Achidiac (
talk ·
contribs ·
deleted contribs ·
page moves ·
block user ·
block log)
Rdpaperclip (
talk ·
contribs ·
deleted contribs ·
page moves ·
block user ·
block log)
T3Smile (
talk ·
contribs ·
deleted contribs ·
page moves ·
block user ·
block log)
60.241.91.14 (
talk ·
contribs ·
deleted contribs ·
page moves ·
block user ·
block log)
203.171.197.129 (
talk ·
contribs ·
deleted contribs ·
page moves ·
block user ·
block log) See
AfD#2
Eggplantpasta (
talk ·
contribs ·
deleted contribs ·
page moves ·
block user ·
block log) Potential meatpuppet. See
AfD#2
150.101.154.245 (
talk ·
contribs ·
deleted contribs ·
page moves ·
block user ·
block log) See
AfD#2
Gnan garra 15:30, 4 November 2007 (UTC) reply
All three (Achidiac, Rdpaperclip, T3Smile) are primarily SPA editors who edit articles in relation to Anthony Chidiac, each have participated at the AfD's #1 [1] [2] [3] #2 [4] [5] [6], and at the current DrV [7] [8] [9] in relation to the subject an all give extensive commentary when discussing matters. After visual checking and comparison of edit histories for each editor I find no time overlaps where editing occured inconjunction with each other, there are occassions where one stops editing and another starts
example of most recent occurance copy of T3smile contribs
Between these edits from Achidiac contribs
Additionally Image:O3 ph2.jpg to my eye I'd say that these people are the parents of Anthony Chidiac( User:Achidiac) as seen in this Image:Mega2.png which is an apparent copyright violation from Network Ten notice the watermark on at the bottom left. Both images were uploaded by User:Rdpaperclip. Who indentifies the people in Image:O3 ph2.jpg as mum and dad in upload. Then on the 31st July 2007 diff User:T3Smile removes the copyright and fair use disputed tags changing them to {{ self}} with GFDL-no-disclaimers and cc-by-sa-2.5,2.0,1.0 without any contact or discussion with User:Rdpaperclip about the licensing on any page I also checked if is there was any discussion within deleted edits to Anthony Chidiac and its talk page, Rdpaperclip also made no edits in response to the changes. There was also no bot edits to the article history where the image was used that would have notifed other editors that a problem existed. Image:O3 ph2.jpg was uploaded on the 18th July without any category listing nor did Rdpaperclip notify anyone of there existance, looking at Rdpaperclips edit history no edits where made by this account for almost 2 days immediately after uploading ph3. Yet on the 19th July T3smile added the images ph1,ph2 and ph3 to Internet Cafe [10]
Complimentary and sequential image naming
meta data on ph1,ph4,ph5 indicate the same type of camera was used an Olympus C-3000 Zoom with the same software v574p-74.
The first date of editing by each account:
Except for a few wikignome-type edits, all the editing has focused on promoting A. Chidiac connected entities.
Re: Pics - I see no issue with using an image with watermark as chidiac has the letter of permission by the network to use it. Its in the press kit both RD and I have. But, I am unaware as to how to put it here as I didn't put them up in the first place. Seems to me that RD and I tried to put the same pics up maybe at or around the same time? I remember seeing a notice from an admin saying that duplicate pics exist, so I recall going over to RD's version uploaded and helping him out as he was away on holidays and they were to be deleted. These things happen when two people get the same material from the subject of article - its called a double up! (we should have talked about it beforehand to avoid duplicate uploads, but we hardly see each other off wikipedia and usually at a lecture!) I manually cleanup my user discussion page when I have completed issues, to avoid clutter. As mentioned in discussion, Chidiac's dad is deceased, so I cant tell you whether the pic is of his mum or dad, RD's mum and dad, or someones mum and dad! They look like a mum and dad but they could be my gran and pa! - (My mum married my dad who is of Italian origin). Either way, the pics are owned by chidiac and chidiac has given the OK to use them. They were pics used in advertising both at the venue and in the press (in particular, the ad with the mum and dad came with a slogan - "even mum and dad can come!" - so thats where the mum and dad came from I'm guessing!!!). I am unsure as to how to put "public" pics here, so I'm sorry if I did something wrong there by getting RD and chidiac to do it, but assure you the pics are cleared by subject of article. I've only been hooked on wikipedia for four months, so would appreciate the help not the hinderance. Ta T-- T3Smile 06:21, 5 November 2007 (UTC) reply
These accounts are the same person, or several people in collusion. I recommend indef blocking all of them for abusive sockpuppetry. - Jehochman Talk 15:23, 5 November 2007 (UTC) reply
