Traditional unionist ( talk) 12:33, 21 May 2008 (UTC) reply
First edit under this dynamic IP was to revert my removal of weaslry, which this user had added. Revert two more times. Next edit is reportme for 3RR. Edit showing knowledge of WP:NPA and harrasment. I strongly suspect this is a SPA sock account designed to push me over the 3RR limit to obtain a block. Very little evidence to demonstrate who the sockpuppeteer is, save for this personal attack regarding my username would be similar to the edit summary here.
I don't feel sorry for you, Traditional unionist. You were blocked for violating 3RR. [1] The opposing anonymous editor got off on a technicality, viz. he happened to use two different IP addresses during the revert war, so it may have appeared like two different users. That doesn't excuse what you did, and at this point, there's nothing to gain by blocking the IP because blocks are meant to be preventative, not solely punitive. Shalom ( Hello • Peace) 02:06, 28 May 2008 (UTC) reply
Traditional unionist ( talk) 12:33, 21 May 2008 (UTC) reply
First edit under this dynamic IP was to revert my removal of weaslry, which this user had added. Revert two more times. Next edit is reportme for 3RR. Edit showing knowledge of WP:NPA and harrasment. I strongly suspect this is a SPA sock account designed to push me over the 3RR limit to obtain a block. Very little evidence to demonstrate who the sockpuppeteer is, save for this personal attack regarding my username would be similar to the edit summary here.
I don't feel sorry for you, Traditional unionist. You were blocked for violating 3RR. [1] The opposing anonymous editor got off on a technicality, viz. he happened to use two different IP addresses during the revert war, so it may have appeared like two different users. That doesn't excuse what you did, and at this point, there's nothing to gain by blocking the IP because blocks are meant to be preventative, not solely punitive. Shalom ( Hello • Peace) 02:06, 28 May 2008 (UTC) reply