Marlon.sahetapy (
talk ·
contribs ·
deleted contribs ·
page moves ·
block user ·
block log)
Dr.Sauerkraut (
talk ·
contribs ·
deleted contribs ·
page moves ·
block user ·
block log)
Brasileiro1969 (
talk ·
contribs ·
deleted contribs ·
page moves ·
block user ·
block log)
Le Professeur70 (
talk ·
contribs ·
deleted contribs ·
page moves ·
block user ·
block log)
PanteraNegro (
talk ·
contribs ·
deleted contribs ·
page moves ·
block user ·
block log)
Stu ’Bout ye! 11:21, 15 March 2007 (UTC) reply
Identical editing patterns to the same few articles. Using different accounts to evade 3RR and, I presume, to make it appear that there is broader consensus for inserting/removing "greatest" claims into footballer articles. See conversation at WP:AN/I
See:
Stu ’Bout ye! 11:21, 15 March 2007 (UTC) reply
Marlon.sahetapy ( talk · contribs) deleted this SSP entry at 12:56, March 15, 2007 and again at 13:19, March 15, 2007 (UTC). It was reverted and he was warned. Flyguy649 talk contribs 13:55, 15 March 2007 (UTC) reply
Obvious socks per above. I would have already indefblocked all if I weren't marginally involved (Brasileiro1969 reverted one of my edits). —
Quarl (
talk) 2007-03-22 05:57Z
Stubacca, Stubacca.. I am not vandalising your homepage, but am just making my feelings known on your discussion page. Where you have removed comments of both myself and the person you accuse of being my puppetmaster. Now if you were a sport and have nothing to hide, you would leave the comments as they were. Reacted to them; potentially calmed us down (nobody likes being falsely accused, but everyone hates being accused behind their backs - I only found out by looking at your tracks. So why dont you shape up your own behaviour first instead of cloaking your poor editing with policies you half-read and consensus that isnt there. No again, Stubacca -> be a sport and respect my comments on your behaviour. Thank you. I would like to devote one ore two lines to Stubacca. An individual who has an axe to grind because he could not push his comments and views on some Wiki articles. - + - + As a result he now accuses me of being a puppet of someone else. How sad. Rather than starting a proper dialogue supported by facts along proper Wiki etiquette lines, why my views differ from his; he prefers to accuse others of policy violations and ultimately puppeteering - what a frustrated civil servant this guy must be (Pot v. Kettle Policy, I know) - + Please note: that Stubacca already received a warning for his vandalism on the Cruyff page and those of other footballing greats. He justified his actions based on inconclusive evidence. His personal discussion page is littered with 'conflict' with others, although I leave it up to others to decide whether this is a trend in his online behaviour.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Brasileiro1969 ( talk • contribs)
Just want it to be known that I have nothing to with this and that I am highly surprised by all this. But I a bit of surfing uncovered this for me... Have read Stubacca's allegation accusing someone else to be my puppetteer. I also read his threads and reponses on his discussion page (incl. the ones Stubacca's deleted in response to your false allegations, all in an attempt to make your discussion page look clean), football project, and those on the football pages Stubacca has been editing on his little crudade. The one commonality I see is his frustration in losing the consensus on his favorite footballer followed ny his relentless efforts to then trying to get some form of satisfaction. First by vandalizing pages of true football greats, for which Stubacca received an official caution (Johan Cruijff) after a discussion you initiated on football project backfired on you. And secondly by falsely accusing other members who do not share your opinion of puppeteering. Am sure this one will backfire on you as well. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by PanteraNegro ( talk • contribs) 00:44, 18 March 2007 (UTC). Below his caution on Cruyff plus an excerpt of the discussion reply
3 already blocked by Quarl, and his reasoning looks fine to me, so the fourth is now blocked as well, and the puppetmaster for 24 hours. Seraphimblade Talk to me 10:54, 29 March 2007 (UTC) reply
