The result of the discussion was delete Magioladitis ( talk) 23:07, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
Inappropriate "template" of nothing but external links; used only one two articles Patient safety and Patient safety organization, and seems be being used in a highly inappropriate fashion. -- Collectonian ( talk · contribs) 22:35, 27 July 2009 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was redirect JPG-GR ( talk) 04:57, 4 August 2009 (UTC)
This template is redundant based on the "athletics" section of Template:University of Michigan. Again, I suggest a merge and redirect. Muboshgu ( talk) 14:05, 27 July 2009 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was redirect. JPG-GR ( talk) 04:58, 4 August 2009 (UTC)
This template is redundant based on the existence of Template:Michigan Wolverines basketball. I suggest a merge and redirect. Muboshgu ( talk) 13:52, 27 July 2009 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was speedy delete per WP:CSD#G7 author request and unanimous opinion here. Amalthea 20:51, 27 July 2009 (UTC)
Horribly misguided template, going against some of our basic policies. "However, adding citation templates are considered disruptive edits and are disliked by the community."? Umm, no, citation tags are one of the basic cleanup tools: adding uncited text is the problem, not pointing out these problems. The template continues by pointing the templated reader to "disruptive editing". We don't need templates which go against our core policies. Fram ( talk) 09:46, 27 July 2009 (UTC)
*Comment Yes, I know that it is badly worded, but can anyone figure out a better wording? The creation comes out of people using the fact tag obnoxiously. I would appreciate any help with this.
Kevin Rutherford (
talk)
18:00, 27 July 2009 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was speedy delete as orphaned and per recent discussions on the plentiful 1632-related templates. JPG-GR ( talk) 04:50, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
Inappropriate template that was used to create full copies of works' TOC with links to sections; i.e. what a normal TOC does. This served to cement a whole lot of franchise spam into Wikipedia and present an impenetrable template syntax to wiki-editors. Now orphaned. Cheers, Jack Merridew 06:36, 27 July 2009 (UTC)
associated w/{{ 32TOC-beg}} and was used to create/colour part of the tables. now orphaned and highly inappropriate. Cheers, Jack Merridew 06:42, 27 July 2009 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete Magioladitis ( talk) 23:07, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
Inappropriate "template" of nothing but external links; used only one two articles Patient safety and Patient safety organization, and seems be being used in a highly inappropriate fashion. -- Collectonian ( talk · contribs) 22:35, 27 July 2009 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was redirect JPG-GR ( talk) 04:57, 4 August 2009 (UTC)
This template is redundant based on the "athletics" section of Template:University of Michigan. Again, I suggest a merge and redirect. Muboshgu ( talk) 14:05, 27 July 2009 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was redirect. JPG-GR ( talk) 04:58, 4 August 2009 (UTC)
This template is redundant based on the existence of Template:Michigan Wolverines basketball. I suggest a merge and redirect. Muboshgu ( talk) 13:52, 27 July 2009 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was speedy delete per WP:CSD#G7 author request and unanimous opinion here. Amalthea 20:51, 27 July 2009 (UTC)
Horribly misguided template, going against some of our basic policies. "However, adding citation templates are considered disruptive edits and are disliked by the community."? Umm, no, citation tags are one of the basic cleanup tools: adding uncited text is the problem, not pointing out these problems. The template continues by pointing the templated reader to "disruptive editing". We don't need templates which go against our core policies. Fram ( talk) 09:46, 27 July 2009 (UTC)
*Comment Yes, I know that it is badly worded, but can anyone figure out a better wording? The creation comes out of people using the fact tag obnoxiously. I would appreciate any help with this.
Kevin Rutherford (
talk)
18:00, 27 July 2009 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was speedy delete as orphaned and per recent discussions on the plentiful 1632-related templates. JPG-GR ( talk) 04:50, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
Inappropriate template that was used to create full copies of works' TOC with links to sections; i.e. what a normal TOC does. This served to cement a whole lot of franchise spam into Wikipedia and present an impenetrable template syntax to wiki-editors. Now orphaned. Cheers, Jack Merridew 06:36, 27 July 2009 (UTC)
associated w/{{ 32TOC-beg}} and was used to create/colour part of the tables. now orphaned and highly inappropriate. Cheers, Jack Merridew 06:42, 27 July 2009 (UTC)