The result of the discussion was Withdrawn. Per Resolute below, and the fact that as people will edit these templates and thus make them useful this big list is going to become unwieldy. Will split still-unused templates into more focused groups and relist. - Mobius Clock 09:33, 3 May 2010 (UTC)
All of the above templates are navboxes or navigational sidebars which contain either no active links at all, or so few as to render having a navbox pointless. These are all I could get from the report on unused templates, I'm sure there will be more when/if I can get access to the full list! Would someone with AWB access be able to go through and tag all the templates? It'd take me forever; thanks in advance. (Done with my own assisted-editing script. -
Mobius Clock 19:45, 2 May 2010 (UTC)) -
Mobius Clock
19:18, 1 May 2010 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:05, 8 May 2010 (UTC)
'Anjehism' doesn't seem to exist, most links point to pages other than those in the link text; no transclusions. - Mobius Clock 18:47, 1 May 2010 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:07, 8 May 2010 (UTC)
Blanked as being 'horrible', not edited since 2009. Simply an unlinked list before blanking. I looked for an applicable CSD, but couldn't find anything, please let me know if I missed one. - Mobius Clock 18:32, 1 May 2010 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. Tim Song ( talk) 06:00, 9 May 2010 (UTC)
Redundant to {{ Buffalo, New York}}; all the malls are already listed on that template or shouldn't be (i.e., non-notable strip malls). Only used on one article. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ( Many otters • One bat • One hammer) 17:16, 1 May 2010 (UTC)
{{
Buffalo, New York}}
template.
Airplaneman
✈
05:19, 9 May 2010 (UTC)The result of the discussion was Delete this is clearly a typo, it shouldn't have the quotes. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 16:15, 1 May 2010 (UTC)
A template with a name longer than the text it creates? Pretty much the definition of pointless. Apparently supposed to be a colour template for election results or suchlike, but another template already exists for this party (seemingly with useful content), so definitely no need for this. No transclusions or links. - Mobius Clock 15:49, 1 May 2010 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. Tim Song ( talk) 06:03, 9 May 2010 (UTC)
Orphaned template, last modified on 8 August 2006 at 04:47. —Preceding unsigned comment added by EmanWilm ( talk • contribs) 04:02, 1 May 2010
The result of the discussion was delete all. Tim Song ( talk) 06:04, 9 May 2010 (UTC)
Orphaned templates, linking only to each other, and several templates w/ red-links pages: red links/056 red links/060, red links/2006jan25-1, red links/2006jan25-2 & red links/2006jan25-3 EmanWilm ( talk) 03:55, 1 May 2010 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was nomination withdrawn Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 13:43, 3 May 2010 (UTC)
These seem an effort to dodge the view that imdb is not a reliable source. Absent a consensus for these to exist, they would be best deleted.
Jack Merridew
03:43, 1 May 2010 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Delete. RL0919 ( talk) 14:56, 8 May 2010 (UTC)
Orphaned template Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 03:37, 1 May 2010 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Delete. RL0919 ( talk) 14:53, 8 May 2010 (UTC)
Massive orphaned navigation box Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 03:34, 1 May 2010 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Delete. Unused and no objection to deletion. RL0919 ( talk) 14:50, 8 May 2010 (UTC)
Orphaned templates Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 03:29, 1 May 2010 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Delete. Unused and no objection to deletion. RL0919 ( talk) 14:33, 8 May 2010 (UTC)
Orphaned template. I believe this type of navigation box is deprecated. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:24, 1 May 2010 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Delete. Unused and no objection to deletion. RL0919 ( talk) 14:28, 8 May 2010 (UTC)
Orphaned template, not sure if the information should be merged somewhere. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:22, 1 May 2010 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Delete per author approval. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 18:05, 1 May 2010 (UTC)
Orphaned templates, not sure of their exact purpose. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:17, 1 May 2010 (UTC)
Name | Size | |
---|---|---|
1 | Mary | 9.05 |
2 | Joe | 2.4 |
3 | Mark | 5.06 |
Total kB: | 16.512 |
The result of the discussion was Keep now that it is in use. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 05:17, 1 May 2010 (UTC)
Orphaned template. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:14, 1 May 2010 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Delete. Unused and no objection to deletion. RL0919 ( talk) 14:24, 8 May 2010 (UTC)
