The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 17:58, 6 March 2011 (UTC)
Apparently, my nomination of this page for G8 was "ridiculous". Fair enough; maybe G6 would have been better. Still, this template is useless (two redlinks only, and no main article on the topic), and currently unused. — This, that, and the other (talk) 23:59, 25 February 2011 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Snow Keep and Request Withdrawn. It appears that consensus is favor of enforcing WP:ELNO rather than deleting the the template altogether. Alpha Quadrant talk 19:29, 27 February 2011 (UTC)
Facebook links are neither reliable sources, nor do they hold any encyclopedic value. Also per WP:NOT, Wikipedia is not a facebook directory. Alpha Quadrant talk 22:17, 25 February 2011 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 17:59, 6 March 2011 (UTC)
Useless template with no article using it. Also, it duplicates the function of the {{ Television in the Philippines}} template. - WayKurat ( talk) 12:35, 25 February 2011 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 18:07, 6 March 2011 (UTC)
All links redirect to same page. Useless. Unused. — This, that, and the other (talk) 07:14, 25 February 2011 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was speedy delete as G7. NAC. — Train2104 ( talk • contribs • count) 17:34, 25 February 2011 (UTC)
Not used. Purpose unclear, but it seems a bit excessive. — This, that, and the other (talk) 07:14, 25 February 2011 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was no consensus Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 18:08, 6 March 2011 (UTC)
These templates don't have many transclusions, and are better off redirecting to Template:R from member which covers their purposes. :| TelCo NaSp Ve :| 03:45, 25 February 2011 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Speedy delete as dependent on a deleted project Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 07:47, 25 February 2011 (UTC)
The project has been deleted. There seems to reason to keep this around. Guerillero | My Talk 03:43, 25 February 2011 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 18:13, 6 March 2011 (UTC)
Redundant to {{ PD-art| PD-old-70}} Magog the Ogre ( talk) 20:17, 9 February 2011 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 18:13, 6 March 2011 (UTC)
Unused template; generally this type of image should be housed on commons anyway; somewhat redundant to {{ PD-art| PD-Australia}} Magog the Ogre ( talk) 20:13, 9 February 2011 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was no consensus Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 18:13, 6 March 2011 (UTC)
Redundant to {{ PD-art| PD-old-70}} Magog the Ogre ( talk) 20:08, 9 February 2011 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was no consensus Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 18:12, 6 March 2011 (UTC)
Redundant to {{ PD-art| PD-US}}, {{ PD-art| PD-USonly}} or a similar variant (e.g., US-1923-abroad, US-URAA) Magog the Ogre ( talk) 20:07, 9 February 2011 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was no consensus Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 18:12, 6 March 2011 (UTC)
Redundant to {{ PD-art| PD-URAA}} Magog the Ogre ( talk) 20:01, 9 February 2011 (UTC)
^ keep this one. It's a lot easier to find this in the pd-templates category than to try to find that combination of two templates proposed by the nom. If the argument is just simplicity (as opposed to this template violating some other copyright policy) then I think having this template is simpler than not. -- Selket Talk 07:45, 4 March 2011 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was no consensus to delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 18:20, 6 March 2011 (UTC)
With all due respect to template creator, I foresee no valuable usage whatsoever for this template, with the possible exception of the main page, which is already taken up by {{ Main Page interwikis}} Magog the Ogre ( talk) 04:54, 17 February 2011 (UTC)
OK - but how many users have their SUL activated on every project and have blue links for their userpages there? Magog the Ogre ( talk) 12:59, 17 February 2011 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 17:58, 6 March 2011 (UTC)
Apparently, my nomination of this page for G8 was "ridiculous". Fair enough; maybe G6 would have been better. Still, this template is useless (two redlinks only, and no main article on the topic), and currently unused. — This, that, and the other (talk) 23:59, 25 February 2011 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Snow Keep and Request Withdrawn. It appears that consensus is favor of enforcing WP:ELNO rather than deleting the the template altogether. Alpha Quadrant talk 19:29, 27 February 2011 (UTC)
Facebook links are neither reliable sources, nor do they hold any encyclopedic value. Also per WP:NOT, Wikipedia is not a facebook directory. Alpha Quadrant talk 22:17, 25 February 2011 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 17:59, 6 March 2011 (UTC)
Useless template with no article using it. Also, it duplicates the function of the {{ Television in the Philippines}} template. - WayKurat ( talk) 12:35, 25 February 2011 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 18:07, 6 March 2011 (UTC)
All links redirect to same page. Useless. Unused. — This, that, and the other (talk) 07:14, 25 February 2011 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was speedy delete as G7. NAC. — Train2104 ( talk • contribs • count) 17:34, 25 February 2011 (UTC)
Not used. Purpose unclear, but it seems a bit excessive. — This, that, and the other (talk) 07:14, 25 February 2011 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was no consensus Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 18:08, 6 March 2011 (UTC)
These templates don't have many transclusions, and are better off redirecting to Template:R from member which covers their purposes. :| TelCo NaSp Ve :| 03:45, 25 February 2011 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Speedy delete as dependent on a deleted project Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 07:47, 25 February 2011 (UTC)
The project has been deleted. There seems to reason to keep this around. Guerillero | My Talk 03:43, 25 February 2011 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 18:13, 6 March 2011 (UTC)
Redundant to {{ PD-art| PD-old-70}} Magog the Ogre ( talk) 20:17, 9 February 2011 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 18:13, 6 March 2011 (UTC)
Unused template; generally this type of image should be housed on commons anyway; somewhat redundant to {{ PD-art| PD-Australia}} Magog the Ogre ( talk) 20:13, 9 February 2011 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was no consensus Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 18:13, 6 March 2011 (UTC)
Redundant to {{ PD-art| PD-old-70}} Magog the Ogre ( talk) 20:08, 9 February 2011 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was no consensus Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 18:12, 6 March 2011 (UTC)
Redundant to {{ PD-art| PD-US}}, {{ PD-art| PD-USonly}} or a similar variant (e.g., US-1923-abroad, US-URAA) Magog the Ogre ( talk) 20:07, 9 February 2011 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was no consensus Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 18:12, 6 March 2011 (UTC)
Redundant to {{ PD-art| PD-URAA}} Magog the Ogre ( talk) 20:01, 9 February 2011 (UTC)
^ keep this one. It's a lot easier to find this in the pd-templates category than to try to find that combination of two templates proposed by the nom. If the argument is just simplicity (as opposed to this template violating some other copyright policy) then I think having this template is simpler than not. -- Selket Talk 07:45, 4 March 2011 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was no consensus to delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 18:20, 6 March 2011 (UTC)
With all due respect to template creator, I foresee no valuable usage whatsoever for this template, with the possible exception of the main page, which is already taken up by {{ Main Page interwikis}} Magog the Ogre ( talk) 04:54, 17 February 2011 (UTC)
OK - but how many users have their SUL activated on every project and have blue links for their userpages there? Magog the Ogre ( talk) 12:59, 17 February 2011 (UTC)