< January 29 | January 31 > |
---|
The result of the debate was deletion. RyanGerbil10 (Упражнение В!) 04:45, 7 February 2007 (UTC) WP:POINT creation by User:Barberio as part of his ongoing campaign against Wikipedia:Per; he tried getting it deleted last week, and when that failed tried forum shopping on the village pump and some talk pages to get rid of it anyway. His latest attempt is this tag he made yesterday, which is basically an WP:IDONTLIKEIT tag. And related cat Category:Wikipedia Cleanup, which at any rate is redundant with Category:Wikipedia maintenance. >Radiant< 09:42, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
The result of the debate was speedily deleted as essentially a recreation. >Radiant< 09:33, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
This template does the same thing as Template:Catholic-link which was recently deleted per the vote here. All the same reasons for deleting Catholic-link are applicable to this template since it functionally does the same thing (the only difference being it has a new name and multiple variables). See the previous TfD vote for the many positions and rationals on why this template is a bad idea. -- Stbalbach 23:43, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
The result of the debate was speedily deleted by CanadianCaesar as author request after mistaken creation. -- ais523 12:07, 31 January 2007 ( U T C)
I created it before realizing it's redundant. -- Padraic 23:26, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
The result of the debate was deletion. RyanGerbil10 (Упражнение В!) 01:24, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
Not a well-planned template. Intended for use on sports results pages, using Olympic country codes, but not used on any Olympic-related articles. Also assumes that it will be used inside a table, so the template includes table markup to put the two components into separate columns. This is not good design, in my opinion, as it limits the template's possible usage. Finally, it worked by putting a flag icon before an athlete's name in the first column, then a wikilinked country code in the second column. I think it is much clearer to put the flag icon immediately before the country code instead, so I replaced the (very limited) number of instances of this template with calls to the standard {{ flag}} template instead to achieve that visual appearance. -- Andrwsc 19:18, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
The result of the debate was deletion. RyanGerbil10 (Упражнение В!) 01:25, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
Redundant with {{ flagicon}}. No longer used; all instances have been replaced by {{flagicon|xxx|size=yyy}} to render exactly the same image. -- Andrwsc 19:08, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
The result of the debate was deletion. RyanGerbil10 (Упражнение В!) 01:26, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
Redundant with {{ flagicon}}. No longer used; all instances (of which there were very few) have been replaced by {{flagicon|xxx|size=44x40px}} to render exactly the same image. -- Andrwsc 19:05, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
The result of the debate was deletion. RyanGerbil10 (Упражнение В!) 01:26, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
Unused template redundant to Infobox Country. --- RockMFR 18:32, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
The result of the debate was deletion. RyanGerbil10 (Упражнение В!) 01:27, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
Unused template redundant to Infobox Country. --- RockMFR 17:29, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
The result of the debate was deletion. RyanGerbil10 (Упражнение В!) 01:28, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
Unused template redundant to Infobox Country. --- RockMFR 17:29, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
The result of the debate was deletion. RyanGerbil10 (Упражнение В!) 01:28, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
Redundant against Template:Infobox Australian Road, no transclusions. -- Orderinchaos78 10:54, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
The result of the debate was deletion. RyanGerbil10 (Упражнение В!) 01:40, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
This template is redundant and unnecessary. Any image found and uploaded from Flickr under Wiki-appropriate licenses (i.e. CC-BY-SA 2.5 or the like) should simply have that one license template and the specific source the image was obtained from. Jeff 03:05, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
The result of the debate was to keep. RyanGerbil10 (Упражнение В!) 01:41, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
Has been superseded by the better-designed {{ Uw-copyright1}} through {{ Uw-copyright4}}. I would hate to be a well-intentioned newbie and find Template:Cv on my talk page, calling my behavior "unacceptable" and threatening blocking. Of course, copyright violation on Wikipedia is unacceptable, but Cv's wording seems designed specifically to bite the newbies in violation of WP:AGF. Point is, there are better templates available now. Perhaps Template:Cv could redirect to {{ Uw-copyright2}}. -- Quuxplusone 02:51, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
The result of the debate was to keep. RyanGerbil10 (Упражнение В!) 01:42, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
According to WP:IUP, "Fair use icons, logos, drawings, maps, flags, and such should be uploaded in PNG format instead of SVG." Any image with this template can be rescaled to large sizes, violating #3 of WP:FUC and should be tagged with {{ ShouldBePNG}} and then deleted after being converted. -- ShadowHalo 02:49, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
The result of the debate was deletion. RyanGerbil10 (Упражнение В!) 01:56, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
This template is just extraneously duplicating List of The O.C. episodes and Category:The O.C. episodes, it is way to long to be template viable and episode succession (previous - next) is accomplished via the infobox, so Delete. thanks/ Fenton, Matthew Lexic Dark 52278 Alpha 771 14:14, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
