Ninavizz (
talk ·
contribs ·
deleted contribs ·
page moves ·
block user ·
block log)
67.188.40.44 (
talk ·
contribs ·
deleted contribs ·
page moves ·
block user ·
block log)
67.188.110.143 (
talk ·
contribs ·
deleted contribs ·
page moves ·
block user ·
block log)
HackerToy (
talk ·
contribs ·
deleted contribs ·
page moves ·
block user ·
block log)
Delbertpk (
talk ·
contribs ·
deleted contribs ·
page moves ·
block user ·
block log)
ChoochooBiz (
talk ·
contribs ·
deleted contribs ·
page moves ·
block user ·
block log)
SpiritMovesMee (
talk ·
contribs ·
deleted contribs ·
page moves ·
block user ·
block log)
Flowersprout (
talk ·
contribs ·
deleted contribs ·
page moves ·
block user ·
block log)
EscalanteXP (
talk ·
contribs ·
deleted contribs ·
page moves ·
block user ·
block log)
Norquist9 (
talk ·
contribs ·
deleted contribs ·
page moves ·
block user ·
block log)
Brazensunseeker (
talk ·
contribs ·
deleted contribs ·
page moves ·
block user ·
block log)
Kombatstilettos (
talk ·
contribs ·
deleted contribs ·
page moves ·
block user ·
block log)
Wikiwikimoore ( talk) 21:13, 6 July 2008 (UTC) reply
There is evidence of ongoing sock puppetry starting in August of 07 through present. The editing is with respect to the Violet Blue (author) page. All of the edits are POV pushing on one of three issues. One: attempts to remove as much information about Violet's tenure at SRL. Two: attacks against editors who disagree with Ninavizz, or her sock puppets. Three: attacks and edits around the BoingBoing-Violet issue.
Ninavizz's POV on the SRL issue is made clear in this talk page edit (which strangely was made while not logged in and was manually signed ):
In this edit she tells us, "my edits were not POV pushing about SRL: they were and continue to be, fact, and a fact that I could at the time (and can still) personally substantiate through my direct involvement with SRL". Conveniently we don't need to argue that Ninavizz has been involved in sock puppetry as she admits to it twice. Once in a comment on boingboing.net where Ninavizz states "Wikipedia, that displays a coffeehouse WiFi's IP address that I'd made the 3 Wikipedia edits from (as well as I suppose, sending emails to his account on, months prior- good catch)". (Edits from referenced IP here Special:Contributions/67.188.110.143, SRL POV pushing.) Then again when, as Ninavizz, she edits one of her puppets talk pages to disclose that it was a puppet [ [1]] which she later thinks better of and deletes [ [2]].
Below I list exemplary edits from each puppet:
I clearly have a COI with respect to the violet blue page, which I disclosed, on Feb 8 2007, before making any edits to the page [ [3]]. Regardless of my COI, I feel that, where I may have made some mistakes during my process of learning the culture and practices of Wikipedia, I have been a positive element who tries to come to consensus about changes before making them. It is also clear that Ninavizz has a personal issue with Violet. There are current and ongoing disputes on the page, that clearly include other parties as well, which may or may not include other sock puppets.
I have shown unarguably that Ninavizz has been involved in at least some level of sock puppetry and provided strong evidence of an extensive and long running POV campaign using puppets.
The person placing this report was involved in an action with the subject of the article in which they, at a microphone in a public forum, and without any evidence whatsoever, accused Nina of having been "stalking" them on Wikipedia, and then they outed her wikipedia name. I think we all have seen the baleful effects of outing in our recent loss of NewYorkBrad, and I hope that the admins who review this case will proceed accordingly. This person's allegations AFAIK have nothing whatsoever to back them up except POV and mean-spiritedness. -- BenBurch ( talk) 21:28, 6 July 2008 (UTC) reply
Ninavizz (
talk ·
contribs ·
deleted contribs ·
page moves ·
block user ·
block log)
67.188.40.44 (
talk ·
contribs ·
deleted contribs ·
page moves ·
block user ·
block log)
67.188.110.143 (
talk ·
contribs ·
deleted contribs ·
page moves ·
block user ·
block log)
HackerToy (
talk ·
contribs ·
deleted contribs ·
page moves ·
block user ·
block log)
Delbertpk (
talk ·
contribs ·
deleted contribs ·
page moves ·
block user ·
block log)
ChoochooBiz (
talk ·
contribs ·
deleted contribs ·
page moves ·
block user ·
block log)
SpiritMovesMee (
talk ·
contribs ·
deleted contribs ·
page moves ·
block user ·
block log)
Flowersprout (
talk ·
contribs ·
deleted contribs ·
page moves ·
block user ·
block log)
EscalanteXP (
talk ·
contribs ·
deleted contribs ·
page moves ·
block user ·
block log)
Norquist9 (
talk ·
contribs ·
deleted contribs ·
page moves ·
block user ·
block log)
Brazensunseeker (
talk ·
contribs ·
deleted contribs ·
page moves ·
block user ·
block log)
Kombatstilettos (
talk ·
contribs ·
deleted contribs ·
page moves ·
block user ·
block log)
Wikiwikimoore ( talk) 21:13, 6 July 2008 (UTC) reply
There is evidence of ongoing sock puppetry starting in August of 07 through present. The editing is with respect to the Violet Blue (author) page. All of the edits are POV pushing on one of three issues. One: attempts to remove as much information about Violet's tenure at SRL. Two: attacks against editors who disagree with Ninavizz, or her sock puppets. Three: attacks and edits around the BoingBoing-Violet issue.
Ninavizz's POV on the SRL issue is made clear in this talk page edit (which strangely was made while not logged in and was manually signed ):
In this edit she tells us, "my edits were not POV pushing about SRL: they were and continue to be, fact, and a fact that I could at the time (and can still) personally substantiate through my direct involvement with SRL". Conveniently we don't need to argue that Ninavizz has been involved in sock puppetry as she admits to it twice. Once in a comment on boingboing.net where Ninavizz states "Wikipedia, that displays a coffeehouse WiFi's IP address that I'd made the 3 Wikipedia edits from (as well as I suppose, sending emails to his account on, months prior- good catch)". (Edits from referenced IP here Special:Contributions/67.188.110.143, SRL POV pushing.) Then again when, as Ninavizz, she edits one of her puppets talk pages to disclose that it was a puppet [ [1]] which she later thinks better of and deletes [ [2]].
Below I list exemplary edits from each puppet:
I clearly have a COI with respect to the violet blue page, which I disclosed, on Feb 8 2007, before making any edits to the page [ [3]]. Regardless of my COI, I feel that, where I may have made some mistakes during my process of learning the culture and practices of Wikipedia, I have been a positive element who tries to come to consensus about changes before making them. It is also clear that Ninavizz has a personal issue with Violet. There are current and ongoing disputes on the page, that clearly include other parties as well, which may or may not include other sock puppets.
I have shown unarguably that Ninavizz has been involved in at least some level of sock puppetry and provided strong evidence of an extensive and long running POV campaign using puppets.
The person placing this report was involved in an action with the subject of the article in which they, at a microphone in a public forum, and without any evidence whatsoever, accused Nina of having been "stalking" them on Wikipedia, and then they outed her wikipedia name. I think we all have seen the baleful effects of outing in our recent loss of NewYorkBrad, and I hope that the admins who review this case will proceed accordingly. This person's allegations AFAIK have nothing whatsoever to back them up except POV and mean-spiritedness. -- BenBurch ( talk) 21:28, 6 July 2008 (UTC) reply