Quixotic92 (
talk
+ ·
contribs ·
deleted contribs ·
tag ·
block user ·
block log ·
CheckUser)
Rrindie126 ( talk + · contribs · deleted contribs · tag · block user · block log · CheckUser)
You guys are insane. If you read the discussion, Kmzgirl said Dominic was HER friend, not mine, not quixotic92's. I do not know him, and I am in no way affiliated with either Kmzgirl and Quixotic92 in any way, shape, or form. What are your guys' problems with newcomers? And if you pull any IP address crap with me or anyone else involved in this for that matter, I'm not going to believe any of it because for all I know you could be making the IP's up. Wasn't this all started over "proof" anyways?
The page got deleted anyways so who the hack cares anyways? And if you also noticed, Kmzgirl and Quixotic92 stated they weren't even gonna come around anymore anyways. Also, isn't the AfD thing supposed to be a discussion where everyone talks about why the page should stay? Since when is discussion DISRUPTION?!?!
Just drop it!
P.S. And if you wanna play this "sockpuppet" game, I have several websites with proof that all of you admins play that game and have several "sockpuppet" accounts yourselves. So if you nail me for an alleged misdemeanor that's not even true, you're all just a bunch of hypocrites. Like I said, JUST DROP IT!
P.P.S. And by the way, you guys weren't establishing a consensus. If you were, we wouldn't be having this discussion because you all wouldn't be sore over the fact I have stuff AGAINST Wikipedia that reveals how you all REALLY work. Besides, aren't you jumping to conclusions by already accusing us all of being sockpuppets, hmm? For all I know, you could be a sockpuppet of CalendarWatcher that's upset because Quixotic92 called them a snotfaced nerd.
Once again... JUST DROP IT!!! -- Rrindie126 ( talk) 01:01, 6 October 2008 (UTC) reply
Ok since all of you CONTINUE to make FALSE ACCUSATIONS, I have posted this on both overseeing mods pages: Edit: Prior to this post I recieved an "attack" notice. I'm not attacking, I'm stating a point.
Alright, I've honestly had enough of all this Wikipedia BS. I have assumed good faith. I have given you all a chance. If you read the talk page on this case, Alexius08 is equally as guilty of not "assuming good faith". Alexius08 just went in and on over irrelevant matter, and was COMPLETELY biased against all of the defendants. Whoever Alexius08 is, they gave us no leniency because they just accused us of everything under the sun with little or no ACTUAL RELEVANT supporting evidence. "Assume good faith"... yeah right! So just to expedite this, I'm going to say some RELEVANT stuff. Wikipedia is a useless corrupted community full of partisan views, and hypocrisy among elitist leaders (a.k.a bullies). Now I know why those articles and blogs about you guys were written. In fact, I'm going to go write one myself, and just to let all of you know, I practically hold the world.
I thought this discussion was over anyways when the article got deleted. Why do you all keep perpetuating this?
-- Rrindie126 ( talk) 02:48, 6 October 2008 (UTC) reply
Note — removing User:Kmzgirl from the case as the checkuser has confirmed that said user is unrelated to the above. Also, there is no proof of meatpuppetry present, as the commenting style is different from the other two users in question. MuZemike ( talk) 07:16, 6 October 2008 (UTC) reply
I don't believe any of it. For all I know you guys could be making all this up. Where's your relevant non-trivial proof from third party sources - not Wikipedia?
