The result of the discussion was delete. JPG-GR ( talk) 22:46, 25 July 2009 (UTC)
An extreme edge case. Not a single use in mainspace that can't be ascribed to either stylized branding or creative signwriting, which apparently we don't encourage. Even the example given at MARRS appears to have relegated the pipes to a presentational detail. 81.110.104.91 ( talk) 21:35, 18 July 2009 (UTC) Delete Doesn't seem to be of much use. Kayau Jane Eyre PRIDE AND PREJUDICE les miserables 13:01, 25 July 2009 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete Magioladitis ( talk) 16:45, 25 July 2009 (UTC)
Just as consensus is being reached that this Michelle Bentley-created template defies many of Wikipedia's standards, User:Michelle Bentley creates a new poorly designed (both in terms of visual layout and content) template that violates WP:NPOV and uses one highly contentious and thoroughly debunked source as the basis for its inclusion. GHcool ( talk) 17:31, 18 July 2009 (UTC)
But the people who wants to delete it, should not be allowed to. When we can have a category about american socialists, then of course we can have about neoconservatives - a group which have had a greater impact on America and thus the world, than American socialists have. I realise that there have been discussions about neoconservatives before, but never about American neoconservatives. I can also well understand why a Category called: "American conservatives" doesn't exist, cause they are covered by Category:Republicans (United States). By the way, Carol: Why do you want to 'delete' this wikitable, that shows which thinktanks these individuals are affiliated with. It is in the public interest to know. One could perhaps understand that you want it removed from the page in question (allthough I have difficulty in comprehending that it should cause you any trouble or cause you to loose sleep at night). But why do you want this wikitable removed alltogether?. Michelle Bentley ( talk) 13:40, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. JPG-GR ( talk) 22:46, 25 July 2009 (UTC)
An extreme edge case. Not a single use in mainspace that can't be ascribed to either stylized branding or creative signwriting, which apparently we don't encourage. Even the example given at MARRS appears to have relegated the pipes to a presentational detail. 81.110.104.91 ( talk) 21:35, 18 July 2009 (UTC) Delete Doesn't seem to be of much use. Kayau Jane Eyre PRIDE AND PREJUDICE les miserables 13:01, 25 July 2009 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete Magioladitis ( talk) 16:45, 25 July 2009 (UTC)
Just as consensus is being reached that this Michelle Bentley-created template defies many of Wikipedia's standards, User:Michelle Bentley creates a new poorly designed (both in terms of visual layout and content) template that violates WP:NPOV and uses one highly contentious and thoroughly debunked source as the basis for its inclusion. GHcool ( talk) 17:31, 18 July 2009 (UTC)
But the people who wants to delete it, should not be allowed to. When we can have a category about american socialists, then of course we can have about neoconservatives - a group which have had a greater impact on America and thus the world, than American socialists have. I realise that there have been discussions about neoconservatives before, but never about American neoconservatives. I can also well understand why a Category called: "American conservatives" doesn't exist, cause they are covered by Category:Republicans (United States). By the way, Carol: Why do you want to 'delete' this wikitable, that shows which thinktanks these individuals are affiliated with. It is in the public interest to know. One could perhaps understand that you want it removed from the page in question (allthough I have difficulty in comprehending that it should cause you any trouble or cause you to loose sleep at night). But why do you want this wikitable removed alltogether?. Michelle Bentley ( talk) 13:40, 20 July 2009 (UTC)