Cogswobble (
talk ·
contribs ·
deleted contribs ·
page moves ·
block user ·
block log)
75.21.179.121 (
talk ·
contribs ·
deleted contribs ·
page moves ·
block user ·
block log)
Italiavivi 16:45, 5 May 2007 (UTC) reply
This IP continually shows up to endorse User:Cogswobble's opinions on Fox News Channel and Talk:Fox News Channel. Most recently, when Cogswobble had reached his 3RR limit on changing Fox News Channel's introduction, this IP showed up to make a fourth revert [1].
Check away ;-) This isn't me. Cogswobble talk 16:49, 5 May 2007 (UTC) reply
Lol...incidentally:
That would be a pretty silly use of sockpuppetry. ;-) Cogswobble talk 18:00, 5 May 2007 (UTC) reply
I support Cogswobble - the evidence Italiavivi has presented is, at best, circumstantial. And there's not even a remotely notable volume of it.
The claim that 75 "endorses" Cog's views - and thus is a sockpuppet - is absurd. It amounts to nothing more than "he agrees with him, so it must be the same person". You could apply that to virtually every single editor here.
The only other piece of "evidence" is similarly ridiculous, and could easily be put down to the fact that if several editors agree or disagree with one particular edit there's every chance a number of them will take the same action.
I can't believe this 'sockpuppet' bull has been clogging up the Fox talk page. If there is no other evidence against Cogswobble then it reflects very badly on the editors making such a claim. Edders 17:59, 7 May 2007 (UTC) reply
Cogswobble (
talk ·
contribs ·
deleted contribs ·
page moves ·
block user ·
block log)
75.21.179.121 (
talk ·
contribs ·
deleted contribs ·
page moves ·
block user ·
block log)
Italiavivi 16:45, 5 May 2007 (UTC) reply
This IP continually shows up to endorse User:Cogswobble's opinions on Fox News Channel and Talk:Fox News Channel. Most recently, when Cogswobble had reached his 3RR limit on changing Fox News Channel's introduction, this IP showed up to make a fourth revert [1].
Check away ;-) This isn't me. Cogswobble talk 16:49, 5 May 2007 (UTC) reply
Lol...incidentally:
That would be a pretty silly use of sockpuppetry. ;-) Cogswobble talk 18:00, 5 May 2007 (UTC) reply
I support Cogswobble - the evidence Italiavivi has presented is, at best, circumstantial. And there's not even a remotely notable volume of it.
The claim that 75 "endorses" Cog's views - and thus is a sockpuppet - is absurd. It amounts to nothing more than "he agrees with him, so it must be the same person". You could apply that to virtually every single editor here.
The only other piece of "evidence" is similarly ridiculous, and could easily be put down to the fact that if several editors agree or disagree with one particular edit there's every chance a number of them will take the same action.
I can't believe this 'sockpuppet' bull has been clogging up the Fox talk page. If there is no other evidence against Cogswobble then it reflects very badly on the editors making such a claim. Edders 17:59, 7 May 2007 (UTC) reply