< October 20 | October 22 > |
---|
The result of the debate was delete. Garion96 (talk) 20:23, 1 November 2008 (UTC)
This template is completely unnecessary now that all of the character articles have been merged back to the main article and the only separate article left is the episode list. — Dino guy 1000 21:35, 21 October 2008 (UTC)
The result of the debate was delete. Garion96 (talk) 20:23, 1 November 2008 (UTC)
Now replaced by the new parser functions in WP:MED's banner, since WikiProject Neurology is now a subsidary of that project as a task force. This template serves for nostalgia, but that's all. — Cyclonenim ( talk · contribs · email) 16:24, 21 October 2008 (UTC)
The result of the debate was delete. Garion96 (talk) 20:23, 1 November 2008 (UTC)
Unused. Sardanaphalus ( talk) 16:13, 21 October 2008 (UTC)
The result of the debate was delete. Garion96 (talk) 20:23, 1 November 2008 (UTC)
Only two links, one of which is a redlink. Sardanaphalus ( talk) 16:06, 21 October 2008 (UTC)
The result of the debate was keep -- Woohookitty Woohoo! 07:49, 11 November 2008 (UTC)
The alphabetical list in the template has been deleted. -- Alan Liefting ( talk) - 07:25, 21 October 2008 (UTC)
Since my tfd nomination the template has been edited to reflect th updated List of geography topics. See also Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of geography topics (0-9). The template is used on pages where it may create confusion since the alpha list links to sections of another page rather than within the page the template is used on. -- Alan Liefting ( talk) - 20:36, 21 October 2008 (UTC)
Geography |
---|
The result of the debate was delete. List this references was prodded and deleted as well. -- Woohookitty Woohoo! 07:59, 11 November 2008 (UTC)
This template and the associated list has been unreferenced since it's creation. The information is misleading and likely inaccurate. Most of the cities listed has had their borders changed. Some of the cities has been renamed. It is highly unlikely that we will in the future see any population stats for cities such as Durban, Pretoria and Port Elizabeth; population stats will most probably be done on Metro or Local municipality level. I will probably be prudent to remove this permanently or until such time as there are reliable, verifiable stats available. -- 196.11.134.77 ( talk) 08:27, 21 October 2008 (UTC)
< October 20 | October 22 > |
---|
The result of the debate was delete. Garion96 (talk) 20:23, 1 November 2008 (UTC)
This template is completely unnecessary now that all of the character articles have been merged back to the main article and the only separate article left is the episode list. — Dino guy 1000 21:35, 21 October 2008 (UTC)
The result of the debate was delete. Garion96 (talk) 20:23, 1 November 2008 (UTC)
Now replaced by the new parser functions in WP:MED's banner, since WikiProject Neurology is now a subsidary of that project as a task force. This template serves for nostalgia, but that's all. — Cyclonenim ( talk · contribs · email) 16:24, 21 October 2008 (UTC)
The result of the debate was delete. Garion96 (talk) 20:23, 1 November 2008 (UTC)
Unused. Sardanaphalus ( talk) 16:13, 21 October 2008 (UTC)
The result of the debate was delete. Garion96 (talk) 20:23, 1 November 2008 (UTC)
Only two links, one of which is a redlink. Sardanaphalus ( talk) 16:06, 21 October 2008 (UTC)
The result of the debate was keep -- Woohookitty Woohoo! 07:49, 11 November 2008 (UTC)
The alphabetical list in the template has been deleted. -- Alan Liefting ( talk) - 07:25, 21 October 2008 (UTC)
Since my tfd nomination the template has been edited to reflect th updated List of geography topics. See also Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of geography topics (0-9). The template is used on pages where it may create confusion since the alpha list links to sections of another page rather than within the page the template is used on. -- Alan Liefting ( talk) - 20:36, 21 October 2008 (UTC)
Geography |
---|
The result of the debate was delete. List this references was prodded and deleted as well. -- Woohookitty Woohoo! 07:59, 11 November 2008 (UTC)
This template and the associated list has been unreferenced since it's creation. The information is misleading and likely inaccurate. Most of the cities listed has had their borders changed. Some of the cities has been renamed. It is highly unlikely that we will in the future see any population stats for cities such as Durban, Pretoria and Port Elizabeth; population stats will most probably be done on Metro or Local municipality level. I will probably be prudent to remove this permanently or until such time as there are reliable, verifiable stats available. -- 196.11.134.77 ( talk) 08:27, 21 October 2008 (UTC)