< February 28 | March 2 > |
---|
The result of the discussion was Delete all. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 10:39, 9 March 2010 (UTC)
Unused and redundant to {{ Weekday in month}}. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 21:47, 1 March 2010 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Delete as redundant to existing templates and other methods for dealing with both vandalism and non-vandalism article problems. RL0919 ( talk) 14:43, 8 March 2010 (UTC)
Unnecessary and unused template. Articles which are vandalism should be speedy deleted (hoax, vandalism, attack page, ...) if all reversions are vandalism, or reverted to a pre-vandalized state. If you are unsure whether it is vandalism or not, you can still revert if older revisions exist, or discuss it on the talk page. There is a multitude of tags for specific problems, whether it is a supposed hoax or a supposed copyvio. No new template is needed here. If kept, the template should be thoroughly improved, both the text of it and the categories it lists articles in. Fram ( talk) 14:19, 1 March 2010 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Keep. RL0919 ( talk) 14:36, 8 March 2010 (UTC)
Pretty arbitrary listing; I can't imagine that this is really used to navigate these four largely unrelated articles. It also appears at random intervals in articles (e.g. discussion expansion in the NHL) rather than a comparative study of the leagues (which would probably be outside the scope of the four articles anyway.) Also, by necessity, it will never navigate more than four or possibly five articles if there is a surge in interest in the MLS. — Justin (koavf)❤ T☮ C☺ M☯ 08:47, 1 March 2010 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Keep. Note that a "keep" result for the template does not preclude editorial changes to its wording or removing it from categories where it is not helpful; those are left to the discretion of editors working on those pages. RL0919 ( talk) 01:05, 10 March 2010 (UTC)
Delete. Clunky, redundant and links to WP namespace given in content categories. -- Alan Liefting ( talk) - 05:15, 1 March 2010 (UTC)
Oppose: Clunkiness can be fixed. How is it redundant? - TheMightyQuill ( talk) 16:49, 1 March 2010 (UTC)
Comment - a very large number of categories have been just tagged with a template that objects to the use of the word terrorist - this is a category that uses the word terrorism in a wider context rather than naming a specific person a terrorist - I really wonder the efficacy of tagging every category in wikipedia with the word terrorism in it? Satu Suro 01:13, 3 March 2010 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was The result of the discussion was Delete no need for a copy that is created by a sockpuppet. something lame from CBW 02:01, 7 March 2010 (UTC) I brought this to MfD as I have no idea where else to bring it. Despite the name, it is not a template, but simply a copy of Croydon Athletic F.C. copied and pasted to a new, rather bizarre, title. Even if fixed to be what the title suggests it should be, it should be deleted, as there's no way a non-professional football club's youth team needs a template -- ChrisTheDude ( talk) 15:50, 1 March 2010 (UTC)
< February 28 | March 2 > |
---|
The result of the discussion was Delete all. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 10:39, 9 March 2010 (UTC)
Unused and redundant to {{ Weekday in month}}. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 21:47, 1 March 2010 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Delete as redundant to existing templates and other methods for dealing with both vandalism and non-vandalism article problems. RL0919 ( talk) 14:43, 8 March 2010 (UTC)
Unnecessary and unused template. Articles which are vandalism should be speedy deleted (hoax, vandalism, attack page, ...) if all reversions are vandalism, or reverted to a pre-vandalized state. If you are unsure whether it is vandalism or not, you can still revert if older revisions exist, or discuss it on the talk page. There is a multitude of tags for specific problems, whether it is a supposed hoax or a supposed copyvio. No new template is needed here. If kept, the template should be thoroughly improved, both the text of it and the categories it lists articles in. Fram ( talk) 14:19, 1 March 2010 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Keep. RL0919 ( talk) 14:36, 8 March 2010 (UTC)
Pretty arbitrary listing; I can't imagine that this is really used to navigate these four largely unrelated articles. It also appears at random intervals in articles (e.g. discussion expansion in the NHL) rather than a comparative study of the leagues (which would probably be outside the scope of the four articles anyway.) Also, by necessity, it will never navigate more than four or possibly five articles if there is a surge in interest in the MLS. — Justin (koavf)❤ T☮ C☺ M☯ 08:47, 1 March 2010 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Keep. Note that a "keep" result for the template does not preclude editorial changes to its wording or removing it from categories where it is not helpful; those are left to the discretion of editors working on those pages. RL0919 ( talk) 01:05, 10 March 2010 (UTC)
Delete. Clunky, redundant and links to WP namespace given in content categories. -- Alan Liefting ( talk) - 05:15, 1 March 2010 (UTC)
Oppose: Clunkiness can be fixed. How is it redundant? - TheMightyQuill ( talk) 16:49, 1 March 2010 (UTC)
Comment - a very large number of categories have been just tagged with a template that objects to the use of the word terrorist - this is a category that uses the word terrorism in a wider context rather than naming a specific person a terrorist - I really wonder the efficacy of tagging every category in wikipedia with the word terrorism in it? Satu Suro 01:13, 3 March 2010 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was The result of the discussion was Delete no need for a copy that is created by a sockpuppet. something lame from CBW 02:01, 7 March 2010 (UTC) I brought this to MfD as I have no idea where else to bring it. Despite the name, it is not a template, but simply a copy of Croydon Athletic F.C. copied and pasted to a new, rather bizarre, title. Even if fixed to be what the title suggests it should be, it should be deleted, as there's no way a non-professional football club's youth team needs a template -- ChrisTheDude ( talk) 15:50, 1 March 2010 (UTC)