The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
delete- per the nomination.
AndreNatas (
talk) 18:37, 9 March 2008 (UTC)reply
*KEEP - What is wrong with this template?Londo06 20:58, 9 March 2008 (UTC)reply
delete - looked through, new template already set up to replace this one, fits in with others already out there, information is the same, the older one is now no longer used, redundant and should be deleted.Londo06 21:08, 9 March 2008 (UTC)reply
Redirect - why not redirect? Seems like a plausible option, too. Since the current template is still in use (albeit only on a few articles) it would remove any need to update links, too.
AllynJ (
talk |
contribs) 19:13, 10 March 2008 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was keep.
John254 00:46, 15 March 2008 (UTC)reply
Keep One almost needs a university degree to figure out Infobox School, I think that the consensus of Australian education editors that Infobox Aust school is a better alternative is a reasonable one. It definitely isn't a case of redundancy of one for another.
Orderinchaos 06:53, 9 March 2008 (UTC)reply
Keep per Twenty Years and Orderinchaos comments - no need to delete something that is a useful alternative
SatuSuro 13:38, 9 March 2008 (UTC)reply
Rollback helped with that one. Several hundred reverts later, we were back where we started.
TwentyYears 15:07, 12 March 2008 (UTC)reply
Keep, similar, but superior (due to simplicity). That's a lot of "S"es.
Lankiveil(
speak to me) 14:55, 9 March 2008 (UTC).reply
Keep Infobox School is a disaster, while this infobox works beautifully for Aust public school articles (and looks a hell of a lot better). If it aint broke, dont fix it!
Loopla (
talk) 11:05, 10 March 2008 (UTC)reply
Keep - per consensus
here that this template does its job better than the proposed alternative. dihydrogen monoxide (
H2O) 06:30, 12 March 2008 (UTC)reply
Keep as per all of above. Has there ever been any thought of merging
Template:Infobox school into this template, instead of the other way around, because I haven't yet seen a template which is totally impossible to use and user-unfriendly, until I saw that one. --
Russavia (
talk) 03:25, 14 March 2008 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
delete- per the nomination.
AndreNatas (
talk) 18:37, 9 March 2008 (UTC)reply
*KEEP - What is wrong with this template?Londo06 20:58, 9 March 2008 (UTC)reply
delete - looked through, new template already set up to replace this one, fits in with others already out there, information is the same, the older one is now no longer used, redundant and should be deleted.Londo06 21:08, 9 March 2008 (UTC)reply
Redirect - why not redirect? Seems like a plausible option, too. Since the current template is still in use (albeit only on a few articles) it would remove any need to update links, too.
AllynJ (
talk |
contribs) 19:13, 10 March 2008 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was keep.
John254 00:46, 15 March 2008 (UTC)reply
Keep One almost needs a university degree to figure out Infobox School, I think that the consensus of Australian education editors that Infobox Aust school is a better alternative is a reasonable one. It definitely isn't a case of redundancy of one for another.
Orderinchaos 06:53, 9 March 2008 (UTC)reply
Keep per Twenty Years and Orderinchaos comments - no need to delete something that is a useful alternative
SatuSuro 13:38, 9 March 2008 (UTC)reply
Rollback helped with that one. Several hundred reverts later, we were back where we started.
TwentyYears 15:07, 12 March 2008 (UTC)reply
Keep, similar, but superior (due to simplicity). That's a lot of "S"es.
Lankiveil(
speak to me) 14:55, 9 March 2008 (UTC).reply
Keep Infobox School is a disaster, while this infobox works beautifully for Aust public school articles (and looks a hell of a lot better). If it aint broke, dont fix it!
Loopla (
talk) 11:05, 10 March 2008 (UTC)reply
Keep - per consensus
here that this template does its job better than the proposed alternative. dihydrogen monoxide (
H2O) 06:30, 12 March 2008 (UTC)reply
Keep as per all of above. Has there ever been any thought of merging
Template:Infobox school into this template, instead of the other way around, because I haven't yet seen a template which is totally impossible to use and user-unfriendly, until I saw that one. --
Russavia (
talk) 03:25, 14 March 2008 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.