Marlon.sahetapy (
talk ·
contribs ·
deleted contribs ·
page moves ·
block user ·
block log)
Dr.Sauerkraut (
talk ·
contribs ·
deleted contribs ·
page moves ·
block user ·
block log)
Brasileiro1969 (
talk ·
contribs ·
deleted contribs ·
page moves ·
block user ·
block log)
Le Professeur70 (
talk ·
contribs ·
deleted contribs ·
page moves ·
block user ·
block log)
PanteraNegro (
talk ·
contribs ·
deleted contribs ·
page moves ·
block user ·
block log)
Stu ’Bout ye! 11:21, 15 March 2007 (UTC) reply
Identical editing patterns to the same few articles. Using different accounts to evade 3RR and, I presume, to make it appear that there is broader consensus for inserting/removing "greatest" claims into footballer articles. See conversation at WP:AN/I
See:
Stu ’Bout ye! 11:21, 15 March 2007 (UTC) reply
Marlon.sahetapy ( talk · contribs) deleted this SSP entry at 12:56, March 15, 2007 and again at 13:19, March 15, 2007 (UTC). It was reverted and he was warned. Flyguy649 talk contribs 13:55, 15 March 2007 (UTC) reply
Obvious socks per above. I would have already indefblocked all if I weren't marginally involved (Brasileiro1969 reverted one of my edits). —
Quarl (
talk) 2007-03-22 05:57Z
Stubacca, Stubacca.. I am not vandalising your homepage, but am just making my feelings known on your discussion page. Where you have removed comments of both myself and the person you accuse of being my puppetmaster. Now if you were a sport and have nothing to hide, you would leave the comments as they were. Reacted to them; potentially calmed us down (nobody likes being falsely accused, but everyone hates being accused behind their backs - I only found out by looking at your tracks. So why dont you shape up your own behaviour first instead of cloaking your poor editing with policies you half-read and consensus that isnt there. No again, Stubacca -> be a sport and respect my comments on your behaviour. Thank you. I would like to devote one ore two lines to Stubacca. An individual who has an axe to grind because he could not push his comments and views on some Wiki articles. - + - + As a result he now accuses me of being a puppet of someone else. How sad. Rather than starting a proper dialogue supported by facts along proper Wiki etiquette lines, why my views differ from his; he prefers to accuse others of policy violations and ultimately puppeteering - what a frustrated civil servant this guy must be (Pot v. Kettle Policy, I know) - + Please note: that Stubacca already received a warning for his vandalism on the Cruyff page and those of other footballing greats. He justified his actions based on inconclusive evidence. His personal discussion page is littered with 'conflict' with others, although I leave it up to others to decide whether this is a trend in his online behaviour.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Brasileiro1969 ( talk • contribs)
Just want it to be known that I have nothing to with this and that I am highly surprised by all this. But I a bit of surfing uncovered this for me... Have read Stubacca's allegation accusing someone else to be my puppetteer. I also read his threads and reponses on his discussion page (incl. the ones Stubacca's deleted in response to your false allegations, all in an attempt to make your discussion page look clean), football project, and those on the football pages Stubacca has been editing on his little crudade. The one commonality I see is his frustration in losing the consensus on his favorite footballer followed ny his relentless efforts to then trying to get some form of satisfaction. First by vandalizing pages of true football greats, for which Stubacca received an official caution (Johan Cruijff) after a discussion you initiated on football project backfired on you. And secondly by falsely accusing other members who do not share your opinion of puppeteering. Am sure this one will backfire on you as well. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by PanteraNegro ( talk • contribs) 00:44, 18 March 2007 (UTC). Below his caution on Cruyff plus an excerpt of the discussion reply
3 already blocked by Quarl, and his reasoning looks fine to me, so the fourth is now blocked as well, and the puppetmaster for 24 hours. Seraphimblade Talk to me 10:54, 29 March 2007 (UTC) reply