The result of the debate was keep. -- Core desat 08:36, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
This discussion is too long to transclude. See Wikipedia:Templates for deletion/Template:Trivia.
The result of the debate was delete, early close due to falling under speedy guidelines. Wizardman 23:51, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
Obviously a test of some sort, which has no transclusions and doesn't seem to do anything anyway. I tagged it for speedy deletion, but was told to come here instead. — PC78 14:50, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
The result of the debate was speedy delete per CSD G7; sole author requests deletion. — TKD:: Talk 21:52, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
The template is not used (or was ever used for long), and is unable to provide real-world encyclopedic information. It was created by me for use on faction articles, but is no longer needed due to a change in approach to the treatment of factions. It also creates a sizeable blank area at the top of articles that used it. It should be deleted. — Sabre 13:21, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
The result of the debate was delete. — Malcolm ( talk) 00:07, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
Unused, too informal and rambling, no real use for such a template. — Jack · talk · 02:40, Wednesday, 5 September 2007
The result of the debate was delete after replacing existing uses with {{ split}}. — TKD:: Talk 10:01, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
Function better met by {{ split}}. — Jack · talk · 02:33, Wednesday, 5 September 2007
The result of the debate was keep. -- Core desat 08:36, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
This discussion is too long to transclude. See Wikipedia:Templates for deletion/Template:Trivia.
The result of the debate was delete, early close due to falling under speedy guidelines. Wizardman 23:51, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
Obviously a test of some sort, which has no transclusions and doesn't seem to do anything anyway. I tagged it for speedy deletion, but was told to come here instead. — PC78 14:50, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
The result of the debate was speedy delete per CSD G7; sole author requests deletion. — TKD:: Talk 21:52, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
The template is not used (or was ever used for long), and is unable to provide real-world encyclopedic information. It was created by me for use on faction articles, but is no longer needed due to a change in approach to the treatment of factions. It also creates a sizeable blank area at the top of articles that used it. It should be deleted. — Sabre 13:21, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
The result of the debate was delete. — Malcolm ( talk) 00:07, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
Unused, too informal and rambling, no real use for such a template. — Jack · talk · 02:40, Wednesday, 5 September 2007
The result of the debate was delete after replacing existing uses with {{ split}}. — TKD:: Talk 10:01, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
Function better met by {{ split}}. — Jack · talk · 02:33, Wednesday, 5 September 2007