The result of the discussion was speedy deleted under G5 (non-admin closure)— Train2104 ( talk · contribs · count · email) 14:16, 15 August 2010 (UTC)
All of these stations are semi-satellites of Albuquerque's KOB-TV. This template is therefore redundant. Blueboy 96 23:56, 14 August 2010 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. JPG-GR ( talk) 06:52, 22 August 2010 (UTC)
Redundant to {{ Infobox settlement}}. Andy Mabbett (User:Pigsonthewing); Andy's talk; Andy's edits 19:34, 14 August 2010 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. JPG-GR ( talk) 20:57, 20 August 2010 (UTC)
This template only has one link. A18919 ( talk) 19:25, 14 August 2010 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. JPG-GR ( talk) 20:53, 20 August 2010 (UTC)
All are redundant to {{ infobox road}} and the display output can be handled by that single template. Doing so will unite the appearance with the four types of highway articles. As well, some of the Indian highway articles can't use one of these templates because they don't support segmented routes, but infobox road does. The third benefit would be a consistent appearance with the majority of highway articles on Wikipedia. Imzadi 1979 → 08:45, 14 August 2010 (UTC)}}
The result of the discussion was delete. JPG-GR ( talk) 20:52, 20 August 2010 (UTC)
Why do we need this template while we can have {{Asia in topic|Wildlife of}}. Farjad0322 ( talk) 06:12, 14 August 2010 (UTC)
{{
Asia in topic|Wildlife of}}
brings out the following:The result of the discussion was withdrawn. JPG-GR ( talk) 04:34, 26 August 2010 (UTC)
Too wide to fit in an infobox, duplicative with the pseudo-route map in City Terminal Zone (the gray bars on the side). Also, this is really a collection of rail lines lumped together solely for customer identification by the railroad. Each line operations-wise has its own RDT. Train2104 ( talk) 02:45, 5 August 2010 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was speedy deleted under G5 (non-admin closure)— Train2104 ( talk · contribs · count · email) 14:16, 15 August 2010 (UTC)
All of these stations are semi-satellites of Albuquerque's KOB-TV. This template is therefore redundant. Blueboy 96 23:56, 14 August 2010 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. JPG-GR ( talk) 06:52, 22 August 2010 (UTC)
Redundant to {{ Infobox settlement}}. Andy Mabbett (User:Pigsonthewing); Andy's talk; Andy's edits 19:34, 14 August 2010 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. JPG-GR ( talk) 20:57, 20 August 2010 (UTC)
This template only has one link. A18919 ( talk) 19:25, 14 August 2010 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. JPG-GR ( talk) 20:53, 20 August 2010 (UTC)
All are redundant to {{ infobox road}} and the display output can be handled by that single template. Doing so will unite the appearance with the four types of highway articles. As well, some of the Indian highway articles can't use one of these templates because they don't support segmented routes, but infobox road does. The third benefit would be a consistent appearance with the majority of highway articles on Wikipedia. Imzadi 1979 → 08:45, 14 August 2010 (UTC)}}
The result of the discussion was delete. JPG-GR ( talk) 20:52, 20 August 2010 (UTC)
Why do we need this template while we can have {{Asia in topic|Wildlife of}}. Farjad0322 ( talk) 06:12, 14 August 2010 (UTC)
{{
Asia in topic|Wildlife of}}
brings out the following:The result of the discussion was withdrawn. JPG-GR ( talk) 04:34, 26 August 2010 (UTC)
Too wide to fit in an infobox, duplicative with the pseudo-route map in City Terminal Zone (the gray bars on the side). Also, this is really a collection of rail lines lumped together solely for customer identification by the railroad. Each line operations-wise has its own RDT. Train2104 ( talk) 02:45, 5 August 2010 (UTC)