The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Unused template →
AzaToth 11:55, 13 October 2006 (UTC)reply
Delete per nom.
Punkmorten 12:14, 16 October 2006 (UTC)reply
Weak delete: I mildly like the concept, but not enough to try to fix the broken implementation (hidden structure).
Xtifrtälk 03:28, 17 October 2006 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Unused. Defunct.
Ligulem 22:45, 13 October 2006 (UTC)reply
Delete per nom.
Cedars 01:12, 14 October 2006 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Unused. Defunct.
Ligulem 23:09, 13 October 2006 (UTC)reply
Delete per nom.
Cedars 01:11, 14 October 2006 (UTC)reply
Delete per nom.
Punkmorten 12:15, 16 October 2006 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Unused template →
AzaToth 11:55, 13 October 2006 (UTC)reply
Delete per nom.
Punkmorten 12:14, 16 October 2006 (UTC)reply
Weak delete: I mildly like the concept, but not enough to try to fix the broken implementation (hidden structure).
Xtifrtälk 03:28, 17 October 2006 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Unused. Defunct.
Ligulem 22:45, 13 October 2006 (UTC)reply
Delete per nom.
Cedars 01:12, 14 October 2006 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Unused. Defunct.
Ligulem 23:09, 13 October 2006 (UTC)reply
Delete per nom.
Cedars 01:11, 14 October 2006 (UTC)reply
Delete per nom.
Punkmorten 12:15, 16 October 2006 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.