Orphaned template, which appears to have been replaced by something else. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:07, 1 May 2010 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Withdrawn. Per Resolute below, and the fact that as people will edit these templates and thus make them useful this big list is going to become unwieldy. Will split still-unused templates into more focused groups and relist. - Mobius Clock 09:33, 3 May 2010 (UTC)
All of the above templates are navboxes or navigational sidebars which contain either no active links at all, or so few as to render having a navbox pointless. These are all I could get from the report on unused templates, I'm sure there will be more when/if I can get access to the full list! Would someone with AWB access be able to go through and tag all the templates? It'd take me forever; thanks in advance. (Done with my own assisted-editing script. -
Mobius Clock 19:45, 2 May 2010 (UTC)) -
Mobius Clock
19:18, 1 May 2010 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:05, 8 May 2010 (UTC)
'Anjehism' doesn't seem to exist, most links point to pages other than those in the link text; no transclusions. - Mobius Clock 18:47, 1 May 2010 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:07, 8 May 2010 (UTC)
Blanked as being 'horrible', not edited since 2009. Simply an unlinked list before blanking. I looked for an applicable CSD, but couldn't find anything, please let me know if I missed one. - Mobius Clock 18:32, 1 May 2010 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. Tim Song ( talk) 06:00, 9 May 2010 (UTC)
Redundant to {{ Buffalo, New York}}; all the malls are already listed on that template or shouldn't be (i.e., non-notable strip malls). Only used on one article. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ( Many otters • One bat • One hammer) 17:16, 1 May 2010 (UTC)
{{
Buffalo, New York}}
template.
Airplaneman
✈
05:19, 9 May 2010 (UTC)The result of the discussion was Delete this is clearly a typo, it shouldn't have the quotes. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 16:15, 1 May 2010 (UTC)
A template with a name longer than the text it creates? Pretty much the definition of pointless. Apparently supposed to be a colour template for election results or suchlike, but another template already exists for this party (seemingly with useful content), so definitely no need for this. No transclusions or links. - Mobius Clock 15:49, 1 May 2010 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. Tim Song ( talk) 06:03, 9 May 2010 (UTC)
Orphaned template, last modified on 8 August 2006 at 04:47. —Preceding unsigned comment added by EmanWilm ( talk • contribs) 04:02, 1 May 2010
The result of the discussion was delete all. Tim Song ( talk) 06:04, 9 May 2010 (UTC)
Orphaned templates, linking only to each other, and several templates w/ red-links pages: red links/056 red links/060, red links/2006jan25-1, red links/2006jan25-2 & red links/2006jan25-3 EmanWilm ( talk) 03:55, 1 May 2010 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was nomination withdrawn Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 13:43, 3 May 2010 (UTC)
These seem an effort to dodge the view that imdb is not a reliable source. Absent a consensus for these to exist, they would be best deleted.
Jack Merridew
03:43, 1 May 2010 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Delete. RL0919 ( talk) 14:56, 8 May 2010 (UTC)
Orphaned template Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 03:37, 1 May 2010 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Delete. RL0919 ( talk) 14:53, 8 May 2010 (UTC)
Massive orphaned navigation box Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 03:34, 1 May 2010 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Delete. Unused and no objection to deletion. RL0919 ( talk) 14:50, 8 May 2010 (UTC)
Orphaned templates Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 03:29, 1 May 2010 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Delete. Unused and no objection to deletion. RL0919 ( talk) 14:33, 8 May 2010 (UTC)
Orphaned template. I believe this type of navigation box is deprecated. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:24, 1 May 2010 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Delete. Unused and no objection to deletion. RL0919 ( talk) 14:28, 8 May 2010 (UTC)
Orphaned template, not sure if the information should be merged somewhere. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:22, 1 May 2010 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Delete per author approval. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 18:05, 1 May 2010 (UTC)
Orphaned templates, not sure of their exact purpose. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:17, 1 May 2010 (UTC)
Name | Size | |
---|---|---|
1 | Mary | 9.05 |
2 | Joe | 2.4 |
3 | Mark | 5.06 |
Total kB: | 16.512 |
The result of the discussion was Keep now that it is in use. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 05:17, 1 May 2010 (UTC)
Orphaned template. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:14, 1 May 2010 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Delete. Unused and no objection to deletion. RL0919 ( talk) 14:24, 8 May 2010 (UTC)
Orphaned template, which appears to have been replaced by something else. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:07, 1 May 2010 (UTC)