And I told you we (kmzgirl and I) weren't related in any way, and I'm not related to quixotic92 contrary to your checkuser report. That is why I do not believe it. --
Rrindie126 (
talk)
14:43, 6 October 2008 (UTC)
reply
I love the way no one has responded on this topic to let all of us know what's going on. Rrindie126 ( talk) 22:20, 6 October 2008 (UTC) reply
The sock (Rrindie126) has been blocked indefinitely. SunDragon34 ( talk) 00:19, 10 October 2008 (UTC) reply
Quixotic92 (
talk
+ ·
contribs ·
deleted contribs ·
tag ·
block user ·
block log ·
CheckUser)
Rrindie126 ( talk + · contribs · deleted contribs · tag · block user · block log · CheckUser)
You guys are insane. If you read the discussion, Kmzgirl said Dominic was HER friend, not mine, not quixotic92's. I do not know him, and I am in no way affiliated with either Kmzgirl and Quixotic92 in any way, shape, or form. What are your guys' problems with newcomers? And if you pull any IP address crap with me or anyone else involved in this for that matter, I'm not going to believe any of it because for all I know you could be making the IP's up. Wasn't this all started over "proof" anyways?
The page got deleted anyways so who the hack cares anyways? And if you also noticed, Kmzgirl and Quixotic92 stated they weren't even gonna come around anymore anyways. Also, isn't the AfD thing supposed to be a discussion where everyone talks about why the page should stay? Since when is discussion DISRUPTION?!?!
Just drop it!
P.S. And if you wanna play this "sockpuppet" game, I have several websites with proof that all of you admins play that game and have several "sockpuppet" accounts yourselves. So if you nail me for an alleged misdemeanor that's not even true, you're all just a bunch of hypocrites. Like I said, JUST DROP IT!
P.P.S. And by the way, you guys weren't establishing a consensus. If you were, we wouldn't be having this discussion because you all wouldn't be sore over the fact I have stuff AGAINST Wikipedia that reveals how you all REALLY work. Besides, aren't you jumping to conclusions by already accusing us all of being sockpuppets, hmm? For all I know, you could be a sockpuppet of CalendarWatcher that's upset because Quixotic92 called them a snotfaced nerd.
Once again... JUST DROP IT!!! -- Rrindie126 ( talk) 01:01, 6 October 2008 (UTC) reply
Ok since all of you CONTINUE to make FALSE ACCUSATIONS, I have posted this on both overseeing mods pages: Edit: Prior to this post I recieved an "attack" notice. I'm not attacking, I'm stating a point.
Alright, I've honestly had enough of all this Wikipedia BS. I have assumed good faith. I have given you all a chance. If you read the talk page on this case, Alexius08 is equally as guilty of not "assuming good faith". Alexius08 just went in and on over irrelevant matter, and was COMPLETELY biased against all of the defendants. Whoever Alexius08 is, they gave us no leniency because they just accused us of everything under the sun with little or no ACTUAL RELEVANT supporting evidence. "Assume good faith"... yeah right! So just to expedite this, I'm going to say some RELEVANT stuff. Wikipedia is a useless corrupted community full of partisan views, and hypocrisy among elitist leaders (a.k.a bullies). Now I know why those articles and blogs about you guys were written. In fact, I'm going to go write one myself, and just to let all of you know, I practically hold the world.
I thought this discussion was over anyways when the article got deleted. Why do you all keep perpetuating this?
-- Rrindie126 ( talk) 02:48, 6 October 2008 (UTC) reply
Note — removing User:Kmzgirl from the case as the checkuser has confirmed that said user is unrelated to the above. Also, there is no proof of meatpuppetry present, as the commenting style is different from the other two users in question. MuZemike ( talk) 07:16, 6 October 2008 (UTC) reply
I don't believe any of it. For all I know you guys could be making all this up. Where's your relevant non-trivial proof from third party sources - not Wikipedia?
And I told you we (kmzgirl and I) weren't related in any way, and I'm not related to quixotic92 contrary to your checkuser report. That is why I do not believe it. --
Rrindie126 (
talk)
14:43, 6 October 2008 (UTC)
reply
I love the way no one has responded on this topic to let all of us know what's going on. Rrindie126 ( talk) 22:20, 6 October 2008 (UTC) reply
The sock (Rrindie126) has been blocked indefinitely. SunDragon34 ( talk) 00:19, 10 October 2008 (UTC) reply