The result of the discussion was delete Magioladitis ( talk) 00:27, 6 September 2009 (UTC)
Outdated template. Not very usefull even at time of its conception. Debresser ( talk) 23:33, 29 August 2009 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete Magioladitis ( talk) 00:28, 6 September 2009 (UTC)
Unnecessary. Every article on the template is linked in the article on the crash. — Music Maker 5376 20:06, 29 August 2009 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete Magioladitis ( talk) 00:29, 6 September 2009 (UTC)
Not needed. In use on only one page, where I had to remove it, because it is so badly written it causes a references error. But the main thing is that it is just completely redundant. Debresser ( talk) 19:40, 29 August 2009 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete Magioladitis ( talk) 00:30, 6 September 2009 (UTC)
This template is currently unused and redundant to the existing {{ infobox settlement}}. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 19:32, 29 August 2009 (UTC)
The bright pink dot maps were rightly replaced with a higher quality svg pin, see e.g Jelgava... Himalayan 19:51, 29 August 2009 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Redirect to {{ Infobox Non-profit}}. Ruslik_ Zero 18:09, 6 September 2009 (UTC)
Redundant with {{ Infobox Non-profit}}. Both templates are very old and share some parameters. About 100 transclusions. Locos epraix ~ Beastepraix 19:25, 29 August 2009 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was No consensus. Both points of view are equally compelling. Ruslik_ Zero 17:52, 6 September 2009 (UTC)
Unclear message, some redundancy with {{ POV-intro}}. Is a synonyms the important enough to deserve an ambox? Locos epraix ~ Beastepraix 19:02, 29 August 2009 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Delete. If a source is definitely unreliable, then no information from it can be trusted, and therefore the source should be removed. It is unlikely that this template will be ever needed. Ruslik_ Zero 17:45, 6 September 2009 (UTC)
Redundant with {{ Verify credibility}} Locos epraix ~ Beastepraix 18:56, 29 August 2009 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Delete. Obsolete template. Ruslik_ Zero 17:34, 6 September 2009 (UTC)
Narrow focus (3 links) that will not expand, seasons are already linked in the infoboxes at the top of each article and the main topic in the first sentence. This is technically a proxy nom, I'll paste a users' comments that were accidentally placed at STFD. – xeno talk 17:52, 29 August 2009 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete - replace with {{ infobox settlement}}. JPG-GR ( talk) 23:13, 6 September 2009 (UTC)
For the same reasons that the tehsil and union council templates were deleted. Standard infoboxes are more flexible not to mention more presentable. This template is flawed, in many cases where there is a parameter missing it displays the ugly {province} and that kind of syntax. They need cleaning up and converting to standard. Himalayan 12:33, 29 August 2009 (UTC) August 2009 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:30, 5 September 2009 (UTC)
This is a weak template that is inflexible and doesn't allow outside editors who are unfamiliar with the template how to add photos or a location map of Thailand to get some idea where it actually is. I've added a standard template to Amphoe Doi Saket and an example which I believe is a considerable improvement and relays much more info in the box, not to mention looking of a higher standard. I think the template should be switched in the way it has been for Amphoe Doi Saket. Compare it to Amphoe Mae Taeng for example. I would also recommend switching the png maps with a higher quality svg. The creator of these articles has evidently done a lot of great work in this area, I don't want to seem like I am inruding on his turf or anything. If nobody agrees with a location map to see where it is in Thailand that can be removed but I would still recommend converting to standard. Himalayan 11:25, 29 August 2009 (UTC) August 2009 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 19:16, 5 September 2009 (UTC)
Difficult template to manage or follow when you want to add more details, inflexible. Unnecessary and redundant, should be replaced with a standard Template:Infobox settlement and standard pushpin pin map for Bangladesh as I have done for Kumarkhali Upazila. Upazila should be written into the blue bar in the standard settlement template as you see in many articles. Working towards consistency is the best thing.. Himalayan 10:48, 29 August 2009 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was redirect. User:Rich Farmbrough appears to have closed this early by redirecting the template to {{ Contradict}}. Equazcion ( talk) 22:19, 30 August 2009 (UTC)
Seems redundant to {{ Contradict}}, which is far more mature and widely used. — Caesura (t) 00:10, 29 August 2009 (UTC)
;)
.
