The result of the discussion was close. Redirects are listed for deletion at WP:RfD. JPG-GR ( talk) 18:49, 23 July 2009 (UTC)
Strictly speaking, these are all redirects, but I am nominating them here because they are all used like templates. Specifically, they are used with {{
flag}}, {{
flagicon}}, etc. to render the flag of Macedonia and perhaps a wikilink to the
Republic of Macedonia article with the corresponding template name as display text for that link. In effect, they are alternate "aliases" of
Template:Country data Macedonia. This nomination is is response to
WP:MOSMAC2, which prescribes the instances where the country should be referred to as "former Yugoslav". I have found no instances where these alias templates are needed, and keeping them is a type of POV, in my opinion. If it is absolutely essential to show "former Yugoslav" with a flag template (as is arguably the case in the current
ISO 3166-1 article), then the name
parameter can be used, as per its intent (e.g. {{flag|Macedonia|name=Macedonia, the former Yugoslav Republic of}}
. —
Andrwsc (
talk ·
contribs)
18:45, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
{{flag|Macedonia|name=Macedonia, the former Yugoslav Republic of}}
is entirely sufficient, so I have
no objection to the deletion of these templates.
Anomie
⚔
12:44, 16 July 2009 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. JPG-GR ( talk) 18:52, 23 July 2009 (UTC)
Per MOS:PUNC the correct form is Template:Civil Parishes of King's Lynn and West Norfolk, which exists. No article transcludes this template. ClickRick ( talk) 10:41, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. JPG-GR ( talk) 20:34, 23 July 2009 (UTC)
I do not see the point in having this template as all of the characters are redlinked, non-existent pages, and there doesn't seem to be a need to set about creating pages for them anyway. magnius ( talk) 09:25, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
-- ZydrateSupporter ( talk) 09:45, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was close. Redirects are listed for deletion at WP:RfD. JPG-GR ( talk) 18:49, 23 July 2009 (UTC)
Strictly speaking, these are all redirects, but I am nominating them here because they are all used like templates. Specifically, they are used with {{
flag}}, {{
flagicon}}, etc. to render the flag of Macedonia and perhaps a wikilink to the
Republic of Macedonia article with the corresponding template name as display text for that link. In effect, they are alternate "aliases" of
Template:Country data Macedonia. This nomination is is response to
WP:MOSMAC2, which prescribes the instances where the country should be referred to as "former Yugoslav". I have found no instances where these alias templates are needed, and keeping them is a type of POV, in my opinion. If it is absolutely essential to show "former Yugoslav" with a flag template (as is arguably the case in the current
ISO 3166-1 article), then the name
parameter can be used, as per its intent (e.g. {{flag|Macedonia|name=Macedonia, the former Yugoslav Republic of}}
. —
Andrwsc (
talk ·
contribs)
18:45, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
{{flag|Macedonia|name=Macedonia, the former Yugoslav Republic of}}
is entirely sufficient, so I have
no objection to the deletion of these templates.
Anomie
⚔
12:44, 16 July 2009 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. JPG-GR ( talk) 18:52, 23 July 2009 (UTC)
Per MOS:PUNC the correct form is Template:Civil Parishes of King's Lynn and West Norfolk, which exists. No article transcludes this template. ClickRick ( talk) 10:41, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. JPG-GR ( talk) 20:34, 23 July 2009 (UTC)
I do not see the point in having this template as all of the characters are redlinked, non-existent pages, and there doesn't seem to be a need to set about creating pages for them anyway. magnius ( talk) 09:25, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
-- ZydrateSupporter ( talk) 09:45, 15 July 2009 (UTC)