The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 03:41, 21 September 2009 (UTC)
Unused, unmaintained and redundant. Andy Mabbett (User:Pigsonthewing); Andy's talk; Andy's edits 22:03, 13 September 2009 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete after converting all uses to {{infobox character}}
.
Plastikspork
―Œ(talk) 19:10, 20 September 2009 (UTC)
Inappropriate, overly in-universe and non-neutral show specific infobox template already better served by the fuller, more universal, and more real-world focused Template:Infobox character -- Collectonian ( talk · contribs) 16:24, 13 September 2009 (UTC)
{{Infobox character}}
. The more general template appears to have everything this one does except the "good/evil" color coding, which is dubious for NPOV. As with some other situations we've been discussing recently, this is unnecessary fragmentation where it would be better to standardize. --
RL0919 (
talk) 17:12, 13 September 2009 (UTC){{Infobox character}}
per RL0919.
Andy Mabbett (User:Pigsonthewing);
Andy's talk;
Andy's edits 21:40, 13 September 2009 (UTC)The result of the discussion was delete after converting all uses to {{infobox character}}
.
Plastikspork
―Œ(talk) 19:11, 20 September 2009 (UTC)
Unnecessary and inappropriate show specific infobox; Already better served by the fuller and more real-world focused Template:Infobox character without the excessively heavy in-universe aspect. -- Collectonian ( talk · contribs) 16:22, 13 September 2009 (UTC)
{{Infobox character}}
. The more general template appears to have everything this one does except the "good/evil" color coding, which is dubious for NPOV. As with some other situations we've been discussing recently, this is unnecessary fragmentation where it would be better to standardize. --
RL0919 (
talk) 17:11, 13 September 2009 (UTC){{Infobox character}}
per RL0919.
Andy Mabbett (User:Pigsonthewing);
Andy's talk;
Andy's edits 21:41, 13 September 2009 (UTC)The result of the discussion was delete per T3 as unnecessary navigation for only one album. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 05:45, 14 September 2009 (UTC)
Unnecessary navigational template: This band has only one album, the members do not have articles, the label doesn't have an article (recently speedied), and I have put the band themselves up for AfD. Even if it passes AfD, there's no need for a navigational template with only one link in it. rʨanaɢ talk/ contribs 11:21, 13 September 2009 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 03:41, 21 September 2009 (UTC)
Unused, unmaintained and redundant. Andy Mabbett (User:Pigsonthewing); Andy's talk; Andy's edits 22:03, 13 September 2009 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete after converting all uses to {{infobox character}}
.
Plastikspork
―Œ(talk) 19:10, 20 September 2009 (UTC)
Inappropriate, overly in-universe and non-neutral show specific infobox template already better served by the fuller, more universal, and more real-world focused Template:Infobox character -- Collectonian ( talk · contribs) 16:24, 13 September 2009 (UTC)
{{Infobox character}}
. The more general template appears to have everything this one does except the "good/evil" color coding, which is dubious for NPOV. As with some other situations we've been discussing recently, this is unnecessary fragmentation where it would be better to standardize. --
RL0919 (
talk) 17:12, 13 September 2009 (UTC){{Infobox character}}
per RL0919.
Andy Mabbett (User:Pigsonthewing);
Andy's talk;
Andy's edits 21:40, 13 September 2009 (UTC)The result of the discussion was delete after converting all uses to {{infobox character}}
.
Plastikspork
―Œ(talk) 19:11, 20 September 2009 (UTC)
Unnecessary and inappropriate show specific infobox; Already better served by the fuller and more real-world focused Template:Infobox character without the excessively heavy in-universe aspect. -- Collectonian ( talk · contribs) 16:22, 13 September 2009 (UTC)
{{Infobox character}}
. The more general template appears to have everything this one does except the "good/evil" color coding, which is dubious for NPOV. As with some other situations we've been discussing recently, this is unnecessary fragmentation where it would be better to standardize. --
RL0919 (
talk) 17:11, 13 September 2009 (UTC){{Infobox character}}
per RL0919.
Andy Mabbett (User:Pigsonthewing);
Andy's talk;
Andy's edits 21:41, 13 September 2009 (UTC)The result of the discussion was delete per T3 as unnecessary navigation for only one album. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 05:45, 14 September 2009 (UTC)
Unnecessary navigational template: This band has only one album, the members do not have articles, the label doesn't have an article (recently speedied), and I have put the band themselves up for AfD. Even if it passes AfD, there's no need for a navigational template with only one link in it. rʨanaɢ talk/ contribs 11:21, 13 September 2009 (UTC)