Locos
epraix ~
Beastepraix
20:18, 29 August 2009 (UTC)The result of the discussion was delete Magioladitis ( talk) 00:27, 6 September 2009 (UTC)
Outdated template. Not very usefull even at time of its conception. Debresser ( talk) 23:33, 29 August 2009 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete Magioladitis ( talk) 00:28, 6 September 2009 (UTC)
Unnecessary. Every article on the template is linked in the article on the crash. — Music Maker 5376 20:06, 29 August 2009 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete Magioladitis ( talk) 00:29, 6 September 2009 (UTC)
Not needed. In use on only one page, where I had to remove it, because it is so badly written it causes a references error. But the main thing is that it is just completely redundant. Debresser ( talk) 19:40, 29 August 2009 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete Magioladitis ( talk) 00:30, 6 September 2009 (UTC)
This template is currently unused and redundant to the existing {{ infobox settlement}}. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 19:32, 29 August 2009 (UTC)
The bright pink dot maps were rightly replaced with a higher quality svg pin, see e.g Jelgava... Himalayan 19:51, 29 August 2009 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Redirect to {{ Infobox Non-profit}}. Ruslik_ Zero 18:09, 6 September 2009 (UTC)
Redundant with {{ Infobox Non-profit}}. Both templates are very old and share some parameters. About 100 transclusions. Locos epraix ~ Beastepraix 19:25, 29 August 2009 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was No consensus. Both points of view are equally compelling. Ruslik_ Zero 17:52, 6 September 2009 (UTC)
Unclear message, some redundancy with {{ POV-intro}}. Is a synonyms the important enough to deserve an ambox? Locos epraix ~ Beastepraix 19:02, 29 August 2009 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Delete. If a source is definitely unreliable, then no information from it can be trusted, and therefore the source should be removed. It is unlikely that this template will be ever needed. Ruslik_ Zero 17:45, 6 September 2009 (UTC)
Redundant with {{ Verify credibility}} Locos epraix ~ Beastepraix 18:56, 29 August 2009 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Delete. Obsolete template. Ruslik_ Zero 17:34, 6 September 2009 (UTC)
Narrow focus (3 links) that will not expand, seasons are already linked in the infoboxes at the top of each article and the main topic in the first sentence. This is technically a proxy nom, I'll paste a users' comments that were accidentally placed at STFD. – xeno talk 17:52, 29 August 2009 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete - replace with {{ infobox settlement}}. JPG-GR ( talk) 23:13, 6 September 2009 (UTC)
For the same reasons that the tehsil and union council templates were deleted. Standard infoboxes are more flexible not to mention more presentable. This template is flawed, in many cases where there is a parameter missing it displays the ugly {province} and that kind of syntax. They need cleaning up and converting to standard. Himalayan 12:33, 29 August 2009 (UTC) August 2009 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:30, 5 September 2009 (UTC)
This is a weak template that is inflexible and doesn't allow outside editors who are unfamiliar with the template how to add photos or a location map of Thailand to get some idea where it actually is. I've added a standard template to Amphoe Doi Saket and an example which I believe is a considerable improvement and relays much more info in the box, not to mention looking of a higher standard. I think the template should be switched in the way it has been for Amphoe Doi Saket. Compare it to Amphoe Mae Taeng for example. I would also recommend switching the png maps with a higher quality svg. The creator of these articles has evidently done a lot of great work in this area, I don't want to seem like I am inruding on his turf or anything. If nobody agrees with a location map to see where it is in Thailand that can be removed but I would still recommend converting to standard. Himalayan 11:25, 29 August 2009 (UTC) August 2009 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 19:16, 5 September 2009 (UTC)
Difficult template to manage or follow when you want to add more details, inflexible. Unnecessary and redundant, should be replaced with a standard Template:Infobox settlement and standard pushpin pin map for Bangladesh as I have done for Kumarkhali Upazila. Upazila should be written into the blue bar in the standard settlement template as you see in many articles. Working towards consistency is the best thing.. Himalayan 10:48, 29 August 2009 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was redirect. User:Rich Farmbrough appears to have closed this early by redirecting the template to {{ Contradict}}. Equazcion ( talk) 22:19, 30 August 2009 (UTC)
Seems redundant to {{ Contradict}}, which is far more mature and widely used. — Caesura (t) 00:10, 29 August 2009 (UTC)
;)
.
Locos
epraix ~
Beastepraix
20:18, 29 August 2009 (UTC)