The following discussion is an archived debate of the case of suspected sockpuppetry. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page. All edits should go to the talk page of this case. If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to open a new case of sockpuppetry of the same user,
read this for detailed instructions.
First edit Aturaya07 does is reverting one of my edits
[1], that previously was reverted by Nineveh_209
[2], and directly after I've it reverted back again a new user (Aturaya) reverts it again
[3]. They all have similar names, Aturaya and Aturaya07 obviously socks. And the most likely sockmaster seems to be Nineveh_209.
Comments
I had already explained my first revert to
Taivo (
talk·contribs) which Nineveh_209 also read since he responded to it in Tavio's talkpage, after he had read it he reverted my edit and then suddenly two new accounts with similar Assyrian usernames pops up and reverts my edits (which was their first edits), it seems to me that Aturaya07 and Atuaraya is in fact Nineveh_209 who is trying to edit-war with me so that I will get blocked. I've stopped reverting it back for now since I don't want to engage myself in edit-wars, but methods like these shouldn't be accepted.
I have no relationship with any of those accounts, the accusations above are groundless, I have never heard of those names whatsoever, this user is simply trying to eliminate all opposition that disagrees with his views, look at his history, the issue has been brought up on the talk page regarding the name but he has not taken the time to read any of it. I will not waste my time here anymore explaining things to this incompetent editor who has put me and many others down verbally and constantly manipulates the meanings of words to satisfy his justification of proving his irrelevant claims throughout this encyclopedia. An expert in linguistics has proven this user wrong on several occasions and I have agreed with the expert and this user has dismissed all our views as being stupid, biased, etc without providing any of his own evidence to back up his claims. He is intolerant of other views so has gone to some sad lengths to eliminate established users who discount his uncivil behavior by labeling them as sock puppets. If need be compare my ip address with those users mentioned above me to prove my point. Also try contacting the other user to see he or she will answer to the above accusations. I don’t know if the two above accounts are the same or not But I can say for a fact I have absolute no relationship with them nor have I ever heard of them until I was falsely accused for this. This will be the only comment I make on this situation.
Ninevite (
talk) 22:42, 29 December 2008 (UTC)reply
This is the User Aturaya, I created the User Aturaya07 then after a couple hours decided that the name Aturaya is free so i created that account but i don't know how to delete my Aturaya07 account(which i have no need for) I don't know who ninveh209 is and the mods can do a quick IP check and find out we are two completely different people, I reverted your edits because you are vandalising the page, the discussion with Assyrians/Syriacs on the Aramaic page was already resolved ages ago please read the previous discussion before vandalising the page thanks.
Aturaya (
talk) 14:22, 30 December 2008 (UTC)reply
There's really not much evidence here. I see that
The TriZ and
Nineveh 209 have been in previous disputes in the Assyrian area. Nineveh 209 has been editing since mid-2006, has never been blocked, and has not previously had any sock complaints made about him. Both he and The TriZ seem to have done some good work. The similarity of names of Aturaya07 and Aturaya is adequately explained by Aturaya's comment above. In nationalistic disputes, sometimes people agree with each other without being socks. Lacking the sort of evidence we normally hope to see in sock reports, I suggest that this one be closed.
EdJohnston (
talk) 17:41, 1 January 2009 (UTC)reply
Conclusions
Closed with no admin action, since the evidence is not persuasive and no further comments have come in.
EdJohnston (
talk) 06:21, 5 January 2009 (UTC)reply
The following discussion is an archived debate of the case of suspected sockpuppetry. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page. All edits should go to the talk page of this case. If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to open a new case of sockpuppetry of the same user,
read this for detailed instructions.
First edit Aturaya07 does is reverting one of my edits
[1], that previously was reverted by Nineveh_209
[2], and directly after I've it reverted back again a new user (Aturaya) reverts it again
[3]. They all have similar names, Aturaya and Aturaya07 obviously socks. And the most likely sockmaster seems to be Nineveh_209.
Comments
I had already explained my first revert to
Taivo (
talk·contribs) which Nineveh_209 also read since he responded to it in Tavio's talkpage, after he had read it he reverted my edit and then suddenly two new accounts with similar Assyrian usernames pops up and reverts my edits (which was their first edits), it seems to me that Aturaya07 and Atuaraya is in fact Nineveh_209 who is trying to edit-war with me so that I will get blocked. I've stopped reverting it back for now since I don't want to engage myself in edit-wars, but methods like these shouldn't be accepted.
I have no relationship with any of those accounts, the accusations above are groundless, I have never heard of those names whatsoever, this user is simply trying to eliminate all opposition that disagrees with his views, look at his history, the issue has been brought up on the talk page regarding the name but he has not taken the time to read any of it. I will not waste my time here anymore explaining things to this incompetent editor who has put me and many others down verbally and constantly manipulates the meanings of words to satisfy his justification of proving his irrelevant claims throughout this encyclopedia. An expert in linguistics has proven this user wrong on several occasions and I have agreed with the expert and this user has dismissed all our views as being stupid, biased, etc without providing any of his own evidence to back up his claims. He is intolerant of other views so has gone to some sad lengths to eliminate established users who discount his uncivil behavior by labeling them as sock puppets. If need be compare my ip address with those users mentioned above me to prove my point. Also try contacting the other user to see he or she will answer to the above accusations. I don’t know if the two above accounts are the same or not But I can say for a fact I have absolute no relationship with them nor have I ever heard of them until I was falsely accused for this. This will be the only comment I make on this situation.
Ninevite (
talk) 22:42, 29 December 2008 (UTC)reply
This is the User Aturaya, I created the User Aturaya07 then after a couple hours decided that the name Aturaya is free so i created that account but i don't know how to delete my Aturaya07 account(which i have no need for) I don't know who ninveh209 is and the mods can do a quick IP check and find out we are two completely different people, I reverted your edits because you are vandalising the page, the discussion with Assyrians/Syriacs on the Aramaic page was already resolved ages ago please read the previous discussion before vandalising the page thanks.
Aturaya (
talk) 14:22, 30 December 2008 (UTC)reply
There's really not much evidence here. I see that
The TriZ and
Nineveh 209 have been in previous disputes in the Assyrian area. Nineveh 209 has been editing since mid-2006, has never been blocked, and has not previously had any sock complaints made about him. Both he and The TriZ seem to have done some good work. The similarity of names of Aturaya07 and Aturaya is adequately explained by Aturaya's comment above. In nationalistic disputes, sometimes people agree with each other without being socks. Lacking the sort of evidence we normally hope to see in sock reports, I suggest that this one be closed.
EdJohnston (
talk) 17:41, 1 January 2009 (UTC)reply
Conclusions
Closed with no admin action, since the evidence is not persuasive and no further comments have come in.
EdJohnston (
talk) 06:21, 5 January 2009 (UTC)reply