Highfructosecornsyrup (
talk
+ ·
contribs ·
deleted contribs ·
tag ·
block user ·
block log ·
CheckUser)
See also accounts from the checkuser case cited below:
I did edit in Dianetics recently. And got attacked for adding a reliable source by an editor who seems to fulfill the WP:SPA description (99% scientology edits). A little research and I ended up on the Shutterbug/ArbCom page. Cirt's reaction confirms what I said there. Shrampes ( talk) 23:54, 1 December 2008 (UTC) reply
You are overdoing it, but I feel that there is nothing I can do to show you how wrong you are. Did the other editors get notified as well? Shrampes ( talk) 23:37, 2 December 2008 (UTC) reply
I've been looking at it...and I can't find a connection using my usual tactics, except that both Shrampes and HFCS/Wikipediatrix edited the Dianetics article, and that Shrampes started editing at about the same time that Wikipediatrix's editing tapered off. Although Shrampes did edit the HFCS article, s/he also edits a lot of other articles on complex molecules, like polyurethane, tetrachloroethylene, and polyfluorene. Honestly, I can't say that Shrampes is a sock of Wikipediatrix...if s/he is, then she's been incredibly careful about it. For now, I'd say to let Shrampes off the hook and wait until time tells us more. ~ SunDragon34 (talk) 23:14, 5 December 2008 (UTC) reply
Note: There is now an addendum on the Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Highfructosecornsyrup case, so let's wait on further developments here in case there is additional technical information provided. Cirt ( talk) 17:15, 6 December 2008 (UTC) reply
Checkuser came back stale/inconclusive. Given the time passed since many of the accounts edited, I don't believe there is anything to be done here. Closed. Black Kite 09:57, 23 December 2008 (UTC) reply
Highfructosecornsyrup (
talk
+ ·
contribs ·
deleted contribs ·
tag ·
block user ·
block log ·
CheckUser)
See also accounts from the checkuser case cited below:
I did edit in Dianetics recently. And got attacked for adding a reliable source by an editor who seems to fulfill the WP:SPA description (99% scientology edits). A little research and I ended up on the Shutterbug/ArbCom page. Cirt's reaction confirms what I said there. Shrampes ( talk) 23:54, 1 December 2008 (UTC) reply
You are overdoing it, but I feel that there is nothing I can do to show you how wrong you are. Did the other editors get notified as well? Shrampes ( talk) 23:37, 2 December 2008 (UTC) reply
I've been looking at it...and I can't find a connection using my usual tactics, except that both Shrampes and HFCS/Wikipediatrix edited the Dianetics article, and that Shrampes started editing at about the same time that Wikipediatrix's editing tapered off. Although Shrampes did edit the HFCS article, s/he also edits a lot of other articles on complex molecules, like polyurethane, tetrachloroethylene, and polyfluorene. Honestly, I can't say that Shrampes is a sock of Wikipediatrix...if s/he is, then she's been incredibly careful about it. For now, I'd say to let Shrampes off the hook and wait until time tells us more. ~ SunDragon34 (talk) 23:14, 5 December 2008 (UTC) reply
Note: There is now an addendum on the Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Highfructosecornsyrup case, so let's wait on further developments here in case there is additional technical information provided. Cirt ( talk) 17:15, 6 December 2008 (UTC) reply
Checkuser came back stale/inconclusive. Given the time passed since many of the accounts edited, I don't believe there is anything to be done here. Closed. Black Kite 09:57, 23 December 2008 (UTC) reply