< October 9 | October 11 > |
---|
The result of the discussion was keep. Garion96 (talk) 08:42, 18 October 2009 (UTC)
This template lists movies directed by Christopher Cain. This director is not particularly well known and is hardly an "Auteur" that readers need an aid to navigate to his other films. If a reader does want this information it is easy to find in the article on the director. Adding this template to a page would do nothing but add useless clutter and trivia. I know there is a substantial list of directors for which such templates exist (see Category:American film director templates), but a line has to drawn somewhere. We don't need a "By the same director" section in every movie article. RDBury ( talk) 10:10, 3 October 2009 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete Garion96 (talk) 08:44, 18 October 2009 (UTC)
Only used in two articles, appears to be redundant to {{
Infobox U.S. state}}. It appears to be a direct copy of {{Infobox U.S. state}}
with a field added for a "Coat of Arms", hence the name. I would say that field could be added to {{Infobox U.S. state}}
, and this box could be deleted. Interesting that the template was also created with the TFD already in it for some reason?
Plastikspork
―Œ(talk)
23:21, 10 October 2009 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was redirected to {{ Coord}}. Garion96 (talk) 09:15, 18 October 2009 (UTC)
This template has been deprecated and is currently not used on any pages. Ixfd64 ( talk) 18:40, 10 October 2009 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. Garion96 (talk) 09:18, 18 October 2009 (UTC)
This template has been deprecated and is currently not used on any pages. Ixfd64 ( talk) 18:27, 10 October 2009 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. Garion96 (talk) 09:21, 18 October 2009 (UTC)
The article the template refers to, G5 (British universities) is currently being considered for deletion due to notability issues. Given the questionable notability of the subject, it makes no sense to have a navigation template. The template is currently only used in the article mentioned. RDBury ( talk) 13:34, 10 October 2009 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. Garion96 (talk) 09:24, 18 October 2009 (UTC)
There seems to be little legitimate use for this navbox. Navboxes normally are used to tie together articles that have some strong relationship. I don't see how a listing of cities that have a university in the Big East sports conference really qualifies as a relevant connection. Brian Powell ( talk) 03:44, 10 October 2009 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was substitute and delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:47, 19 October 2009 (UTC)
As a popular template from several years ago, it has no modern use on Wikipedia. Furthermore, there is no reason to use it now, nor is there any reason for this text be a template at all. I propose that we subst its existing uses and then delete the template. @ harej 03:39, 10 October 2009 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. Garion96 (talk) 09:33, 18 October 2009 (UTC)
Consensus has determined that filmography templates for actors is redundant and unnecessary. See the section for the Jim Carrey template from October 9 for a breakdown of previous discussions that determined consensus. Wildhartlivie ( talk) 00:22, 10 October 2009 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. Garion96 (talk) 09:43, 18 October 2009 (UTC)
Making a word up, this is excessive over-templatization. We don't need yet another navbox for the Presidents that has only four names on it and will not be growing. It is just an unnecessary intersection of Template:US Presidents and Template:Nobel Peace Prize. Reywas92 Talk 00:13, 10 October 2009 (UTC)
< October 9 | October 11 > |
---|
The result of the discussion was keep. Garion96 (talk) 08:42, 18 October 2009 (UTC)
This template lists movies directed by Christopher Cain. This director is not particularly well known and is hardly an "Auteur" that readers need an aid to navigate to his other films. If a reader does want this information it is easy to find in the article on the director. Adding this template to a page would do nothing but add useless clutter and trivia. I know there is a substantial list of directors for which such templates exist (see Category:American film director templates), but a line has to drawn somewhere. We don't need a "By the same director" section in every movie article. RDBury ( talk) 10:10, 3 October 2009 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete Garion96 (talk) 08:44, 18 October 2009 (UTC)
Only used in two articles, appears to be redundant to {{
Infobox U.S. state}}. It appears to be a direct copy of {{Infobox U.S. state}}
with a field added for a "Coat of Arms", hence the name. I would say that field could be added to {{Infobox U.S. state}}
, and this box could be deleted. Interesting that the template was also created with the TFD already in it for some reason?
Plastikspork
―Œ(talk)
23:21, 10 October 2009 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was redirected to {{ Coord}}. Garion96 (talk) 09:15, 18 October 2009 (UTC)
This template has been deprecated and is currently not used on any pages. Ixfd64 ( talk) 18:40, 10 October 2009 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. Garion96 (talk) 09:18, 18 October 2009 (UTC)
This template has been deprecated and is currently not used on any pages. Ixfd64 ( talk) 18:27, 10 October 2009 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. Garion96 (talk) 09:21, 18 October 2009 (UTC)
The article the template refers to, G5 (British universities) is currently being considered for deletion due to notability issues. Given the questionable notability of the subject, it makes no sense to have a navigation template. The template is currently only used in the article mentioned. RDBury ( talk) 13:34, 10 October 2009 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. Garion96 (talk) 09:24, 18 October 2009 (UTC)
There seems to be little legitimate use for this navbox. Navboxes normally are used to tie together articles that have some strong relationship. I don't see how a listing of cities that have a university in the Big East sports conference really qualifies as a relevant connection. Brian Powell ( talk) 03:44, 10 October 2009 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was substitute and delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:47, 19 October 2009 (UTC)
As a popular template from several years ago, it has no modern use on Wikipedia. Furthermore, there is no reason to use it now, nor is there any reason for this text be a template at all. I propose that we subst its existing uses and then delete the template. @ harej 03:39, 10 October 2009 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. Garion96 (talk) 09:33, 18 October 2009 (UTC)
Consensus has determined that filmography templates for actors is redundant and unnecessary. See the section for the Jim Carrey template from October 9 for a breakdown of previous discussions that determined consensus. Wildhartlivie ( talk) 00:22, 10 October 2009 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. Garion96 (talk) 09:43, 18 October 2009 (UTC)
Making a word up, this is excessive over-templatization. We don't need yet another navbox for the Presidents that has only four names on it and will not be growing. It is just an unnecessary intersection of Template:US Presidents and Template:Nobel Peace Prize. Reywas92 Talk 00:13, 10 October 2009 (UTC)