Tube bar (
talk ·
contribs ·
deleted contribs ·
page moves ·
block user ·
block log)
Stonic (
talk ·
contribs ·
deleted contribs ·
page moves ·
block user ·
block log)
4.153.59.194 (
talk ·
contribs ·
deleted contribs ·
page moves ·
block user ·
block log)
Rockgardenmagic (
talk ·
contribs ·
deleted contribs ·
page moves ·
block user ·
block log)
-- Marty Goldberg ( talk) 18:57, 25 January 2008 (UTC) reply
This user is the previously indefinitely blocked user Stonic. He has begun spamming links to Digital Press again:
08:37, 23 January 2008 (hist) (diff) Easter egg (→External links)
Likewise, in trying to continually push for recreation of the twice deleted Digital Press page, he has identified himself via the Digital Press forums:
"the trouble with Wikipedia", where he is also trying to incite people regarding the issue.
Disagree First of all, there doesn't seem to be a crystal-clear connection between the IP and the user Stonic. Discussion on a talk page are highly appropriate for such an item. While the desire of such a user to add material to Wikipedia is certainly valid, his use of a different account doesn't meet the criteria of a sockpuppet (
Please note that all users are explicitly allowed to start over). He has not spammed links, but only one link; such a categorization is misleading. The provided web-based link does not link to a page the general populous has access to or has been deleted from the website. Combined with the lack of diffs or other clear evidence I do not see a violation of
WP:SOCK at this time. Please feel free to add more information if you have it (see other nominations for examples).
— BQZip01 —
talk
00:38, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
reply
A) The link he added was the exact reason he was blocked indefinitely the last time - he was spamming links to that site. What's the very first thing he does creating the new account? Adds another link to that site. That's hardly misleading. B) As far as what's on the page, I'm including a copy of the post here (the website forum is free and open to the general populace, you just have to register, there is no fee). The first is where he identifies himself as the same previously blocked person:
(proceeds to copy argument from his wiki talk page)
Then there's this post where he states his intent to keep the pattern of adding those links here:
-- Marty Goldberg ( talk) 02:12, 27 January 2008 (UTC) reply
Agree Confirmed. It's him. StagParty ( talk) 22:04, 28 January 2008 (UTC) reply
Agree I think these latest edits prove a pattern of disruption. Any users that perpetuate this disruption (whether intentional or unintentional) should share the fate of the primary user. Indef blocks all around... — BQZip01 — talk 05:59, 30 January 2008 (UTC) reply
Please contact Wikiproject Spam and ask them whether the domain that is being spammed can be blacklisted. This will end the sock puppetry by depriving the motive. Jehochman Talk 05:59, 30 January 2008 (UTC) reply
Not convinced of the IP, but did tag him. Indef blocks on all named accounts. Notified spam project. The master is Stonic, not Tube bar. — Rlevse • Talk • 22:24, 30 January 2008 (UTC) reply
Tube bar (
talk ·
contribs ·
deleted contribs ·
page moves ·
block user ·
block log)
Stonic (
talk ·
contribs ·
deleted contribs ·
page moves ·
block user ·
block log)
4.153.59.194 (
talk ·
contribs ·
deleted contribs ·
page moves ·
block user ·
block log)
Rockgardenmagic (
talk ·
contribs ·
deleted contribs ·
page moves ·
block user ·
block log)
-- Marty Goldberg ( talk) 18:57, 25 January 2008 (UTC) reply
This user is the previously indefinitely blocked user Stonic. He has begun spamming links to Digital Press again:
08:37, 23 January 2008 (hist) (diff) Easter egg (→External links)
Likewise, in trying to continually push for recreation of the twice deleted Digital Press page, he has identified himself via the Digital Press forums:
"the trouble with Wikipedia", where he is also trying to incite people regarding the issue.
Disagree First of all, there doesn't seem to be a crystal-clear connection between the IP and the user Stonic. Discussion on a talk page are highly appropriate for such an item. While the desire of such a user to add material to Wikipedia is certainly valid, his use of a different account doesn't meet the criteria of a sockpuppet (
Please note that all users are explicitly allowed to start over). He has not spammed links, but only one link; such a categorization is misleading. The provided web-based link does not link to a page the general populous has access to or has been deleted from the website. Combined with the lack of diffs or other clear evidence I do not see a violation of
WP:SOCK at this time. Please feel free to add more information if you have it (see other nominations for examples).
— BQZip01 —
talk
00:38, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
reply
A) The link he added was the exact reason he was blocked indefinitely the last time - he was spamming links to that site. What's the very first thing he does creating the new account? Adds another link to that site. That's hardly misleading. B) As far as what's on the page, I'm including a copy of the post here (the website forum is free and open to the general populace, you just have to register, there is no fee). The first is where he identifies himself as the same previously blocked person:
(proceeds to copy argument from his wiki talk page)
Then there's this post where he states his intent to keep the pattern of adding those links here:
-- Marty Goldberg ( talk) 02:12, 27 January 2008 (UTC) reply
Agree Confirmed. It's him. StagParty ( talk) 22:04, 28 January 2008 (UTC) reply
Agree I think these latest edits prove a pattern of disruption. Any users that perpetuate this disruption (whether intentional or unintentional) should share the fate of the primary user. Indef blocks all around... — BQZip01 — talk 05:59, 30 January 2008 (UTC) reply
Please contact Wikiproject Spam and ask them whether the domain that is being spammed can be blacklisted. This will end the sock puppetry by depriving the motive. Jehochman Talk 05:59, 30 January 2008 (UTC) reply
Not convinced of the IP, but did tag him. Indef blocks on all named accounts. Notified spam project. The master is Stonic, not Tube bar. — Rlevse • Talk • 22:24, 30 January 2008 (UTC) reply