Totophi (
talk ·
contribs ·
deleted contribs ·
page moves ·
block user ·
block log)
142.167.119.182 (
talk ·
contribs ·
deleted contribs ·
page moves ·
block user ·
block log)
142.167.118.158 (
talk ·
contribs ·
deleted contribs ·
page moves ·
block user ·
block log)
142.167.126.59 (
talk ·
contribs ·
deleted contribs ·
page moves ·
block user ·
block log) - added by
Yechiel (
Shalom)
Nrswanson ( talk) 19:21, 12 June 2008 (UTC) reply
All of these editors are arguing the same point on the Talk:C (musical note)#C4 etc. page which is in contest because of concerns of false claims/original research. They all also have a similar hostile conversational tone which result in direct personal attacks on editor nrswanson based on his personal background (found on user pages) such as education and religion. They also have very short edit histories and appeared right around the same time. The liklihood that three such individuals would appear simultaneously on an article that is not edited often is too much of a coincidence.
We have here a case of WP:NPA, WP:COI and WP:SOCK violations. I would like to see a permenant ban on Totophi and the various 142.167.*.* accounts that he uses.
That should earn him a block for incivility, but not for sockpuppetry. I'll ask KieferSkunk about that. Yechiel ( Shalom) 21:25, 12 June 2008 (UTC) reply
Checkuser filed by Nrswanson: Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Totophi. Yechiel ( Shalom) 21:28, 12 June 2008 (UTC) reply
It is Confirmed by Thatcher that Totophi and the anon are the same user. For incivility and abusive socking (see my comment at the RFCU), Totophi should be blocked for a month. Maybe that's harsh, but I think it's justified. Yechiel ( Shalom) 14:11, 13 June 2008 (UTC) reply
We have proven socking and gross incivility here. I can see both actions, block and leave as warned. Tough call here given the circumstances. But I going with a one week block on the master and all three IPs. Tagged all too. — Rlevse • Talk • 10:15, 19 June 2008 (UTC) reply
Totophi (
talk ·
contribs ·
deleted contribs ·
page moves ·
block user ·
block log)
142.167.119.182 (
talk ·
contribs ·
deleted contribs ·
page moves ·
block user ·
block log)
142.167.118.158 (
talk ·
contribs ·
deleted contribs ·
page moves ·
block user ·
block log)
142.167.126.59 (
talk ·
contribs ·
deleted contribs ·
page moves ·
block user ·
block log) - added by
Yechiel (
Shalom)
Nrswanson ( talk) 19:21, 12 June 2008 (UTC) reply
All of these editors are arguing the same point on the Talk:C (musical note)#C4 etc. page which is in contest because of concerns of false claims/original research. They all also have a similar hostile conversational tone which result in direct personal attacks on editor nrswanson based on his personal background (found on user pages) such as education and religion. They also have very short edit histories and appeared right around the same time. The liklihood that three such individuals would appear simultaneously on an article that is not edited often is too much of a coincidence.
We have here a case of WP:NPA, WP:COI and WP:SOCK violations. I would like to see a permenant ban on Totophi and the various 142.167.*.* accounts that he uses.
That should earn him a block for incivility, but not for sockpuppetry. I'll ask KieferSkunk about that. Yechiel ( Shalom) 21:25, 12 June 2008 (UTC) reply
Checkuser filed by Nrswanson: Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Totophi. Yechiel ( Shalom) 21:28, 12 June 2008 (UTC) reply
It is Confirmed by Thatcher that Totophi and the anon are the same user. For incivility and abusive socking (see my comment at the RFCU), Totophi should be blocked for a month. Maybe that's harsh, but I think it's justified. Yechiel ( Shalom) 14:11, 13 June 2008 (UTC) reply
We have proven socking and gross incivility here. I can see both actions, block and leave as warned. Tough call here given the circumstances. But I going with a one week block on the master and all three IPs. Tagged all too. — Rlevse • Talk • 10:15, 19 June 2008 (UTC) reply