The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete.
Garion96(talk) 11:56, 22 May 2009 (UTC)reply
Delete Pointless template.--
Yankees10 22:58, 11 May 2009 (UTC)reply
Not Delete I don't see a reason for deletion...What is the real reason? Anyway, would it be better as a list?
Daalo194—Preceding
undated comment added 23:12, 11 May 2009 (UTC).reply
Delete, not appropriate for a navbox. Also, those colors hurt my eyes. —
Twas Now (
talk •
contribs •
e-mail ) 01:11, 14 May 2009 (UTC)reply
Not Delete It is useful, since it can be vrey helpful to keep track and navigate easier. —Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Daalo194 (
talk •
contribs) 17:16, 16 May 2009 (UTC)reply
Delete - this would be fine as a list or category, but it's not particularly useful as a navigational template.
Robofish (
talk) 08:43, 20 May 2009 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was redirect to {{Bioware games}}. The template has a non-trivial edit history so deletion is out hand. --
Magioladitis (
talk) 19:47, 22 May 2009 (UTC)reply
Comment I don't think the merge target has an appropriate name. Perhaps it should be renamed to {{BioWare}}76.66.202.139 (
talk) 04:09, 12 May 2009 (UTC)reply
Redirect to target, since it is redundant. The target's name can be dealt with later. —
Twas Now (
talk •
contribs •
e-mail ) 01:09, 14 May 2009 (UTC)reply
Redirect or Delete per nom.
Robofish (
talk) 08:44, 20 May 2009 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete, In the future feel free to recreate or request undelete. --
Magioladitis (
talk) 19:38, 22 May 2009 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete.
Garion96(talk) 11:56, 22 May 2009 (UTC)reply
Delete Pointless template.--
Yankees10 22:58, 11 May 2009 (UTC)reply
Not Delete I don't see a reason for deletion...What is the real reason? Anyway, would it be better as a list?
Daalo194—Preceding
undated comment added 23:12, 11 May 2009 (UTC).reply
Delete, not appropriate for a navbox. Also, those colors hurt my eyes. —
Twas Now (
talk •
contribs •
e-mail ) 01:11, 14 May 2009 (UTC)reply
Not Delete It is useful, since it can be vrey helpful to keep track and navigate easier. —Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Daalo194 (
talk •
contribs) 17:16, 16 May 2009 (UTC)reply
Delete - this would be fine as a list or category, but it's not particularly useful as a navigational template.
Robofish (
talk) 08:43, 20 May 2009 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was redirect to {{Bioware games}}. The template has a non-trivial edit history so deletion is out hand. --
Magioladitis (
talk) 19:47, 22 May 2009 (UTC)reply
Comment I don't think the merge target has an appropriate name. Perhaps it should be renamed to {{BioWare}}76.66.202.139 (
talk) 04:09, 12 May 2009 (UTC)reply
Redirect to target, since it is redundant. The target's name can be dealt with later. —
Twas Now (
talk •
contribs •
e-mail ) 01:09, 14 May 2009 (UTC)reply
Redirect or Delete per nom.
Robofish (
talk) 08:44, 20 May 2009 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete, In the future feel free to recreate or request undelete. --
Magioladitis (
talk) 19:38, 22 May 2009 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.