57, 4 August 2012 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 05:01, 13 August 2012 (UTC)
- Template:Google bug ( talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
The bug has been fixed. 187.126.142.32 ( talk) 17:02, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
- Delete. Good point; I created this in response to a technical problem with some browsers six years ago; it must be thoroughly obsolete now.
Fut.Perf.
☼
18:04, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
- Comment I think we should assume obsolescence on the 10th anniversary of being fixed. -- 76.65.131.160 ( talk) 05:36, 4 August 2012 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 05:02, 13 August 2012 (UTC)
Unsourced and fairly arbitrary selection of the best-selling games. The totals don't always match the information in the individual games' articles, among other problems. Per a discussion here, WP:VG editors agreed it should be deleted. — Torchiest talk edits 16:51, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
- Delete. Not needed. - Koppapa ( talk) 08:00, 4 August 2012 (UTC)
- Delete. Unneeded and without adequate info. -- ProtoDrake ( talk) 16:02, 5 August 2012 (UTC)
- Delete. We already have an article that adequately covers the topic, having a navbox is excessive and encourages template creep.-- SGCM (talk) 15:51, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
- Delete. Not needed. TBran dl ey 17:26, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
- Delete. Unnecessary and lacks any sources. EternalMeister TALK 23:57, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
- Delete. Not needed, it's an unanimous vote and snow close. ApprenticeFan work 14:01, 10 August 2012 (UTC)
- Keep. I liek it 75.21.149.184 ( talk) 13:40, 11 August 2012 (UTC)
- Delete. It just seems to fall under WP:NOTNEWS to me...I could be crazy though. Either way I don't think it's needed. Jguy Talk Done 01:11, 12 August 2012 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was merge Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:27, 15 August 2012 (UTC)
- Template:FC Baku squad ( talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- Template:FK Baku squad ( talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Propose merging
Template:FC Baku squad with
Template:FK Baku squad.
The older
Template:FK Baku squad should be renamed to
Template:FC Baku squad to be consistent with the article name
FC Baku and retain the editing history.
Template:FK Baku squad should then redirect to
Template:FC Baku squad.
Kq-hit (
talk)
10:27, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 04:49, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
- Template:Kobilje ( talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
This " navigation template" contains just one blue link. Redundant for now. Eleassar my talk 10:04, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 05:06, 13 August 2012 (UTC)
The template is not used and no longer works correctly. Wikien2009 ( talk) 01:06, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.