The result of the debate was delete all Woohookitty Woohoo! 05:49, 12 April 2008 (UTC) Includes -
The templates above were the old templates to display the list of stations for the Shanghai Metro. Now all of the stations are incorporated into Template:Shanghai Metro, so the old template is not necessary. Heights (Want to talk?) 23:51, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
The result of the debate was Delete Zzyzx11 (Talk) 07:36, 12 April 2008 (UTC)
Template:American Idol already includes runner-ups so DELETE this unnecessary template. — Aspects ( talk) 22:45, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
The result of the debate was delete. IronGargoyle ( talk) 16:50, 20 April 2008 (UTC)
I just think the term "YouTube celebrity" is down to nothing more than speculation. Buc ( talk) 20:58, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
*Reluctant keep. While I tend to think Wikipedia gives too much attention to this type of thing, as long as we have articles on these people, this is a useful template, linking them together by their most notable shared attribute. The only good reason to delete this is that a category might be better, and even then I don't think there's much harm in having both.
Terraxos (
talk) 03:20, 9 April 2008 (UTC) On second thoughts, Delete. There's no need for this template. It does not represent a well-defined group; it's questionable just who is a 'YouTube celebrity', and there's no link between any of these people beyond the fact they've appeared in YouTube videos. Since they're already linked by a category, I think this template is probably unhelpful and unnecessary.
Terraxos (
talk)
01:12, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
The result of the debate was keep Woohookitty Woohoo! 05:02, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
Isn't the the Category:National Football League teams seasons good enough for something like this?. Buc ( talk) 19:27, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
The result of the debate was delete Woohookitty Woohoo! 07:50, 12 April 2008 (UTC)
Wikipedia:WikiProject O-Parts Hunter has been deemed historical, per consensus from its parent project and lack of active participants. As such, its project template is no longer needed. It has already been removed from the few O-Parts Hunters articles.. Collectonian ( talk) 06:48, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
The result of the debate was Keep Zzyzx11 (Talk) 05:46, 14 April 2008 (UTC)
Three reasons. 1. Rather than discuss about the economy, it seems to be mainly about government projects. 2. Topics which included like Pos Malaysia, PKFZ and MEPS is hardly about macroeconomics and it does not aid in bringing understanding the Malaysian economy. 3. No such template for other countries. __earth ( Talk) 03:31, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
The result of the debate was delete all Woohookitty Woohoo! 05:49, 12 April 2008 (UTC) Includes -
The templates above were the old templates to display the list of stations for the Shanghai Metro. Now all of the stations are incorporated into Template:Shanghai Metro, so the old template is not necessary. Heights (Want to talk?) 23:51, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
The result of the debate was Delete Zzyzx11 (Talk) 07:36, 12 April 2008 (UTC)
Template:American Idol already includes runner-ups so DELETE this unnecessary template. — Aspects ( talk) 22:45, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
The result of the debate was delete. IronGargoyle ( talk) 16:50, 20 April 2008 (UTC)
I just think the term "YouTube celebrity" is down to nothing more than speculation. Buc ( talk) 20:58, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
*Reluctant keep. While I tend to think Wikipedia gives too much attention to this type of thing, as long as we have articles on these people, this is a useful template, linking them together by their most notable shared attribute. The only good reason to delete this is that a category might be better, and even then I don't think there's much harm in having both.
Terraxos (
talk) 03:20, 9 April 2008 (UTC) On second thoughts, Delete. There's no need for this template. It does not represent a well-defined group; it's questionable just who is a 'YouTube celebrity', and there's no link between any of these people beyond the fact they've appeared in YouTube videos. Since they're already linked by a category, I think this template is probably unhelpful and unnecessary.
Terraxos (
talk)
01:12, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
The result of the debate was keep Woohookitty Woohoo! 05:02, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
Isn't the the Category:National Football League teams seasons good enough for something like this?. Buc ( talk) 19:27, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
The result of the debate was delete Woohookitty Woohoo! 07:50, 12 April 2008 (UTC)
Wikipedia:WikiProject O-Parts Hunter has been deemed historical, per consensus from its parent project and lack of active participants. As such, its project template is no longer needed. It has already been removed from the few O-Parts Hunters articles.. Collectonian ( talk) 06:48, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
The result of the debate was Keep Zzyzx11 (Talk) 05:46, 14 April 2008 (UTC)
Three reasons. 1. Rather than discuss about the economy, it seems to be mainly about government projects. 2. Topics which included like Pos Malaysia, PKFZ and MEPS is hardly about macroeconomics and it does not aid in bringing understanding the Malaysian economy. 3. No such template for other countries. __earth ( Talk) 03:31, 4 April 2008 (UTC)