Achidiac (
talk ·
contribs ·
deleted contribs ·
page moves ·
block user ·
block log)
Rdpaperclip (
talk ·
contribs ·
deleted contribs ·
page moves ·
block user ·
block log)
T3Smile (
talk ·
contribs ·
deleted contribs ·
page moves ·
block user ·
block log)
60.241.91.14 (
talk ·
contribs ·
deleted contribs ·
page moves ·
block user ·
block log)
203.171.197.129 (
talk ·
contribs ·
deleted contribs ·
page moves ·
block user ·
block log) See
AfD#2
Eggplantpasta (
talk ·
contribs ·
deleted contribs ·
page moves ·
block user ·
block log) Potential meatpuppet. See
AfD#2
150.101.154.245 (
talk ·
contribs ·
deleted contribs ·
page moves ·
block user ·
block log) See
AfD#2
Gnan garra 15:30, 4 November 2007 (UTC) reply
All three (Achidiac, Rdpaperclip, T3Smile) are primarily SPA editors who edit articles in relation to Anthony Chidiac, each have participated at the AfD's #1 [1] [2] [3] #2 [4] [5] [6], and at the current DrV [7] [8] [9] in relation to the subject an all give extensive commentary when discussing matters. After visual checking and comparison of edit histories for each editor I find no time overlaps where editing occured inconjunction with each other, there are occassions where one stops editing and another starts
example of most recent occurance copy of T3smile contribs
Between these edits from Achidiac contribs
Additionally Image:O3 ph2.jpg to my eye I'd say that these people are the parents of Anthony Chidiac( User:Achidiac) as seen in this Image:Mega2.png which is an apparent copyright violation from Network Ten notice the watermark on at the bottom left. Both images were uploaded by User:Rdpaperclip. Who indentifies the people in Image:O3 ph2.jpg as mum and dad in upload. Then on the 31st July 2007 diff User:T3Smile removes the copyright and fair use disputed tags changing them to {{ self}} with GFDL-no-disclaimers and cc-by-sa-2.5,2.0,1.0 without any contact or discussion with User:Rdpaperclip about the licensing on any page I also checked if is there was any discussion within deleted edits to Anthony Chidiac and its talk page, Rdpaperclip also made no edits in response to the changes. There was also no bot edits to the article history where the image was used that would have notifed other editors that a problem existed. Image:O3 ph2.jpg was uploaded on the 18th July without any category listing nor did Rdpaperclip notify anyone of there existance, looking at Rdpaperclips edit history no edits where made by this account for almost 2 days immediately after uploading ph3. Yet on the 19th July T3smile added the images ph1,ph2 and ph3 to Internet Cafe [10]
Complimentary and sequential image naming
meta data on ph1,ph4,ph5 indicate the same type of camera was used an Olympus C-3000 Zoom with the same software v574p-74.
The first date of editing by each account:
Except for a few wikignome-type edits, all the editing has focused on promoting A. Chidiac connected entities.
Re: Pics - I see no issue with using an image with watermark as chidiac has the letter of permission by the network to use it. Its in the press kit both RD and I have. But, I am unaware as to how to put it here as I didn't put them up in the first place. Seems to me that RD and I tried to put the same pics up maybe at or around the same time? I remember seeing a notice from an admin saying that duplicate pics exist, so I recall going over to RD's version uploaded and helping him out as he was away on holidays and they were to be deleted. These things happen when two people get the same material from the subject of article - its called a double up! (we should have talked about it beforehand to avoid duplicate uploads, but we hardly see each other off wikipedia and usually at a lecture!) I manually cleanup my user discussion page when I have completed issues, to avoid clutter. As mentioned in discussion, Chidiac's dad is deceased, so I cant tell you whether the pic is of his mum or dad, RD's mum and dad, or someones mum and dad! They look like a mum and dad but they could be my gran and pa! - (My mum married my dad who is of Italian origin). Either way, the pics are owned by chidiac and chidiac has given the OK to use them. They were pics used in advertising both at the venue and in the press (in particular, the ad with the mum and dad came with a slogan - "even mum and dad can come!" - so thats where the mum and dad came from I'm guessing!!!). I am unsure as to how to put "public" pics here, so I'm sorry if I did something wrong there by getting RD and chidiac to do it, but assure you the pics are cleared by subject of article. I've only been hooked on wikipedia for four months, so would appreciate the help not the hinderance. Ta T-- T3Smile 06:21, 5 November 2007 (UTC) reply
These accounts are the same person, or several people in collusion. I recommend indef blocking all of them for abusive sockpuppetry. - Jehochman Talk 15:23, 5 November 2007 (UTC) reply