< December 31 | January 2 > |
---|
The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:36, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
Unused template. The associated Category:Pages with an EasyTimeline map (populated by this template) has been nominated for deletion at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2010 January 1#Category:Pages_with_an_EasyTimeline_map. -- BrownHairedGirl (talk) • ( contribs) 21:05, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was No consensus to merge. No one stated a specific support or oppose, but there seem to be more reservations than enthusiasm. RL0919 ( talk) 19:25, 10 January 2010 (UTC)
Propose merging
Template:Tianjin with
Template:Landmarks in Tianjin.
I found this nomination incomplete. At
Template_talk:Tianjin it said "Like the Beijing, Shanghai, and chongqing Templates, We should merge Tianjin Template with Template:Landmarks in Tianjin".
Debresser (
talk)
21:01, 24 December 2009 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was merge Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:37, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
Propose merging
Template:Arthur C. Clarke with
Template:Footer The Novels of Arthur C. Clarke.
The footer is completely included in the general Clarke template, which is related enough to replace it. The only thing the general template deoesn't indicate is the authors with which some works were written as a collaboration, which I think is anyway out of place in a template.
Debresser (
talk)
20:44, 24 December 2009 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:48, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
The work of an ardent fan, promoting his favourite actor. Unencyclopedic and irrelevent as the actor is not too famous and has not done anything of worth value Universal Hero ( talk) 19:10, 24 December 2009 (UTC)
I think it is not a good reason to delete this template. I think it helps the user to switch to every Silambarasan movies, in my opinion it is good that you can switch to every of his movies. He is one of the famous actors in Kollywood. He is acting since he was born and recently he got a worldwide audio release function of his starring movie. In conclusion it is worth to use this template. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Purushoth1992 ( talk • contribs) 21:46, 24 December 2009 (UTC)
Even though it is helpful to use this. I would prefer you to make a template for rajini and kamal and etc., then every prominent kollywoodstar has a template like Simbu. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 188.109.151.32 ( talk) 20:23, 25 December 2009 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. Jafeluv ( talk) 12:47, 13 January 2010 (UTC)
This seems to meet Reason 2 for deleting templates: The template is redundant to a better-designed template, specifically Template:Baptist. The template is also rather intrusive. Novaseminary ( talk) 06:48, 18 December 2009 (UTC)
<noinclude>...</noinclude>
around the Tfd notice if it is likely to be disruptive to articles that transclude that template."), so I mentioned it on the
Baptist talk page instead figuring editors watching that page would be interested. That said, it looks fine to me and I doubt it is causing problems on too many pages. Maybe editors will chime in now.
Novaseminary (
talk)
21:28, 7 January 2010 (UTC)The result of the discussion was delete. Wizardman Operation Big Bear 17:19, 15 January 2010 (UTC)
WP:NOTADVERTISING. As far as I can see, this template serves no purpose other than promoting the software. See discussion of related categories at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2009 December 31#Category:Created_with_Illustrator BrownHairedGirl (talk) • ( contribs) 19:19, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Speedy deleted Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 18:47, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
Apparently unused template of unclear purpose. Is it for templates which lack fields, or for articles whose infoboxes are incomplete? The only thing this template does is to categorise the article in Category:Infoboxes in need of more info, which if kept should be a hidden category since it's a maintenance category. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • ( contribs) 18:13, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Delete. RL0919 ( talk) 20:21, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
Unused template. A parameter on {{ U.S. Roads WikiProject}} handles the needs of this template, making it redundant also. --- Dough 48 72 15:59, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:32, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
No explanation as to what it is for, and it's unused/orphaned. Erzsébet Báthory( talk| contr.) 14:36, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
< December 31 | January 2 > |
---|
The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:36, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
Unused template. The associated Category:Pages with an EasyTimeline map (populated by this template) has been nominated for deletion at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2010 January 1#Category:Pages_with_an_EasyTimeline_map. -- BrownHairedGirl (talk) • ( contribs) 21:05, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was No consensus to merge. No one stated a specific support or oppose, but there seem to be more reservations than enthusiasm. RL0919 ( talk) 19:25, 10 January 2010 (UTC)
Propose merging
Template:Tianjin with
Template:Landmarks in Tianjin.
I found this nomination incomplete. At
Template_talk:Tianjin it said "Like the Beijing, Shanghai, and chongqing Templates, We should merge Tianjin Template with Template:Landmarks in Tianjin".
Debresser (
talk)
21:01, 24 December 2009 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was merge Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:37, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
Propose merging
Template:Arthur C. Clarke with
Template:Footer The Novels of Arthur C. Clarke.
The footer is completely included in the general Clarke template, which is related enough to replace it. The only thing the general template deoesn't indicate is the authors with which some works were written as a collaboration, which I think is anyway out of place in a template.
Debresser (
talk)
20:44, 24 December 2009 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:48, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
The work of an ardent fan, promoting his favourite actor. Unencyclopedic and irrelevent as the actor is not too famous and has not done anything of worth value Universal Hero ( talk) 19:10, 24 December 2009 (UTC)
I think it is not a good reason to delete this template. I think it helps the user to switch to every Silambarasan movies, in my opinion it is good that you can switch to every of his movies. He is one of the famous actors in Kollywood. He is acting since he was born and recently he got a worldwide audio release function of his starring movie. In conclusion it is worth to use this template. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Purushoth1992 ( talk • contribs) 21:46, 24 December 2009 (UTC)
Even though it is helpful to use this. I would prefer you to make a template for rajini and kamal and etc., then every prominent kollywoodstar has a template like Simbu. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 188.109.151.32 ( talk) 20:23, 25 December 2009 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. Jafeluv ( talk) 12:47, 13 January 2010 (UTC)
This seems to meet Reason 2 for deleting templates: The template is redundant to a better-designed template, specifically Template:Baptist. The template is also rather intrusive. Novaseminary ( talk) 06:48, 18 December 2009 (UTC)
<noinclude>...</noinclude>
around the Tfd notice if it is likely to be disruptive to articles that transclude that template."), so I mentioned it on the
Baptist talk page instead figuring editors watching that page would be interested. That said, it looks fine to me and I doubt it is causing problems on too many pages. Maybe editors will chime in now.
Novaseminary (
talk)
21:28, 7 January 2010 (UTC)The result of the discussion was delete. Wizardman Operation Big Bear 17:19, 15 January 2010 (UTC)
WP:NOTADVERTISING. As far as I can see, this template serves no purpose other than promoting the software. See discussion of related categories at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2009 December 31#Category:Created_with_Illustrator BrownHairedGirl (talk) • ( contribs) 19:19, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Speedy deleted Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 18:47, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
Apparently unused template of unclear purpose. Is it for templates which lack fields, or for articles whose infoboxes are incomplete? The only thing this template does is to categorise the article in Category:Infoboxes in need of more info, which if kept should be a hidden category since it's a maintenance category. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • ( contribs) 18:13, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Delete. RL0919 ( talk) 20:21, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
Unused template. A parameter on {{ U.S. Roads WikiProject}} handles the needs of this template, making it redundant also. --- Dough 48 72 15:59, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:32, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
No explanation as to what it is for, and it's unused/orphaned. Erzsébet Báthory( talk| contr.) 14:36, 1 January 2010 (UTC)