< January 29 | January 31 > |
---|
The result of the debate was deletion. RyanGerbil10 (Упражнение В!) 04:45, 7 February 2007 (UTC) WP:POINT creation by User:Barberio as part of his ongoing campaign against Wikipedia:Per; he tried getting it deleted last week, and when that failed tried forum shopping on the village pump and some talk pages to get rid of it anyway. His latest attempt is this tag he made yesterday, which is basically an WP:IDONTLIKEIT tag. And related cat Category:Wikipedia Cleanup, which at any rate is redundant with Category:Wikipedia maintenance. >Radiant< 09:42, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
The result of the debate was speedily deleted as essentially a recreation. >Radiant< 09:33, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
This template does the same thing as Template:Catholic-link which was recently deleted per the vote here. All the same reasons for deleting Catholic-link are applicable to this template since it functionally does the same thing (the only difference being it has a new name and multiple variables). See the previous TfD vote for the many positions and rationals on why this template is a bad idea. -- Stbalbach 23:43, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
The result of the debate was speedily deleted by CanadianCaesar as author request after mistaken creation. -- ais523 12:07, 31 January 2007 ( U T C)
I created it before realizing it's redundant. -- Padraic 23:26, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
The result of the debate was deletion. RyanGerbil10 (Упражнение В!) 01:24, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
Not a well-planned template. Intended for use on sports results pages, using Olympic country codes, but not used on any Olympic-related articles. Also assumes that it will be used inside a table, so the template includes table markup to put the two components into separate columns. This is not good design, in my opinion, as it limits the template's possible usage. Finally, it worked by putting a flag icon before an athlete's name in the first column, then a wikilinked country code in the second column. I think it is much clearer to put the flag icon immediately before the country code instead, so I replaced the (very limited) number of instances of this template with calls to the standard {{ flag}} template instead to achieve that visual appearance. -- Andrwsc 19:18, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
The result of the debate was deletion. RyanGerbil10 (Упражнение В!) 01:25, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
Redundant with {{ flagicon}}. No longer used; all instances have been replaced by {{flagicon|xxx|size=yyy}} to render exactly the same image. -- Andrwsc 19:08, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
The result of the debate was deletion. RyanGerbil10 (Упражнение В!) 01:26, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
Redundant with {{ flagicon}}. No longer used; all instances (of which there were very few) have been replaced by {{flagicon|xxx|size=44x40px}} to render exactly the same image. -- Andrwsc 19:05, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
The result of the debate was deletion. RyanGerbil10 (Упражнение В!) 01:26, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
Unused template redundant to Infobox Country. --- RockMFR 18:32, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
The result of the debate was deletion. RyanGerbil10 (Упражнение В!) 01:27, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
Unused template redundant to Infobox Country. --- RockMFR 17:29, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
The result of the debate was deletion. RyanGerbil10 (Упражнение В!) 01:28, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
Unused template redundant to Infobox Country. --- RockMFR 17:29, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
The result of the debate was deletion. RyanGerbil10 (Упражнение В!) 01:28, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
Redundant against Template:Infobox Australian Road, no transclusions. -- Orderinchaos78 10:54, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
The result of the debate was deletion. RyanGerbil10 (Упражнение В!) 01:40, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
This template is redundant and unnecessary. Any image found and uploaded from Flickr under Wiki-appropriate licenses (i.e. CC-BY-SA 2.5 or the like) should simply have that one license template and the specific source the image was obtained from. Jeff 03:05, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
The result of the debate was to keep. RyanGerbil10 (Упражнение В!) 01:41, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
Has been superseded by the better-designed {{ Uw-copyright1}} through {{ Uw-copyright4}}. I would hate to be a well-intentioned newbie and find Template:Cv on my talk page, calling my behavior "unacceptable" and threatening blocking. Of course, copyright violation on Wikipedia is unacceptable, but Cv's wording seems designed specifically to bite the newbies in violation of WP:AGF. Point is, there are better templates available now. Perhaps Template:Cv could redirect to {{ Uw-copyright2}}. -- Quuxplusone 02:51, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
The result of the debate was to keep. RyanGerbil10 (Упражнение В!) 01:42, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
According to WP:IUP, "Fair use icons, logos, drawings, maps, flags, and such should be uploaded in PNG format instead of SVG." Any image with this template can be rescaled to large sizes, violating #3 of WP:FUC and should be tagged with {{ ShouldBePNG}} and then deleted after being converted. -- ShadowHalo 02:49, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
The result of the debate was deletion. RyanGerbil10 (Упражнение В!) 01:56, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
This template is just extraneously duplicating List of The O.C. episodes and Category:The O.C. episodes, it is way to long to be template viable and episode succession (previous - next) is accomplished via the infobox, so Delete. thanks/ Fenton, Matthew Lexic Dark 52278 Alpha 771 14:14, 30 January 2007 (UTC)