It has been asserted that the user
RunedChozo has been using the account
NotAWeasel as a sockpuppet for the following reason:
It should also be noted that in the past this user has been confirmed to be engaged in the act of sock puppetry with the use of the account Wheelygood, and by acting as a separate person with the IP 129.7.35.126.
If anyone else has further evidence please add them here. - ZakuSage 21:42, 24 January 2007 (UTC) reply
The user RunedChozo has been using the account NotAWeasel to personally harass me in some sort of sick grudge in both editing the article PlayStation Portable and in editing the article's talk page. After the sockpuppet account was banned, the puppeteer user continued to harass me by falsely claiming that I was attempting to claim ownership over the same article. He then went way out of line by making entirely false accusations on the Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#ZakuSage|Administrator's noticeboard]]. I fear continued harassment by this user and will be seeking further help in dealing with him. In the meantime I would like him exposed as the sockpuppeteer he is. - ZakuSage 19:52, 25 January 2007 (UTC) reply
You have no evidence and no case. I have no relation to NotAWeasel, I note that wikipedia policy mentions that users on contentious issues like Beit Hanoun will often arrive. I note that YOU have serious page ownership issues and continually revert any changes made to the PSP article since your version some months ago. I am also tired of your harassment campaign against me. RunedChozo 21:59, 24 January 2007 (UTC) reply
I saw his claim, despite your illegal removal of comments that you just didn't like, and I saw that it had meaning. There's nothing to your so-called proof and you know it. RunedChozo 23:13, 24 January 2007 (UTC) reply
This case is just ZakuSage's bad faith and a method by which he is harassing me. He's done so on a temp page I am working on to try to improve an article, he's lied about me and other users, and he is behaving in nothing but bad faith. I have no problem with a CheckUser because I know it will clear me, just as I know it has already shown before that I am not the person he is accusing me of being. RunedChozo 19:58, 25 January 2007 (UTC) reply
This user is now engaging in moving the report for vandalism purposes. - ZakuSage 20:33, 25 January 2007 (UTC) reply
All named accounts have been indef blocked. Closing. --Akhilleus ( talk) 06:14, 20 February 2007 (UTC) reply
It has been asserted that the user
RunedChozo has been using the account
NotAWeasel as a sockpuppet for the following reason:
It should also be noted that in the past this user has been confirmed to be engaged in the act of sock puppetry with the use of the account Wheelygood, and by acting as a separate person with the IP 129.7.35.126.
If anyone else has further evidence please add them here. - ZakuSage 21:42, 24 January 2007 (UTC) reply
The user RunedChozo has been using the account NotAWeasel to personally harass me in some sort of sick grudge in both editing the article PlayStation Portable and in editing the article's talk page. After the sockpuppet account was banned, the puppeteer user continued to harass me by falsely claiming that I was attempting to claim ownership over the same article. He then went way out of line by making entirely false accusations on the Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#ZakuSage|Administrator's noticeboard]]. I fear continued harassment by this user and will be seeking further help in dealing with him. In the meantime I would like him exposed as the sockpuppeteer he is. - ZakuSage 19:52, 25 January 2007 (UTC) reply
You have no evidence and no case. I have no relation to NotAWeasel, I note that wikipedia policy mentions that users on contentious issues like Beit Hanoun will often arrive. I note that YOU have serious page ownership issues and continually revert any changes made to the PSP article since your version some months ago. I am also tired of your harassment campaign against me. RunedChozo 21:59, 24 January 2007 (UTC) reply
I saw his claim, despite your illegal removal of comments that you just didn't like, and I saw that it had meaning. There's nothing to your so-called proof and you know it. RunedChozo 23:13, 24 January 2007 (UTC) reply
This case is just ZakuSage's bad faith and a method by which he is harassing me. He's done so on a temp page I am working on to try to improve an article, he's lied about me and other users, and he is behaving in nothing but bad faith. I have no problem with a CheckUser because I know it will clear me, just as I know it has already shown before that I am not the person he is accusing me of being. RunedChozo 19:58, 25 January 2007 (UTC) reply
This user is now engaging in moving the report for vandalism purposes. - ZakuSage 20:33, 25 January 2007 (UTC) reply
All named accounts have been indef blocked. Closing. --Akhilleus ( talk) 06:14, 20 February 2007 (UTC) reply