< January 25 | January 27 > |
---|
The result of the discussion was Keep since the Project wasn't deleted. -- Magioladitis ( talk) 23:14, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
WikiProject no longer exists (see Miscellany for deletion), so the banner should be deleted as well. WOSlinker ( talk) 23:14, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Delete (and move Infobox Golfer Biography to Infobox Golfer) -- Magioladitis ( talk) 00:47, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
Template has been superceeded by Template:Infobox Golfer Biography and is now redundant. bigissue ( talk) 19:05, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Delete -- Magioladitis ( talk) 00:56, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
Unnecessary template for articles that all redirect back to one article (after cleaning up of NPOV splits anyway) -- Collectonian ( talk · contribs) 17:39, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Delete -- Magioladitis ( talk) 23:23, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
Absolutely no reason why we should promote this particular commercial service provider. We are a charity, and promoting a commercial enterprise, which has already got various links to wikipeia (shared directors) looks very bad. Scott Mac (Doc) 16:41, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Procedural close as redirect -- Woody ( talk) 22:57, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
All of these templates were one-off templates (i.e. intended for use in only one article) and were first created in 2006 by User:Joshbaumgartner (notified). Per a discussion at WikiProject Ships, all of these templates have been subst'd on the articles in which they were used and are now being nominated for deletion. — Bellhalla ( talk) 16:41, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Delete since it's redundant and duplicative of a better template and its creator agrees with deletion. -- Magioladitis ( talk) 15:08, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
Redundant and duplicative of the better-documented and more versatile {{ ClinicalTrialsGov}}. Eastlaw talk · contribs 00:38, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
< January 25 | January 27 > |
---|
The result of the discussion was Keep since the Project wasn't deleted. -- Magioladitis ( talk) 23:14, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
WikiProject no longer exists (see Miscellany for deletion), so the banner should be deleted as well. WOSlinker ( talk) 23:14, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Delete (and move Infobox Golfer Biography to Infobox Golfer) -- Magioladitis ( talk) 00:47, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
Template has been superceeded by Template:Infobox Golfer Biography and is now redundant. bigissue ( talk) 19:05, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Delete -- Magioladitis ( talk) 00:56, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
Unnecessary template for articles that all redirect back to one article (after cleaning up of NPOV splits anyway) -- Collectonian ( talk · contribs) 17:39, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Delete -- Magioladitis ( talk) 23:23, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
Absolutely no reason why we should promote this particular commercial service provider. We are a charity, and promoting a commercial enterprise, which has already got various links to wikipeia (shared directors) looks very bad. Scott Mac (Doc) 16:41, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Procedural close as redirect -- Woody ( talk) 22:57, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
All of these templates were one-off templates (i.e. intended for use in only one article) and were first created in 2006 by User:Joshbaumgartner (notified). Per a discussion at WikiProject Ships, all of these templates have been subst'd on the articles in which they were used and are now being nominated for deletion. — Bellhalla ( talk) 16:41, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Delete since it's redundant and duplicative of a better template and its creator agrees with deletion. -- Magioladitis ( talk) 15:08, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
Redundant and duplicative of the better-documented and more versatile {{ ClinicalTrialsGov}}. Eastlaw talk · contribs 00:38, 26 January 2009 (UTC)