The result of the debate was KEEP Seriously. It has it uses. (TINC) -- Drini 17:43, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
Template:Sprotect-banneduser (
|
talk |
history |
links |
watch |
logs)
Preventing edits by sockpuppets is not one of the proper uses of semi-protection as given on
Wikipedia:Semi-protection policy, and
Wikipedia:Sock puppetry does not list semi-protection among the proper ways to deal with sock puppets.
Brian Kendig
21:57, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
The result of the debate was Delete These kinds of things should be done directly, and using a template only makes diffucult handling of category (hides it at the edit dialog, confuses bots, etc)-- Drini 17:35, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
Template:Yp (
|
talk |
history |
links |
watch |
logs)
Is there really a need for a template that simply puts articles into a category? It could easily be subst in a few minutes.
Ricky81682 (
talk)
20:23, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
The result of the debate was delete duplicated functionality-- Drini 18:04, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
Template:World Heritage Sites in Scotland (
|
talk |
history |
links |
watch |
logs)
Duplicates
Template:World Heritage Sites in the United Kingdom, and its use hides the other UK sites for navigation within Scotland.
Astrotrain
20:03, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
The result of the debate was delete -- Drini 18:03, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
Template:Official_name_=_Munster_High_School (
|
talk |
history |
links |
watch |
logs)
Unused, improperly makes use of a city template for a high school.
harpchad
18:49, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
The result of the debate was delete -- Drini 18:02, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
Template:Free to use (
|
talk |
history |
links |
watch |
logs)
I really don't understand what this template is for. It doesn't seem to serve any purpose (but I might be missing something obvious, I don't know). It's also plain text so doesn't really need template space. I say delete, but if I am missing a really obvious use for this template, someone please tell me ;) —
Fire
Fox 16:10, 23 June '06
The result of the debate was redirect listed in wrong discussion, also duplicate listing on June 24, and not speediable (many months old). -- William Allen Simpson 03:34, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
Template:Infobox Wales place with map (
|
talk |
history |
links |
watch |
logs)
Orphaned template. All links have been redirected after the inclusion of an optional map in the main {{
Infobox Wales place}} template. Might well be a
speedy.
DJR (
talk)
15:46, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
The result of the debate was delete superseeded -- Drini 17:47, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
Template:Crash frame (
|
talk |
history |
links |
watch |
logs)
This template was formally used in conjunction with {{
Infobox Aircraft accident}}, among others, on pages regarding aircraft crashes. Now that this template has been merged into {{
Infobox Aircraft accident}}, there's no need for it. It should be deleted.
joturn
e
r
12:31, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
The result of the debate was delete superseeded -- Drini 17:47, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
Template:Crash image (
|
talk |
history |
links |
watch |
logs)
This template was formally used in conjunction with {{
Infobox Aircraft accident}}, among others, on pages regarding aircraft crashes. Now that this template has been merged into {{
Infobox Aircraft accident}}, there's no need for it. It should be deleted.
joturn
e
r
12:31, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
The result of the debate was delete superseeded -- Drini 17:47, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
Template:Crash title (
|
talk |
history |
links |
watch |
logs)
This template was formally used in conjunction with {{
Infobox Aircraft accident}}, among others, on pages regarding aircraft crashes. Now that this template has been merged into {{
Infobox Aircraft accident}}, there's no need for it. It should be deleted.
joturn
e
r
12:31, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
The result of the debate was delete superseeded -- Drini 17:47, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
Template:Aircraft title (
|
talk |
history |
links |
watch |
logs)
This template was formally used in conjunction with {{
Infobox Aircraft accident}}, among others, on pages regarding aircraft crashes. Now that this template has been merged into {{
Infobox Aircraft accident}}, there's no need for it. It should be deleted.
joturn
e
r
12:28, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
The result of the debate was delete -- Drini 17:58, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
Template:User Shinigan Down (
|
talk |
history |
links |
watch |
logs)
Delete. The article for this hoax tv show was deleted five times before its re-creation was blocked. We don't need more of this nonsense. - EurekaLott 03:40, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
The result of the debate was Userfy -- Mr. L e fty Talk to me! 18:09, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
Template:User AAAA (
|
talk |
history |
links |
watch |
logs)
AAAAAA AAAA AAAAAAAA AAA! AAAA, AAA! ... Seriously, could this qualify under "patent nonsense"?
