The result of the discussion was Delete. looks like a G7 on top of the usual arguments.. Happy‑ melon 21:10, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
Unused and redundant to Template:Layout engines. — Remember the dot ( talk) 23:36, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Delete. Happy‑ melon 21:08, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
Excluding the author link, this navbox only links together three articles, one of which (the media list) is an inappropriate split per WP:ANIME consensus. The series could probably support three sublists (definitely a chapter and an episode list, maybe a character list), and at such time as these get created, the necessity of a navbox can be revisited. Until then, though, there's no harm in deleting it. Oh, and can anyone tell me why the navbox is broken at the bottom of Hikaru no Go? I'm not seeing anything in the source of either the template or the article that would be causing it... am I just blind? 「 ダイノ ガイ 千?!」(Dinoguy1000) 21:34, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Delete. Happy‑ melon 21:06, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
I believe this template should also be deleted. Although it predates the redundant Template:Catscratch, on further investigating I realized that neither Navbox is useful. Most pages relating to the show Catscratch were merged into the main article, making any Navbox no useless. Aside from that this template is not used anywhere on Wikipedia, which is one of the accepted reasons for template deletion. Danleary25 ( talk) 10:55, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Delete. Happy‑ melon 21:07, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
This template has a number of problems which meet Wikipedia's reasons for deletion 1)It's redundant. Template:CatscratchNav has already existed for years (although it is not used and should be deleted itself, but that's not part of this discussion) 2)The template is not used. It was never placed on any of the pages it links to (except one). Which brings me to: 3)Half the links it uses go to the same page. For instance all the characters list to the main article of the television show. I believe this is sufficient reason to delete the template Danleary25 ( talk) 10:40, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was keep. Erik9 ( talk) 00:26, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
Unused, partially implemented and error-ridden template. 67.101.7.230 ( talk) 02:16, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
Comment The poetry project never had the chance to fully adapt the infobox or begin implementing it. We have tested it at " Annabel Lee" but the project has hills and valleys of activity. If it is "error-ridden" it gives us an opportunity to fix it, not delete it. -- Midnightdreary ( talk) 02:21, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Delete. looks like a G7 on top of the usual arguments.. Happy‑ melon 21:10, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
Unused and redundant to Template:Layout engines. — Remember the dot ( talk) 23:36, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Delete. Happy‑ melon 21:08, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
Excluding the author link, this navbox only links together three articles, one of which (the media list) is an inappropriate split per WP:ANIME consensus. The series could probably support three sublists (definitely a chapter and an episode list, maybe a character list), and at such time as these get created, the necessity of a navbox can be revisited. Until then, though, there's no harm in deleting it. Oh, and can anyone tell me why the navbox is broken at the bottom of Hikaru no Go? I'm not seeing anything in the source of either the template or the article that would be causing it... am I just blind? 「 ダイノ ガイ 千?!」(Dinoguy1000) 21:34, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Delete. Happy‑ melon 21:06, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
I believe this template should also be deleted. Although it predates the redundant Template:Catscratch, on further investigating I realized that neither Navbox is useful. Most pages relating to the show Catscratch were merged into the main article, making any Navbox no useless. Aside from that this template is not used anywhere on Wikipedia, which is one of the accepted reasons for template deletion. Danleary25 ( talk) 10:55, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Delete. Happy‑ melon 21:07, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
This template has a number of problems which meet Wikipedia's reasons for deletion 1)It's redundant. Template:CatscratchNav has already existed for years (although it is not used and should be deleted itself, but that's not part of this discussion) 2)The template is not used. It was never placed on any of the pages it links to (except one). Which brings me to: 3)Half the links it uses go to the same page. For instance all the characters list to the main article of the television show. I believe this is sufficient reason to delete the template Danleary25 ( talk) 10:40, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was keep. Erik9 ( talk) 00:26, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
Unused, partially implemented and error-ridden template. 67.101.7.230 ( talk) 02:16, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
Comment The poetry project never had the chance to fully adapt the infobox or begin implementing it. We have tested it at " Annabel Lee" but the project has hills and valleys of activity. If it is "error-ridden" it gives us an opportunity to fix it, not delete it. -- Midnightdreary ( talk) 02:21, 27 February 2009 (UTC)