The following is an episode review discussion that is intended to evaluate articles for individual episodes. See WP:TV-REVIEW and WP:EPISODE for more info.
Per WP:EPISODE, not every episode of a TV show should likely have an individual article. This can be for many reasons, such as notability or sources, or even just what format fits best for that show.
The review process for episode articles is evolving. This set of episode articles has already been reviewed once on a separate page (see below). Due to some concerns about people not knowing about the review, as well as simply experimenting with reviewing the same set twice, we're opening a second discussion.
The following articles lack real world information, besides basic infobox stuff — and the latter ones lack infoboxes:
Season 2
Season 2
Season 3
possible special cases
I have reviewed all of the above articles and find them all to be unsourced and merely plot summaries. I propose that they all be redirected to this LOE. -- Jack Merridew 11:00, 21 July 2007 (UTC)
I would agree with merging all of them, except for the "Special cases". The emmy nod, if sourced, could qualify it being kept, and the movie one could probably have sources. Other than that, they all fail WP:EPISODE. I (said) (did) 11:24, 21 July 2007 (UTC)
The issue of this "TV movie" is specifically mentioned at: Television movie#Movie-length episodes of TV shows. This is not really a movie or a TV Movie — it is an over-hyped episode. -- Jack Merridew 12:48, 22 July 2007 (UTC)
In addition to my comments. If we're sure that the episode was not nominated for an emmy, then there is no reason to keep the episode, an emmy nod could and should be said on the main article. As to the TV movie/overhyped episode/movie, there might be some outside coverage. If there is, then it can be kept, but maybe remove the episode infobox, just as a movie ish. This might be enough of a source to assert notability. I don't know if a review by Rotten Tomatoes is notability asserting. Granted, there are no reviews, but the movie is on there as its own entity, not as an episode. Here it is I (said) (did) 12:57, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
Nick does appear to have sold the world on the idea that their 48 minute thang is a 'movie'. Note that IMDB says it's 60 minutes and Rotten Tomatoes says 1 hour, 40 minutes. At this point I'd redirect all except the 'movie' (unless someone finds a source for an emmy nom for the episode). -- Jack Merridew 08:57, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
This discussion has gone quiet and no one has made any case for episodes other than the quasi-movie. Absent an epiphany, I will be redirecting all-save-the-one soon. It should be noted that no one has actually added any sources to the movie-sode... and if that remains the case, it will still be failing to assert its notability. -- Jack Merridew 10:36, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
The following is an episode review discussion that is intended to evaluate articles for individual episodes. See WP:TV-REVIEW and WP:EPISODE for more info.
Per WP:EPISODE, not every episode of a TV show should likely have an individual article. This can be for many reasons, such as notability or sources, or even just what format fits best for that show.
The review process for episode articles is evolving. This set of episode articles has already been reviewed once on a separate page (see below). Due to some concerns about people not knowing about the review, as well as simply experimenting with reviewing the same set twice, we're opening a second discussion.
The following articles lack real world information, besides basic infobox stuff — and the latter ones lack infoboxes:
Season 2
Season 2
Season 3
possible special cases
I have reviewed all of the above articles and find them all to be unsourced and merely plot summaries. I propose that they all be redirected to this LOE. -- Jack Merridew 11:00, 21 July 2007 (UTC)
I would agree with merging all of them, except for the "Special cases". The emmy nod, if sourced, could qualify it being kept, and the movie one could probably have sources. Other than that, they all fail WP:EPISODE. I (said) (did) 11:24, 21 July 2007 (UTC)
The issue of this "TV movie" is specifically mentioned at: Television movie#Movie-length episodes of TV shows. This is not really a movie or a TV Movie — it is an over-hyped episode. -- Jack Merridew 12:48, 22 July 2007 (UTC)
In addition to my comments. If we're sure that the episode was not nominated for an emmy, then there is no reason to keep the episode, an emmy nod could and should be said on the main article. As to the TV movie/overhyped episode/movie, there might be some outside coverage. If there is, then it can be kept, but maybe remove the episode infobox, just as a movie ish. This might be enough of a source to assert notability. I don't know if a review by Rotten Tomatoes is notability asserting. Granted, there are no reviews, but the movie is on there as its own entity, not as an episode. Here it is I (said) (did) 12:57, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
Nick does appear to have sold the world on the idea that their 48 minute thang is a 'movie'. Note that IMDB says it's 60 minutes and Rotten Tomatoes says 1 hour, 40 minutes. At this point I'd redirect all except the 'movie' (unless someone finds a source for an emmy nom for the episode). -- Jack Merridew 08:57, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
This discussion has gone quiet and no one has made any case for episodes other than the quasi-movie. Absent an epiphany, I will be redirecting all-save-the-one soon. It should be noted that no one has actually added any sources to the movie-sode... and if that remains the case, it will still be failing to assert its notability. -- Jack Merridew 10:36, 30 July 2007 (UTC)