TheProject
00:58, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
The result of the debate was KEEP Seriously. It has it uses. (TINC) -- Drini 17:43, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
Template:Sprotect-banneduser (
|
talk |
history |
links |
watch |
logs)
Preventing edits by sockpuppets is not one of the proper uses of semi-protection as given on
Wikipedia:Semi-protection policy, and
Wikipedia:Sock puppetry does not list semi-protection among the proper ways to deal with sock puppets.
Brian Kendig
21:57, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
The result of the debate was Delete These kinds of things should be done directly, and using a template only makes diffucult handling of category (hides it at the edit dialog, confuses bots, etc)-- Drini 17:35, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
Template:Yp (
|
talk |
history |
links |
watch |
logs)
Is there really a need for a template that simply puts articles into a category? It could easily be subst in a few minutes.
Ricky81682 (
talk)
20:23, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
The result of the debate was delete duplicated functionality-- Drini 18:04, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
Template:World Heritage Sites in Scotland (
|
talk |
history |
links |
watch |
logs)
Duplicates
Template:World Heritage Sites in the United Kingdom, and its use hides the other UK sites for navigation within Scotland.
Astrotrain
20:03, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
The result of the debate was delete -- Drini 18:03, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
Template:Official_name_=_Munster_High_School (
|
talk |
history |
links |
watch |
logs)
Unused, improperly makes use of a city template for a high school.
harpchad
18:49, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
The result of the debate was delete -- Drini 18:02, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
Template:Free to use (
|
talk |
history |
links |
watch |
logs)
I really don't understand what this template is for. It doesn't seem to serve any purpose (but I might be missing something obvious, I don't know). It's also plain text so doesn't really need template space. I say delete, but if I am missing a really obvious use for this template, someone please tell me ;) —
Fire
Fox 16:10, 23 June '06
The result of the debate was redirect listed in wrong discussion, also duplicate listing on June 24, and not speediable (many months old). -- William Allen Simpson 03:34, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
Template:Infobox Wales place with map (
|
talk |
history |
links |
watch |
logs)
Orphaned template. All links have been redirected after the inclusion of an optional map in the main {{
Infobox Wales place}} template. Might well be a
speedy.
DJR (
talk)
15:46, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
The result of the debate was delete superseeded -- Drini 17:47, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
Template:Crash frame (
|
talk |
history |
links |
watch |
logs)
This template was formally used in conjunction with {{
Infobox Aircraft accident}}, among others, on pages regarding aircraft crashes. Now that this template has been merged into {{
Infobox Aircraft accident}}, there's no need for it. It should be deleted.
joturn
e
r
12:31, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
The result of the debate was delete superseeded -- Drini 17:47, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
Template:Crash image (
|
talk |
history |
links |
watch |
logs)
This template was formally used in conjunction with {{
Infobox Aircraft accident}}, among others, on pages regarding aircraft crashes. Now that this template has been merged into {{
Infobox Aircraft accident}}, there's no need for it. It should be deleted.
joturn
e
r
12:31, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
The result of the debate was delete superseeded -- Drini 17:47, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
Template:Crash title (
|
talk |
history |
links |
watch |
logs)
This template was formally used in conjunction with {{
Infobox Aircraft accident}}, among others, on pages regarding aircraft crashes. Now that this template has been merged into {{
Infobox Aircraft accident}}, there's no need for it. It should be deleted.
joturn
e
r
12:31, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
The result of the debate was delete superseeded -- Drini 17:47, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
Template:Aircraft title (
|
talk |
history |
links |
watch |
logs)
This template was formally used in conjunction with {{
Infobox Aircraft accident}}, among others, on pages regarding aircraft crashes. Now that this template has been merged into {{
Infobox Aircraft accident}}, there's no need for it. It should be deleted.
joturn
e
r
12:28, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
The result of the debate was delete -- Drini 17:58, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
Template:User Shinigan Down (
|
talk |
history |
links |
watch |
logs)
Delete. The article for this hoax tv show was deleted five times before its re-creation was blocked. We don't need more of this nonsense. - EurekaLott 03:40, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
The result of the debate was Userfy -- Mr. L e fty Talk to me! 18:09, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
Template:User AAAA (
|
talk |
history |
links |
watch |
logs)
AAAAAA AAAA AAAAAAAA AAA! AAAA, AAA! ... Seriously, could this qualify under "patent nonsense"?
TheProject
00:58, 23 June 2006 (UTC)